scholarly journals A mechanistic model of an upper bound on oceanic carbon export as a function of mixed layer depth and temperature

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 5015-5027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuchuan Li ◽  
Nicolas Cassar

Abstract. Export production reflects the amount of organic matter transferred from the ocean surface to depth through biological processes. This export is in large part controlled by nutrient and light availability, which are conditioned by mixed layer depth (MLD). In this study, building on Sverdrup's critical depth hypothesis, we derive a mechanistic model of an upper bound on carbon export based on the metabolic balance between photosynthesis and respiration as a function of MLD and temperature. We find that the upper bound is a positively skewed bell-shaped function of MLD. Specifically, the upper bound increases with deepening mixed layers down to a critical depth, beyond which a long tail of decreasing carbon export is associated with increasing heterotrophic activity and decreasing light availability. We also show that in cold regions the upper bound on carbon export decreases with increasing temperature when mixed layers are deep, but increases with temperature when mixed layers are shallow. A meta-analysis shows that our model envelopes field estimates of carbon export from the mixed layer. When compared to satellite export production estimates, our model indicates that export production in some regions of the Southern Ocean, particularly the subantarctic zone, is likely limited by light for a significant portion of the growing season.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuchuan Li ◽  
Nicolas Cassar

Abstract. Export production reflects the amount of organic matter transferred from the surface ocean to depth through biological processes. This export is in great part controlled by nutrient and light availability, which are conditioned by mixed layer depth (MLD). In this study, building on Sverdrup’s critical depth hypothesis, we derive a mechanistic model of an upper bound on carbon export based on the metabolic balance between photosynthesis and respiration as a function of MLD and temperature. We find that the upper bound is a positively skewed bell-shaped function of MLD. Specifically, the upper bound increases with deepening mixed layers down to a critical depth, beyond which a long tail of decreasing carbon export is associated with increasing heterotrophic activity and decreasing light availability. We also show that in cold regions the upper bound on carbon export decreases with increasing temperature when mixed layers are deep, but increases with temperature when mixed layers are shallow. A metaanalysis shows that our model envelopes field estimates of carbon export from the mixed layer. When compared to satellite export production estimates, our model indicates that export production in some regions of the Southern Ocean, most particularly the Subantarctic Zone, is likely limited by light for a significant portion of the growing season.


2014 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1897-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. S. Franks

Abstract Sverdrup (1953. On conditions for the vernal blooming of phytoplankton. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 18: 287–295) was quite careful in formulating his critical depth hypothesis, specifying a “thoroughly mixed top layer” with mixing “strong enough to distribute the plankton organisms evenly through the layer”. With a few notable exceptions, most subsequent tests of the critical depth hypothesis have ignored those assumptions, using estimates of a hydrographically defined mixed-layer depth as a proxy for the actual turbulence-driven movement of the phytoplankton. However, a closer examination of the sources of turbulence and stratification in turbulent layers shows that active turbulence is highly variable over time scales of hours, vertical scales of metres, and horizontal scales of kilometres. Furthermore, the mixed layer as defined by temperature or density gradients is a poor indicator of the depth or intensity of active turbulence. Without time series of coincident, in situ measurements of turbulence and phytoplankton rates, it is not possible to properly test Sverdrup's critical depth hypothesis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1029-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Carton ◽  
Semyon A. Grodsky ◽  
Hailong Liu

Abstract A new monthly uniformly gridded analysis of mixed layer properties based on the World Ocean Atlas 2005 global ocean dataset is used to examine interannual and longer changes in mixed layer properties during the 45-yr period 1960–2004. The analysis reveals substantial variability in the winter–spring depth of the mixed layer in the subtropics and midlatitudes. In the North Pacific an empirical orthogonal function analysis shows a pattern of mixed layer depth variability peaking in the central subtropics. This pattern occurs coincident with intensification of local surface winds and may be responsible for the SST changes associated with the Pacific decadal oscillation. Years with deep winter–spring mixed layers coincide with years in which winter–spring SST is low. In the North Atlantic a pattern of winter–spring mixed layer depth variability occurs that is not so obviously connected to local changes in winds or SST, suggesting that other processes such as advection are more important. Interestingly, at decadal periods the winter–spring mixed layers of both basins show trends, deepening by 10–40 m over the 45-yr period of this analysis. The long-term mixed layer deepening is even stronger (50–100 m) in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre. At tropical latitudes the boreal winter mixed layer varies in phase with the Southern Oscillation index, deepening in the eastern Pacific and shallowing in the western Pacific and eastern Indian Oceans during El Niños. In boreal summer the mixed layer in the Arabian Sea region of the western Indian Ocean varies in response to changes in the strength of the southwest monsoon.


2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1916-1925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Lévy

Abstract The critical depth hypothesis (CDH) is a predictive criteria for the onset of phytoplankton blooms that comes from the steady-state analytical solution of a simple mathematical model for phytoplankton growth presented by Sverdrup in 1953. Sverdrup's phytoplankton-only model is very elementary compared with state-of-the-art ecosystem models whose numerical solution in a time-varying environment do not systematically conform to the CDH. To highlight which model ingredients make the bloom onset deviate from the CDH, the complexity of Sverdrup's model is incrementally increased, and the impact that each new level of complexity introduced is analysed. Complexity is added both to the ecosystem model and to the parameterization of physical forcing. In the most complete experiment, the model is a one-dimensional Nutrient-Phytoplankton-Zooplankton model that includes seasonally varying mixed layer depth and surface irradiance, light and nutrient limitation, variable grazing, self-shading, export, and remineralization. When complexity is added to the ecosystem model, it is found that the model solution only marginally deviates from the CDH. But when the physical forcing is also changed, the model solution can conform to two competing theories for the onset of phytoplankton blooms—the critical turbulence hypothesis and the disturbance recovery hypothesis. The key roles of three physical ingredients on the bloom onset are highlighted: the intensity of vertical mixing at the end of winter, the seasonal evolution of the mixed-layer depth from the previous summer, and the seasonal evolution of surface irradiance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 3141-3156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew H. Alford

AbstractThe wind generation of near-inertial waves is revisited through use of the Pollard–Rhines–Thompson theory, the Price–Weller–Pinkel (PWP) mixed layer model, and KPP simulations of resonant forcing by Crawford and Large. An Argo mixed layer climatology and 0.6° MERRA-2 reanalysis winds are used to compute global totals and explore hypotheses. First, slab models overestimate wind work by factors of 2–4 when the mixed layer is shallow relative to the scaling H* ≡ u*/(Nf)1/2, but are accurate for deeper mixed layers, giving overestimation of global totals by a factor of 1.23 ± 0.03 compared to PWP. Using wind stress relative to the ocean currents further reduces the wind work by an additional 13 ± 0.3%, for a global total wind work of 0.26 TW. Second, the potential energy increase ΔPE due to wind-driven mixed layer deepening is examined and compared to ΔPE computed from Argo and ERA-Interim heat flux climatology. Argo-derived ΔPE closely matches cooling, confirming that cooling sets the seasonal cycle of mixed layer depth and providing a new constraint on observational estimates of convective buoyancy flux at the mixed layer base. Locally and in fall, wind-driven deepening is comparable in importance to cooling. Globally, wind-driven ΔPE is about 11% of wind work, implying that >50% of wind work goes to turbulence and thus not into propagating inertial motions. The fraction into this “modified wind work” is imperfectly estimated in two ways, but we conclude that more research is needed into mixed layer and transition-layer physics. The power available for propagating near-inertial waves is therefore still uncertain, but appears lower than previously thought.


Ocean Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheriyeri P. Abdulla ◽  
Mohammed A. Alsaafani ◽  
Turki M. Alraddadi ◽  
Alaa M. Albarakati

Abstract. For the first time, a monthly climatology of mixed layer depth (MLD) in the Red Sea has been derived based on temperature profiles. The general pattern of MLD variability is clearly visible in the Red Sea, with deep MLDs during winter and shallow MLDs during summer. Transitional MLDs have been found during the spring and fall. The northern end of the Red Sea experienced deeper mixing and a higher MLD associated with the winter cooling of the high-saline surface waters. Further, the region north of 19° N experienced deep mixed layers, regardless of the season. Wind stress plays a major role in the MLD variability of the southern Red Sea, while net heat flux and evaporation are the dominating factors in the central and northern Red Sea regions. Ocean eddies and Tokar Gap winds significantly alter the MLD structure in the Red Sea. The dynamics associated with the Tokar Gap winds leads to a difference of more than 20 m in the average MLD between the north and south of the Tokar axis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Tréguier ◽  
Torben Koenigk ◽  
Iovino Doroteaciro ◽  
Lique Camille ◽  
David Docquier

<p>Atlantic water flows over the Greenland-Iceland-Scotland Ridge into the Norwegian Sea. Along its path towards the Arctic, the Atlantic water is cooled by strong air-sea fluxes. Deep winter mixed layers modify the stratification and properties of the Atlantic water and precondition its flow into the Arctic, thus influencing Arctic sea ice and climate. Atlantic water also recirculates in the Greenland sea where deep water formation contributes to the dense limb of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. It is thus of paramount importance to represent mixed layer deepening and lateral heat exchanges processes in the Nordic Seas in climate models.</p><p>Heat exchanges in the Nordic Seas are influenced by narrow current branches, instabilities and eddies, which are not accurately represented in low resolution climate model (with grid ~ 50-100km).  Here we examine the mixed layer dynamics and heat exchanges using the latest generation of European high resolution global coupled models in the framework of HighResMip (5-15km grids in the Nordic Seas). We investigate in detail the effect of model resolution on the mixed layer depth and water mass formation in relation with the Atlantic water circulation and modification between the Norwegian and the Greenland Sea. First results show an increased northward ocean heat transport, a more realistic representation of the ocean current system in the Nordic Seas, and consequently an improved spatial distribution of the turbulent surface heat flux compared to standard resolution CMIP6 models. The mixed layer depth itself however varies strongly between different HighResMIP models. Summarizing, our assessment of the high resolution coupled simulations of the historical period demonstrates that future climate projections at high resolution have a huge potential, but also limitations.</p>


Ocean Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Castro-Morales ◽  
J. Kaiser

Abstract. Concentrations of oxygen (O2) and other dissolved gases in the oceanic mixed layer are often used to calculate air-sea gas exchange fluxes. The mixed layer depth (zmix) may be defined using criteria based on temperature or density differences to a reference depth near the ocean surface. However, temperature criteria fail in regions with strong haloclines such as the Southern Ocean where heat, freshwater and momentum fluxes interact to establish mixed layers. Moreover, the time scales of air-sea exchange differ for gases and heat, so that zmix defined using oxygen may be different than zmix defined using temperature or density. Here, we propose to define an O2-based mixed layer depth, zmix(O2), as the depth where the relative difference between the O2 concentration and a reference value at a depth equivalent to 10 dbar equals 0.5 %. This definition was established by analysis of O2 profiles from the Bellingshausen Sea (west of the Antarctic Peninsula) and corroborated by visual inspection. Comparisons of zmix(O2) with zmix based on potential temperature differences, i.e., zmix(0.2 °C) and zmix(0.5 °C), and potential density differences, i.e., zmix(0.03 kg m−3) and zmix(0.125 kg m−3), showed that zmix(O2) closely follows zmix(0.03 kg m−3). Further comparisons with published zmix climatologies and zmix derived from World Ocean Atlas 2005 data were also performed. To establish zmix for use with biological production estimates in the absence of O2 profiles, we suggest using zmix(0.03 kg m−3), which is also the basis for the climatology by de Boyer Montégut et al. (2004).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document