scholarly journals One year of CNR-IMAA multi-wavelength Raman lidar measurements in correspondence of CALIPSO overpass: Level 1 products comparison

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 8429-8468 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Mona ◽  
G. Pappalardo ◽  
A. Amodeo ◽  
G. D'Amico ◽  
F. Madonna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Difference ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Continental Scale ◽  
Tropospheric Aerosol ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Multi Wavelength ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mean Differences

Abstract. At CNR-IMAA, an aerosol lidar system is operative since May 2000 in the framework of EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar Network), the first lidar network for tropospheric aerosol study on continental scale. High quality multi-wavelength measurements make this system a reference point for the validation of data products provided by CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations), the first satellite-borne lidar specifically designed for aerosol and cloud study. Since 14 June 2006, devoted measurements are performed at CNR-IMAA in coincidence of CALIPSO overpasses. For the first time, results on 1-year comparisons between ground-based multi-wavelength Raman lidar measurements and corresponding CALIPSO lidar Level 1 profiles are presented. A methodology for the comparison is presented and discussed into details. Cases with the detection of cirrus clouds in CALIPSO data are separately analysed for taking into account eventual multiple scattering effects. For cirrus cloud cases, few cases are available to draw any conclusions. For clear sky conditions, the comparison shows good performances of the CALIPSO on-board lidar: the mean relative difference between the ground-based and CALIPSO Level 1 measurements is always within its standard deviation at all altitudes, with a mean difference in the 3–8 km altitude range of (−2±12)%. At altitude ranges corresponding to the typical PBL height observed at CNR-IMAA, a mean underestimation of (−24±20)% is observed in CALIPSO data, probably due to the difference in the aerosol content at the location of PEARL and CALIPSO ground-track location. Finally, the mean differences are on average lower for the closest overpasses (at about 40 km), with an increment of the differences at all altitude ranges when the 80 km overpasses are considered.

scholarly journals One year of CNR-IMAA multi-wavelength Raman lidar measurements in coincidence with CALIPSO overpasses: Level 1 products comparison

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (18) ◽  
pp. 7213-7228 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Mona ◽  
G. Pappalardo ◽  
A. Amodeo ◽  
G. D'Amico ◽  
F. Madonna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mean Difference ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Continental Scale ◽  
Tropospheric Aerosol ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Multi Wavelength ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Ground Based Lidar

Abstract. At CNR-IMAA, an aerosol lidar system has operated since May 2000 in the framework of EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar Network), the first lidar network for tropospheric aerosol study on a continental scale. High quality multi-wavelength measurements make this system a reference point for the validation of data products provided by CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations), the first satellite-borne lidar specifically designed for aerosol and cloud study. Since 14 June 2006, dedicated measurements have been performed at CNR-IMAA in coincidence with CALIPSO overpasses. For the first time, results on 1-year comparisons between ground-based multi-wavelength Raman lidar measurements and corresponding CALIPSO lidar Level 1 profiles are presented. A methodology for the comparison is presented and discussed in detail. Night-time cases are considered to take advantage from Raman capability of the ground based lidar. Cases with the detection of cirrus clouds in CALIPSO data are separately analysed for taking into account multiple scattering effects. For cirrus cloud cases, few cases are available to draw any conclusions. For clear sky conditions, the comparison shows good performances of the CALIPSO on-board lidar: the mean relative difference between the ground-based and CALIPSO Level 1 measurements is always within its standard deviation at all altitudes, with a mean difference in the 3–8 km altitude range of (−2±12)%. At altitude ranges corresponding to the typical PBL height observed at CNR-IMAA, a mean difference of (−24±20)% is observed in CALIPSO data, probably due to the difference in the aerosol content at the location of PEARL and CALIPSO ground-track location. Finally, the mean differences are on average lower at all altitude ranges for the closest overpasses (at about 40 km) respect to the 80-km overpasses.

scholarly journals Validation of CALIPSO space-borne-derived aerosol vertical structures using a ground-based lidar in Athens, Greece

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 561-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Mamouri ◽  
V. Amiridis ◽  
A. Papayannis ◽  
E. Giannakaki ◽  
G. Tsaknakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Air Masses ◽  
Continental Scale ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Tropospheric Aerosol ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Multi Wavelength ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Signal Attenuations

Abstract. We present initial aerosol validation results of the space-borne lidar CALIOP retrievals -onboard the CALIPSO satellite-, using coincident observations performed with a ground-based lidar in Athens, Greece (37.9° N, 23.6° E). A multi-wavelength ground-based backscatter/Raman lidar system is operating since 2000 at the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) in the framework of the European Aerosol Research LIdar NETwork (EARLINET), the first lidar network for tropospheric aerosol studies on a continental scale. Since July 2006, a total of 40 coincidental aerosol ground-based lidar measurements were performed over Athens during CALIPSO overpasses. The duration of the ground-based lidar measurements was approximately two hours, centred on the satellite overpass time. From the statistical analysis of the ground-based/satellite correlative lidar measurements, a mean bias of the order of 22% for daytime measurements and of 8% for nighttime measurements with respect to the CALIPSO profiles was found for altitudes between 3 and 10 km. The mean bias becomes much larger for altitudes lower that 3 km (of the order of 60%) which is attributed to the decrease of the CALIOP signal-to-noise ratio, as well as to the incomplete overlap height region of the ground based lidar and finally to the distance between the two instruments, resulting to the observation of possibly different air masses. In cases of aerosols layers underlying cirrus clouds, comparison results for aerosol tropospheric profiles become worst, illustrating the limitations of space-borne downward-looking lidar measurements due to strong signal attenuations.

scholarly journals Validation of CALIPSO space-borne-derived attenuated backscatter coefficient profiles using a ground-based lidar in Athens, Greece

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Mamouri ◽  
V. Amiridis ◽  
A. Papayannis ◽  
E. Giannakaki ◽  
G. Tsaknakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cirrus Clouds ◽  
Backscatter Coefficient ◽  
Continental Scale ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Tropospheric Aerosol ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Multi Wavelength ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Horizontal Inhomogeneity ◽  
Station Location

Abstract. We present initial aerosol validation results of the space-borne lidar CALIOP -onboard the CALIPSO satellite- Level 1 attenuated backscatter coefficient profiles, using coincident observations performed with a ground-based lidar in Athens, Greece (37.9° N, 23.6° E). A multi-wavelength ground-based backscatter/Raman lidar system is operating since 2000 at the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) in the framework of the European Aerosol Research LIdar NETwork (EARLINET), the first lidar network for tropospheric aerosol studies on a continental scale. Since July 2006, a total of 40 coincidental aerosol ground-based lidar measurements were performed over Athens during CALIPSO overpasses. The ground-based measurements were performed each time CALIPSO overpasses the station location within a maximum distance of 100 km. The duration of the ground–based lidar measurements was approximately two hours, centred on the satellite overpass time. From the analysis of the ground-based/satellite correlative lidar measurements, a mean bias of the order of 22% for daytime measurements and of 8% for nighttime measurements with respect to the CALIPSO profiles was found for altitudes between 3 and 10 km. The mean bias becomes much larger for altitudes lower that 3 km (of the order of 60%) which is attributed to the increase of aerosol horizontal inhomogeneity within the Planetary Boundary Layer, resulting to the observation of possibly different air masses by the two instruments. In cases of aerosol layers underlying Cirrus clouds, comparison results for aerosol tropospheric profiles become worse. This is attributed to the significant multiple scattering effects in Cirrus clouds experienced by CALIPSO which result in an attenuation which is less than that measured by the ground-based lidar.

scholarly journals The reproducibility of subjective appetite scores

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Raben ◽  
ANNA TAGLIABUE ◽  
Arne Astrup
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Food Consumption ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Prior Experience ◽  
Random Noise ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mean Differences

Although subjective appetite scores are widely used, studies on the reproducibility of this method are scarce. In the present study nine healthy, normal weight, young men recorded their subjective appetite sensations before and during 5 h after two different test meals A and B. The subjects tested each meal twice and in randomized order. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 10 cm in length, were used to assess hunger, satiety, fullness, prospective food consumption and palatability of the meals. Plasma glucose and lactate concentrations were determined concomitantly. The repeatability was investigated for fasting values, Δ-mean 5 h and mean 5 h values, Δ-peak/nadir and peak/nadir values. Although the profiles of the postprandial responses were similar, the coefficients of repeatability (CR = 2SD) on the mean differences were large, ranging from 2·86 to 5.24 cm for fasting scores, 1·36 to 1·88 cm for mean scores, 2·98 to 5·42 cm for Δ-mean scores, and 3·16 to 6·44 cm for peak and Δ-peak scores. For palatability ratings the CK values varied more, ranging from 2·38 (taste) to 8·70 cm (aftertaste). Part of the difference in satiety ratings could be explained by the differences in palatability ratings. However, the low reproducibility may also be caused by a conditioned satiation or hunger due to the subjects' prior experience of the meals and therefore not just be a reflection of random noise. It is likely, however, that the variation in appetite ratings is due both to methodological day-to-day variation and to biological day-to-day variation in subjective appetite sensations.

scholarly journals Retrieval of the tropospheric aerosol microphysical characteristics from the data of multifrequency lidar sensing

2018 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 05055 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Samoilova ◽  
M. Sviridenkov ◽  
I. Penner ◽  
G. Kokhanenko ◽  
Yu. Balin
Keyword(s):  
Refractive Index ◽  
Distribution Function ◽  
Complex Refractive Index ◽  
Size Distribution Function ◽  
Coarse Fraction ◽  
Optical Parameters ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Tropospheric Aerosol ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
The Vertical Distribution

Regular lidar measurements of the vertical distribution of aerosol optical parameters are carried out in Tomsk (56°N, 85°E) since April, 2011. We present the results of retrieval of microphysical characteristics from the data of measurements by means of Raman lidar in 2013. Section 2 is devoted to the theoretical aspects of retrieving the particle size distribution function U(r) (SDF) assuming a known complex refractive index m (CRI). It is shown that the coarse fraction cannot be retrieved unambiguously. When estimating U(r) and m together (section 3), the retrieved refractive index is non-linearly related to the optical coefficients and the distribution function, which leads to appearance of different, including false values of m. The corresponding U(r) differs only slightly, so the inaccuracy in m does not essentially affect the retrieval of the distribution function.

scholarly journals Psychological Stresses and Abuse of Kindergarten Children among Working and Non- Working Mothers

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Aisheh. H. Tawalbeh ◽  
Hasan Al- Zawaydeh
Keyword(s):  
Child Abuse ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Working Mothers ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Kindergarten Children ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mean Differences

The study goal was to investigate the stress among working and non-working mothers and the abuse of their kindergarten age children. Two instruments were developed to measure the stress with two versions for working and non-working mothers, and a child abuse tool. Face validity and retest reliability were conducted. The stress tool contained 25 Items. The tools were administered to a sample of 400, working (200) and nonworking (200) mothers in Amman. A t-test for independent samples was used to test the difference between means of stress and child abuse for working and non-working mothers. Also, two-way analysis of variance was conducted to find the mean differences of the three abuse dimensions: physical, psychological and neglects for working and non-working mothers. Results showed statistical difference (p < 0.05) between means of stress in favor of working mothers, but the difference between means of abuse was in favor of nonworking mothers. The results also showed statistical significant differences (p < 0.05) in the three domains of physical, psychological and neglect abuse, in favor of the non-working mothers. Implications and recommendations for future studies were suggested. 

scholarly journals Estimate of rain evaporation rates from dual-wavelength lidar measurements: comparison against a model analytical solution

2018 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 04002
Author(s):  
Simone Lolli ◽  
Paolo Di Girolamo ◽  
Belay Demoz ◽  
Xiaowen Li ◽  
Ellsworth J. Welton
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Solution ◽  
Evaporation Rate ◽  
Dual Wavelength ◽  
Raman Lidar ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Median Volume ◽  
Multi Wavelength

Rain evaporation significantly contributes to moisture and heat cloud budgets. In this paper, we illustrate an approach to estimate the median volume raindrop diameter and the rain evaporation rate profiles from dual-wavelength lidar measurements. These observational results are compared with those provided by a model analytical solution. We made use of measurements from the multi-wavelength Raman lidar BASIL.

scholarly journals Analysis of hard tissue facial symmetry after unilateral mandibular reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Saleh Khaghaninejad ◽  
Leila Khojastepour ◽  
Hanie Ahmadi ◽  
Saeid Tavanafar ◽  
Alireza Ebrahimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bilateral Symmetry ◽  
Asymmetry Index ◽  
Mandibular Reconstruction ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Bilateral Differences ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background This study aimed to determine how successful reconstruction of the mandible can recover the symmetry. Materials and methods All patients who underwent surgical treatment for unilateral mandibular reconstruction in 4 years were retrospectively examined. Bilateral differences of gonion (GO) positions were measured in 3 dimensions based on immediate postoperative computed tomography. The data collected was analyzed in 3 ways: First, the comparison of bilateral differences of GO in 3 dimensions. Second, the mean Asymmetry Index in control subjects was used to divide all cases into three groups: “Symmetry,” “Asymmetry,” and “Marked asymmetry.” Third, “maximum normal asymmetry” was calculated, and all cases were categorized as below and above maximum normal asymmetry. The difference between two gonial angles was used to determine the amount of asymmetry. Results Forty-seven patients and 47 normal adults were enrolled. The mean bilateral GO difference in the control group was higher than in the study group patients, but it was not statistically significant. The mean Asymmetry Index for the control group was not also significantly higher than the study cases. The study group was “Symmetric” in 78.7% of the cases whereas the control group in 91.4%, 19.1% of the study group and 8.5% of controls were “Asymmetric,” and 2.1% of study cases and 0% of controls were “Markedly Asymmetric.” Maximum normal asymmetry was 82.9% in the study group and 97.8% in the control group. The mean differences between the right and left gonial angles were higher in the study group, but it was not significant (P = 0.1). Conclusions Our study’s results showed that bilateral symmetry in mandibular reconstruction patients was satisfactory and similar to the normal individuals.

scholarly journals Interpolation by means of Given Differences (Central-Difference Notation)

1932 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
W. F. Sheppard
Keyword(s):  
Mean Difference ◽  
Stirling Formula ◽  
Central Difference ◽  
Difference Formula ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Group B

Formulae of interpolation in terms of given central differences might be regarded as falling into two groups, A and B. In group A, the simplest cases are those in which each given difference is one of the two which in the difference table lie nearest to the preceding given difference; the differences are all natural differences (i.e., are not mean differences), and are all expressed in the centraldifference notation. Any such formula can be a central-difference formula for a certain range of the variable: but that is a matter with which we are only incidentally concerned. What I have to do is to examine the formula as determined by the series of differences given. I have then to see how the formula is affected when an ordinary difference is replaced by a mean difference. This brings us to group B, which comprises two formulae only: the Newton-Stirling formula, which expresses the required quantity in terms of a tabulated value and its central differences; and the Newton-Bessel formula, which expresses it in terms of the mean of two tabulated values and the central differences of this mean.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document