scholarly journals Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry-climate models weighted by model performance and independence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Amos ◽  
Paul J. Young ◽  
J. Scott Hosking ◽  
Jean-François Lamarque ◽  
N. Luke Abraham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Current Method ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Model Independence ◽  
Model Ensembles

Abstract. The current method for averaging model ensembles, which is to calculate a multi model mean, assumes model independence and equal model skill. Sharing of model components amongst families of models and research centres, conflated by growing ensemble size, means model independence cannot be assumed and is hard to quantify. We present a methodology to produce a weighted model ensemble projection, accounting for model performance and model independence. Model weights are calculated by comparing model hindcasts to a selection of metrics chosen for their physical relevance to the process or phenomena of interest. This weighting methodology is applied to the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) ensemble, to investigate Antarctic ozone depletion and subsequent recovery. The weighted mean projects an ozone recovery to 1980 levels, by 2056 with a 95 % confidence interval (2052–2060), 4 years earlier than the most recent study. Perfect model testing and out-of-sample testing validate the results and show a greater projective skill than a standard multi model mean. Interestingly, the construction of a weighted mean also provides insight into model performance and dependence between the models. This weighting methodology is robust to both model and metric choices and therefore has potential applications throughout the climate and chemistry-climate modelling communities.

scholarly journals Projecting ozone hole recovery using an ensemble of chemistry–climate models weighted by model performance and independence

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 9961-9977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Amos ◽  
Paul J. Young ◽  
J. Scott Hosking ◽  
Jean-François Lamarque ◽  
N. Luke Abraham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Ensemble Averaging ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Model Independence ◽  
Model Components

Abstract. Calculating a multi-model mean, a commonly used method for ensemble averaging, assumes model independence and equal model skill. Sharing of model components amongst families of models and research centres, conflated by growing ensemble size, means model independence cannot be assumed and is hard to quantify. We present a methodology to produce a weighted-model ensemble projection, accounting for model performance and model independence. Model weights are calculated by comparing model hindcasts to a selection of metrics chosen for their physical relevance to the process or phenomena of interest. This weighting methodology is applied to the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) ensemble to investigate Antarctic ozone depletion and subsequent recovery. The weighted mean projects an ozone recovery to 1980 levels, by 2056 with a 95 % confidence interval (2052–2060), 4 years earlier than the most recent study. Perfect-model testing and out-of-sample testing validate the results and show a greater projective skill than a standard multi-model mean. Interestingly, the construction of a weighted mean also provides insight into model performance and dependence between the models. This weighting methodology is robust to both model and metric choices and therefore has potential applications throughout the climate and chemistry–climate modelling communities.

Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions

2007 ◽  
Vol 365 (1857) ◽  
pp. 2163-2177 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Stainforth ◽  
Thomas E Downing ◽  
Richard Washington ◽  
Ana Lopez ◽  
Mark New
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Large Ensembles ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Climate Model Simulations ◽  
Model Ensembles ◽  
A Minor

There is a scientific consensus regarding the reality of anthropogenic climate change. This has led to substantial efforts to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions and thereby mitigate the impacts of climate change on a global scale. Despite these efforts, we are committed to substantial further changes over at least the next few decades. Societies will therefore have to adapt to changes in climate. Both adaptation and mitigation require action on scales ranging from local to global, but adaptation could directly benefit from climate predictions on regional scales while mitigation could be driven solely by awareness of the global problem; regional projections being principally of motivational value. We discuss how recent developments of large ensembles of climate model simulations can be interpreted to provide information on these scales and to inform societal decisions. Adaptation is most relevant as an influence on decisions which exist irrespective of climate change, but which have consequences on decadal time-scales. Even in such situations, climate change is often only a minor influence; perhaps helping to restrict the choice of ‘no regrets’ strategies. Nevertheless, if climate models are to provide inputs to societal decisions, it is important to interpret them appropriately. We take climate ensembles exploring model uncertainty as potentially providing a lower bound on the maximum range of uncertainty and thus a non-discountable climate change envelope. An analysis pathway is presented, describing how this information may provide an input to decisions, sometimes via a number of other analysis procedures and thus a cascade of uncertainty. An initial screening is seen as a valuable component of this process, potentially avoiding unnecessary effort while guiding decision makers through issues of confidence and robustness in climate modelling information. Our focus is the usage of decadal to centennial time-scale climate change simulations as inputs to decision making, but we acknowledge that robust adaptation to the variability of present day climate encourages the development of less vulnerable systems as well as building critical experience in how to respond to climatic uncertainty.

scholarly journals Hydroclimate variability in Scandinavia over the last millennium – insights from a climate model–proxy data comparison

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1831-1850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Seftigen ◽  
Hugues Goosse ◽  
Francois Klein ◽  
Deliang Chen
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Last Millennium ◽  
Atmospheric Variability ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
Hydroclimate Variability ◽  
Transient Simulations

Abstract. The integration of climate proxy information with general circulation model (GCM) results offers considerable potential for deriving greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying climate variability, as well as unique opportunities for out-of-sample evaluations of model performance. In this study, we combine insights from a new tree-ring hydroclimate reconstruction from Scandinavia with projections from a suite of forced transient simulations of the last millennium and historical intervals from the CMIP5 and PMIP3 archives. Model simulations and proxy reconstruction data are found to broadly agree on the modes of atmospheric variability that produce droughts–pluvials in the region. Despite these dynamical similarities, large differences between simulated and reconstructed hydroclimate time series remain. We find that the GCM-simulated multi-decadal and/or longer hydroclimate variability is systematically smaller than the proxy-based estimates, whereas the dominance of GCM-simulated high-frequency components of variability is not reflected in the proxy record. Furthermore, the paleoclimate evidence indicates in-phase coherencies between regional hydroclimate and temperature on decadal timescales, i.e., sustained wet periods have often been concurrent with warm periods and vice versa. The CMIP5–PMIP3 archive suggests, however, out-of-phase coherencies between the two variables in the last millennium. The lack of adequate understanding of mechanisms linking temperature and moisture supply on longer timescales has serious implications for attribution and prediction of regional hydroclimate changes. Our findings stress the need for further paleoclimate data–model intercomparison efforts to expand our understanding of the dynamics of hydroclimate variability and change, to enhance our ability to evaluate climate models, and to provide a more comprehensive view of future drought and pluvial risks.

scholarly journals Hydroclimate variability in Scandinavia over the last millennium – insights from a climate model-proxy data comparison

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Seftigen ◽  
Hugues Goosse ◽  
Francois Klein ◽  
Deliang Chen
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Last Millennium ◽  
Atmospheric Variability ◽  
Out Of Sample

Abstract. The integration of climate proxy information with General Circulation Model (GCM) results offers considerable potential for deriving greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying climate variability, as well as unique opportunities for out-of-sample evaluations of model performance. In this study, we combine insights from a new tree-ring hydroclimate reconstruction from Scandinavian with projections from a suite of forced transient simulations of the last millennium and historical intervals from the CMIP5 and PMIP3 archives. Model simulations and proxy reconstruction data are found to broadly agree on the modes of atmospheric variability that produces droughts/pluvials in the region. But despite these dynamical similarities, large differences between simulated and reconstructed hydroclimate time series remain. We find simulated interannual components of variability to be overestimated, while the multidecadal/longer timescale components generally are too weak. Specifically, summertime moisture variability and temperature are weakly negatively associated at inter-annual timescales but positively correlated at decadal timescales, revealed from observational and proxy evidences. On this background, the CMIP5/PMIP3 simulated timescale dependent relationship between regional precipitation and temperature is considerably biased, because the short-term negative association is overestimated, and the long-term relationship is significantly underestimated. The lack of adequate understanding for mechanisms linking temperature and moisture supply on longer timescales has important implication for future projections. Weak multidecadal variability in models also implies that inference about future persistent droughts and pluvials based on the latest generation global climate models will likely underestimate the true risk of these events.

scholarly journals Are we using the right fuel to drive hydrological models? A climate impact study in the Upper Blue Nile

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 2163-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Liersch ◽  
Julia Tecklenburg ◽  
Henning Rust ◽  
Andreas Dobler ◽  
Madlen Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Climate Impact ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Blue Nile ◽  
Projected Change ◽  
Model Ensembles

Abstract. Climate simulations are the fuel to drive hydrological models that are used to assess the impacts of climate change and variability on hydrological parameters, such as river discharges, soil moisture, and evapotranspiration. Unlike with cars, where we know which fuel the engine requires, we never know in advance what unexpected side effects might be caused by the fuel we feed our models with. Sometimes we increase the fuel's octane number (bias correction) to achieve better performance and find out that the model behaves differently but not always as was expected or desired. This study investigates the impacts of projected climate change on the hydrology of the Upper Blue Nile catchment using two model ensembles consisting of five global CMIP5 Earth system models and 10 regional climate models (CORDEX Africa). WATCH forcing data were used to calibrate an eco-hydrological model and to bias-correct both model ensembles using slightly differing approaches. On the one hand it was found that the bias correction methods considerably improved the performance of average rainfall characteristics in the reference period (1970–1999) in most of the cases. This also holds true for non-extreme discharge conditions between Q20 and Q80. On the other hand, bias-corrected simulations tend to overemphasize magnitudes of projected change signals and extremes. A general weakness of both uncorrected and bias-corrected simulations is the rather poor representation of high and low flows and their extremes, which were often deteriorated by bias correction. This inaccuracy is a crucial deficiency for regional impact studies dealing with water management issues and it is therefore important to analyse model performance and characteristics and the effect of bias correction, and eventually to exclude some climate models from the ensemble. However, the multi-model means of all ensembles project increasing average annual discharges in the Upper Blue Nile catchment and a shift in seasonal patterns, with decreasing discharges in June and July and increasing discharges from August to November.

Uncertainty Quantification in Multi-Model Ensembles

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Mark Sanderson
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Uncertainty Quantification ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Initial Condition ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Model Framework ◽  
Validation Data ◽  
Model Ensembles

Long-term planning for many sectors of society—including infrastructure, human health, agriculture, food security, water supply, insurance, conflict, and migration—requires an assessment of the range of possible futures which the planet might experience. Unlike short-term forecasts for which validation data exists for comparing forecast to observation, long-term forecasts have almost no validation data. As a result, researchers must rely on supporting evidence to make their projections. A review of methods for quantifying the uncertainty of climate predictions is given. The primary tool for quantifying these uncertainties are climate models, which attempt to model all the relevant processes that are important in climate change. However, neither the construction nor calibration of climate models is perfect, and therefore the uncertainties due to model errors must also be taken into account in the uncertainty quantification.Typically, prediction uncertainty is quantified by generating ensembles of solutions from climate models to span possible futures. For instance, initial condition uncertainty is quantified by generating an ensemble of initial states that are consistent with available observations and then integrating the climate model starting from each initial condition. A climate model is itself subject to uncertain choices in modeling certain physical processes. Some of these choices can be sampled using so-called perturbed physics ensembles, whereby uncertain parameters or structural switches are perturbed within a single climate model framework. For a variety of reasons, there is a strong reliance on so-called ensembles of opportunity, which are multi-model ensembles (MMEs) formed by collecting predictions from different climate modeling centers, each using a potentially different framework to represent relevant processes for climate change. The most extensive collection of these MMEs is associated with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). However, the component models have biases, simplifications, and interdependencies that must be taken into account when making formal risk assessments. Techniques and concepts for integrating model projections in MMEs are reviewed, including differing paradigms of ensembles and how they relate to observations and reality. Aspects of these conceptual issues then inform the more practical matters of how to combine and weight model projections to best represent the uncertainties associated with projected climate change.

scholarly journals The Impact of Climate Change on Material Degradation Criteria in Heritage over Iran: Regional Climate Model Evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 02006
Author(s):  
Hamed Hedayatnia ◽  
Marijke Steeman ◽  
Nathan Van Den Bossche
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Salt Crystallization ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Impact Of Climate Change ◽  
Climate Change Effects ◽  
The Impact

Understanding how climate change accelerates or slows down the process of material deterioration is the first step towards assessing adaptive approaches for the preservation of historical heritage. Analysis of the climate change effects on the degradation risk assessment parameters like salt crystallization cycles is of crucial importance when considering mitigating actions. Due to the vulnerability of cultural heritage in Iran to climate change, the impact of this phenomenon on basic parameters plus variables more critical to building damage like salt crystallization index needs to be analyzed. Regional climate modelling projections can be used to asses the impact of climate change effects on heritage. The output of two different regional climate models, the ALARO-0 model (Ghent University-RMI, Belgium) and the REMO model (HZG-GERICS, Germany), is analyzed to find out which model is more adapted to the region. So the focus of this research is mainly on the evaluation to determine the reliability of both models over the region. For model validation, a comparison between model data and observations was performed in 4 different climate zones for 30 years to find out how reliable these models are in the field of building pathology.

scholarly journals Design and implementation of the infrastructure of HadGEM3: the next-generation Met Office climate modelling system

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. T. Hewitt ◽  
D. Copsey ◽  
I. D. Culverwell ◽  
C. M. Harris ◽  
R. S. R. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Model Atmosphere ◽  
Ocean Model ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Model Components ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Technical Solutions ◽  
Modelling System

Abstract. This paper describes the development of a technically robust climate modelling system, HadGEM3, which couples the Met Office Unified Model atmosphere component, the NEMO ocean model and the Los Alamos sea ice model (CICE) using the OASIS coupler. Details of the coupling and technical solutions of the physical model (HadGEM3-AO) are documented, in addition to a description of the configurations of the individual submodels. The paper demonstrates that the implementation of the model has resulted in accurate conservation of heat and freshwater across the model components. The model performance in early versions of this climate model is briefly described to demonstrate that the results are scientifically credible. HadGEM3-AO is the basis for a number of modelling efforts outside of the Met Office, both within the UK and internationally. This documentation of the HadGEM3-AO system provides a detailed reference for developers of HadGEM3-based climate configurations.

Using PRIMAVERA high-resolution global climate models for European windstorm risk assessment in present and future climates for the (re)insurance industry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Lockwood ◽  
Erika Palin ◽  
Galina Guentchev ◽  
Malcolm Roberts
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Insurance Industry ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Storm Track ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Business And Society ◽  
High Resolution Models

<p>PRIMAVERA is a European Union Horizon2020 project about creating a new generation of advanced and well-evaluated high-resolution global climate models, for the benefit of governments, business and society in general. The project has been engaging with several sectors, including finance, transport, and energy, to understand the extent to which any improved process understanding arising from high-resolution global climate modelling can – in turn – help with using climate model output to address user needs.</p><p>In this talk we will outline our work for the finance and (re)insurance industries.  Following consultation with members of the industry, we are using PRIMAVERA climate models to generate a European windstorm event set for use in catastrophe modelling and risk analysis.  The event set is generated from five different climate models, each run at a selection of resolutions ranging from 18-140km, covering the period 1950-2050, giving approximately 1700 years of climate model data in total.  High-resolution climate models tend to have reduced biases in storm track position (which is too zonal in low-resolution climate models) and windstorm intensity.  We will compare the properties of the windstorm footprints and associated risk across the different models and resolutions, to assess whether the high-resolution models lead to improved estimation of European windstorm risk.  We will also compare windstorm risk in present and future climates, to see if a consistent picture emerges between models.  Finally we will address the question of whether the event sets from each PRIMAVERA model can be combined to form a multi-model event set ensemble covering thousands of years of windstorm data.</p>

scholarly journals A suite of Early Eocene (~55 Ma) climate model boundary conditions

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 529-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Herold ◽  
J. Buzan ◽  
M. Seton ◽  
A. Goldner ◽  
J. A. M. Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Drake Passage ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Early Eocene ◽  
Tidal Dissipation ◽  
Isthmus Of Panama ◽  
Climate Simulations ◽  
First Time

Abstract. We describe a set of Early Eocene (~55 Ma) climate model boundary conditions constructed in a self-consistent reference frame and incorporating recent data and methodologies. Given the growing need for uniform experimental design within the Eocene climate modelling community, we make publically available our datasets of Eocene topography, bathymetry, tidal dissipation, vegetation, aerosol distributions and river runoff. Particularly our Eocene topography and bathymetry has been significantly improved compared to previously utilized boundary conditions. Major improvements include the paleogeography of Antarctica, Australia, Europe, the Drake Passage and the Isthmus of Panama, and our boundary conditions include modelled estimates of Eocene aerosol distributions and tidal dissipation for the first time, both consistent with our paleotopography and paleobathymetry. The resolution of our datasets (1° × 1°) is also unprecedented and will facilitate high resolution climate simulations. In light of the inherent uncertainties involved in reconstructing global boundary conditions for past time periods these datasets should be considered as one interpretation of the available data. This paper marks the beginning of a process for reconstructing a set of accurate, open-access Eocene boundary conditions for use in climate models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document