scholarly journals Evaluation of the boundary layer dynamics of the TM5 model over Europe

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 3137-3160 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. N. Koffi ◽  
P. Bergamaschi ◽  
U. Karstens ◽  
M. Krol ◽  
A. Segers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Activity Concentration ◽  
Transition Period ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Activity Concentrations ◽  
Boundary Layer Dynamics ◽  
Relative Differences

Abstract. We evaluate the capability of the global atmospheric transport model TM5 to simulate the boundary layer dynamics and associated variability of trace gases close to the surface, using radon (222Rn). Focusing on the European scale, we compare the boundary layer height (BLH) in the TM5 model with observations from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admnistration (NOAA) Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA) and also with ceilometer and lidar (light detection and ranging) BLH retrievals at two stations. Furthermore, we compare TM5 simulations of 222Rn activity concentrations, using a novel, process-based 222Rn flux map over Europe (Karstens et al., 2015), with harmonised 222Rn measurements at 10 stations. The TM5 model reproduces relatively well the daytime BLH (within 10–20 % for most of the stations), except for coastal sites, for which differences are usually larger due to model representation errors. During night, however, TM5 overestimates the shallow nocturnal BLHs, especially for the very low observed BLHs (< 100 m) during summer. The 222Rn activity concentration simulations based on the new 222Rn flux map show significant improvements especially regarding the average seasonal variability, compared to simulations using constant 222Rn fluxes. Nevertheless, the (relative) differences between simulated and observed daytime minimum 222Rn activity concentrations are larger for several stations (on the order of 50 %) than the (relative) differences between simulated and observed BLH at noon. Although the nocturnal BLH is often higher in the model than observed, simulated 222Rn nighttime maxima are actually larger at several continental stations. This counterintuitive behaviour points to potential deficiencies of TM5 to correctly simulate the vertical gradients within the nocturnal boundary layer, limitations of the 222Rn flux map, or issues related to the definition of the nocturnal BLH. At several stations the simulated decrease of 222Rn activity concentrations in the morning is faster than observed. In addition, simulated vertical 222Rn activity concentration gradients at Cabauw decrease faster than observations during the morning transition period, and are in general lower than observed gradients during daytime. Although these effects may be partially due to the slow response time of the radon detectors, they clearly point to too fast vertical mixing in the TM5 boundary layer during daytime. Furthermore, the capability of the TM5 model to simulate the diurnal BLH cycle is limited by the current coarse temporal resolution (3 h/6 h) of the TM5 input meteorology.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the boundary layer dynamics of the TM5 model

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. N. Koffi ◽  
P. Bergamaschi ◽  
U. Karstens ◽  
M. Krol ◽  
A. Segers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Activity Concentration ◽  
Transition Period ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Activity Concentrations ◽  
Boundary Layer Dynamics ◽  
Relative Differences ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. We evaluate the capability of the global atmospheric transport model TM5 to reproduce observations of the boundary layer dynamics and the associated variability of trace gases close to the surface, using radon (222Rn), which is an excellent tracer for vertical mixing owing to its short lifetime (half-life) of 3.82 days. Focusing on the European scale, we compare the boundary layer height (BLH) in the TM5 model with observations from the NOAA Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA) and in addition with ceilometer measurements at Cabauw (The Netherlands) and lidar BLH retrievals at Trainou (France). Furthermore, we compare TM5 simulations of 222Rn activity concentrations, using a novel, process-based 222Rn flux map over Europe (Karstens et al., 2015), with quasi-continuous 222Rn measurements from 10 European monitoring stations. The TM5 model reproduces relatively well the daytime BLH (within ~ 10–20 % for most of the stations), except for coastal sites, for which differences are usually larger due to model representation errors. During night, TM5 overestimates the shallow nocturnal BLHs, especially for the very low observed BLHs (< 100 m) during summer. The 222Rn activity concentration simulations based on the new 222Rn flux map show significant improvements especially regarding the average seasonal variability, compared to simulations using constant 222Rn fluxes. Nevertheless, the (relative) differences between simulated and observed daytime minimum 222Rn activity concentrations are larger for several stations (on the order of 50 %) compared to the (relative) differences between simulated and observed BLH at noon. Although the nocturnal BLH is often higher in the model than observed, simulated 222Rn nighttime maxima are larger at several continental stations, which points to potential deficiencies of TM5 to correctly simulate the vertical gradients within the nocturnal boundary layer, limitations of the 222Rn flux map, or issues related to the definition of the nocturnal BLH. At several stations the simulated decrease of 222Rn activity concentrations in the morning is faster than observed. In addition, simulated vertical 222Rn activity concentration gradients at Cabauw decrease faster than observations during the morning transition period, and are in general lower than observed gradients during daytime, which points to too fast vertical mixing in the TM5 boundary layer during daytime. Furthermore, the capability of the TM5 model to simulate the diurnal BLH cycle is limited due to the current coarse temporal resolution (3 hr/6 hr) of the TM5 input meteorology. Additionally, we analyze the impact of a new treatment of convection in TM5, based on the ECMWF reanalysis, leading to overall significantly lower (on the order of ~ 20 %) surface 222Rn activity concentrations during daytime compared to the current default convection scheme based on Tiedtke (1989). However, the performance of the model simulations compared to the 222Rn observations is very similar in terms of root mean square and correlation coefficient for both convection schemes.

scholarly journals The constraint of CO<sub>2</sub> measurements made onboard passenger aircraft on surface-atmosphere fluxes: the impact of transport model errors in vertical mixing

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreeya Verma ◽  
Julia Marshall ◽  
Christoph Gerbig ◽  
Christian Roedenbeck ◽  
Kai Uwe Totsche
Keyword(s):  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Inaccurate representation of atmospheric processes by transport models is a dominant source of uncertainty in inverse analyses and can lead to large discrepancies in the retrieved flux estimates. We investigate the impact of uncertainties in vertical transport as simulated by atmospheric transport models on fluxes retrieved using vertical profiles from aircraft as an observational constraint. Our numerical experiments are based on synthetic data with realistic spatial and temporal sampling of aircraft measurements. The impact of such uncertainties on the flux retrieved using the ground-based network with those retrieved using the aircraft profiles are compared. We find that the posterior flux retrieved using aircraft profiles is less susceptible to errors in boundary layer height as compared to the ground- based network. This highlights the benefit of utilizing atmospheric observations made onboard aircraft over surface measurements for flux estimation using inverse methods. We further use synthetic vertical profiles of CO2 in an inversion to estimate the potential of these measurements, which will be made available through the IAGOS (In-Service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) project in future, in constraining the regional carbon budget. Our results show that the regions tropical Africa and temperate Eurasia, that are under constrained by the existing surface based network, will benefit the most from these measurements, the reduction of posterior flux uncertainty being about 7 to 10 %.

scholarly journals Using boundary layer equilibrium to reduce uncertainties in transport models and CO<sub>2</sub> flux inversions

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 9631-9641 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Williams ◽  
W. J. Riley ◽  
M. S. Torn ◽  
J. A. Berry ◽  
S. C. Biraud
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Systematic Errors ◽  
Surface Fluxes ◽  
Concentration Gradients ◽  
Layer Depth ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Mixing Rates

Abstract. This paper reexamines evidence for systematic errors in atmospheric transport models, in terms of the diagnostics used to infer vertical mixing rates from models and observations. Different diagnostics support different conclusions about transport model errors that could imply either stronger or weaker northern terrestrial carbon sinks. Conventional mixing diagnostics are compared to analyzed vertical mixing rates using data from the US Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility, the CarbonTracker data assimilation system based on Transport Model version 5 (TM5), and atmospheric reanalyses. The results demonstrate that diagnostics based on boundary layer depth and vertical concentration gradients do not always indicate the vertical mixing strength. Vertical mixing rates are anti-correlated with boundary layer depth at some sites, diminishing in summer when the boundary layer is deepest. Boundary layer equilibrium concepts predict an inverse proportionality between CO2 vertical gradients and vertical mixing strength, such that previously reported discrepancies between observations and models most likely reflect overestimated as opposed to underestimated vertical mixing. However, errors in seasonal concentration gradients can also result from errors in modeled surface fluxes. This study proposes using the timescale for approach to boundary layer equilibrium to diagnose vertical mixing independently of seasonal surface fluxes, with applications to observations and model simulations of CO2 or other conserved boundary layer tracers with surface sources and sinks. Results indicate that frequently cited discrepancies between observations and inverse estimates do not provide sufficient proof of systematic errors in atmospheric transport models. Some previously hypothesized transport model biases, if found and corrected, could cause inverse estimates to further diverge from carbon inventory estimates of terrestrial sinks.

Assessment of regional atmospheric transport model performance using 222Radon observations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute Karstens ◽  
Ingeborg Levin ◽  
Michel Ramonet ◽  
Christoph Gerbig ◽  
Sabrina Arnold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Activity Concentration ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Transport Processes ◽  
Exhalation Rate ◽  
Mixing Processes ◽  
Radon Activity

&lt;p&gt;The rather short life time of &lt;sup&gt;222&lt;/sup&gt;Radon of 5.5 days makes this radioactive noble gas an almost ideal tracer of atmospheric transport processes. &lt;sup&gt;222&lt;/sup&gt;Radon, the gaseous progeny of &lt;sup&gt;226&lt;/sup&gt;Radium, which is a trace constituent of all soils, can escape the soil grains and make its way from the unsaturated soil zone into the atmosphere. The exhalation rate of &lt;sup&gt;222&lt;/sup&gt;Radon from continental surfaces depends on soil type and permeability, but is orders of magnitude larger than that from ocean surfaces. Therefore, the atmospheric &lt;sup&gt;222&lt;/sup&gt;Radon activity concentration can be used as a measure of the residence time of air over continental surfaces or to distinguish continental from marine air masses. At continental sites, the short-term variability of &lt;sup&gt;222&lt;/sup&gt;Radon is mainly determined by diurnal or synoptic-scale boundary layer mixing processes. If its continental exhalation rate is known, &lt;sup&gt;222&lt;/sup&gt;Radon can even be applied as a quantitative tracer for evaluating regional scale transport model performance. In the present study we use &lt;sup&gt;222&lt;/sup&gt;Radon activity concentration measurements from the ICOS atmospheric station network and STILT transport model results to assess the ability of this routinely used model to correctly simulate the (diurnal) variation of boundary layer transport. This uncertainty assessment is an important step towards reliable estimates of the contribution of transport model error in GHGs inversion studies that aim at providing accurate fluxes from inversion of atmospheric GHGs observations in ICOS.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Using boundary layer equilibrium to reduce uncertainties in transport models and CO<sub>2</sub> flux inversions

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 11455-11495 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Williams ◽  
W. J. Riley ◽  
M. S. Torn ◽  
J. A. Berry ◽  
S. C. Biraud
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Co2 Flux ◽  
Surface Fluxes ◽  
Layer Depth ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Mixing Rates ◽  
Systematic Biases

Abstract. This paper reexamines evidence for previously hypothesized errors in atmospheric transport models and CO2 flux inversions by evaluating the diagnostics used to infer vertical mixing rates from observations. Several conventional mixing diagnostics are compared to analyzed mixing using data from the US Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility, the CarbonTracker data assimilation system based on Transport Model version 5 (TM5), and atmospheric reanalyses. The results demonstrate that previous diagnostics based on boundary layer depth and vertical concentration gradients are unreliable indicators of vertical mixing. Vertical mixing rates are anti-correlated with boundary layer depth at some sites, diminishing in summer when the boundary layer is deepest. Vertical CO2 gradients between the boundary layer and free-troposphere are strongly affected by seasonal surface fluxes and therefore do not accurately reflect vertical mixing rates. The finite timescale over which vertical tracer gradients relax toward equilibrium is proposed as an improved mixing diagnostic, which can be applied to observations and model simulations of CO2 or other conserved boundary layer tracers with surface sources and sinks. This diagnostic does not require dynamical variables from the transport models, and is independent of possible systematic biases in prior- and post-inversion seasonal surface fluxes. Results indicate that observations frequently cited as evidence for systematic biases in atmospheric transport models are insufficient to prove that such biases exist. Some previously hypothesized transport model biases, if found and corrected, could cause inverse estimates to further diverge from land-based estimates.

scholarly journals The constraint of CO<sub>2</sub> measurements made onboard passenger aircraft on surface–atmosphere fluxes: the impact of transport model errors in vertical mixing

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 5665-5675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shreeya Verma ◽  
Julia Marshall ◽  
Christoph Gerbig ◽  
Christian Rödenbeck ◽  
Kai Uwe Totsche
Keyword(s):  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Vertical Profiles ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Inaccurate representation of atmospheric processes by transport models is a dominant source of uncertainty in inverse analyses and can lead to large discrepancies in the retrieved flux estimates. We investigate the impact of uncertainties in vertical transport as simulated by atmospheric transport models on fluxes retrieved using vertical profiles from aircraft as an observational constraint. Our numerical experiments are based on synthetic data with realistic spatial and temporal sampling of aircraft measurements. The impact of such uncertainties on the flux retrieved using the ground-based network and those retrieved using the aircraft profiles are compared. We find that the posterior flux retrieved using aircraft profiles is less susceptible to errors in boundary layer height, compared to the ground-based network. This finding highlights a benefit of utilizing atmospheric observations made onboard aircraft over surface measurements for flux estimation using inverse methods. We further use synthetic vertical profiles of CO2 in an inversion to estimate the potential of these measurements, which will be made available through the IAGOS (In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) project in the future, in constraining the regional carbon budget. Our results show that the regions of tropical Africa and temperate Eurasia, that are under-constrained by the existing surface-based network, will benefit the most from these measurements, with a reduction of posterior flux uncertainty of about 7 to 10 %.

Tropical Cyclone Intensification Simulated in the Ooyama-type Three-layer Model with a Multilevel Boundary Layer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Fei ◽  
Yuqing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Tropical Cyclone ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Type Model ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Coriolis Parameter ◽  
Wind Structure ◽  
Model Configuration ◽  
Nonlinear Advection ◽  
Boundary Layer Dynamics

AbstractThe first successful simulation of tropical cyclone (TC) intensification was achieved with a three-layer model, often named the Ooyama-type three-layer model, which consists of a slab boundary layer and two shallow water layers above. Later studies showed that the use of a slab boundary layer would produce unrealistic boundary layer wind structure and too strong eyewall updraft at the top of TC boundary layer and thus simulate unrealistically rapid intensification compared to the use of a height-parameterized boundary layer. To fully consider the highly height-dependent boundary layer dynamics in the Ooyama-type three-layer model, this study replaced the slab boundary layer with a multilevel boundary layer in the Ooyama-type model and used it to conduct simulations of TC intensification and also compared the simulation with that from the model version with a slab boundary layer. Results show that compared with the simulation with a slab boundary layer, the use of a multilevel boundary layer can greatly improve simulations of the boundary-layer wind structure and the strength and radial location of eyewall updraft, and thus more realistic intensification rate due to better treatments of the surface layer processes and the nonlinear advection terms in the boundary layer. Sensitivity of the simulated TCs to the model configuration and to both horizontal and vertical mixing lengths, sea surface temperature, the Coriolis parameter, and the initial TC vortex structure are also examined. The results demonstrate that this new model can reproduce various sensitivities comparable to those found in previous studies using fully physics models.

scholarly journals Sensitivity of simulated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration to sub-annual variations in fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> emissions

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1907-1918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Zhang ◽  
Kevin R. Gurney ◽  
Peter Rayner ◽  
David Baker ◽  
Yu-ping Liu
Keyword(s):  
Fossil Fuel ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Grid Cell ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Tracer Transport ◽  
Annual Variations ◽  
Atmospheric Co2 Concentrations ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Recent advances in fossil fuel CO2 (FFCO2) emission inventories enable sensitivity tests of simulated atmospheric CO2 concentrations to sub-annual variations in FFCO2 emissions and what this implies for the interpretation of observed CO2. Six experiments are conducted to investigate the potential impact of three cycles of FFCO2 emission variability (diurnal, weekly and monthly) using a global tracer transport model. Results show an annual FFCO2 rectification varying from −1.35 to +0.13 ppm from the combination of all three cycles. This rectification is driven by a large negative diurnal FFCO2 rectification due to the covariation of diurnal FFCO2 emissions and diurnal vertical mixing, as well as a smaller positive seasonal FFCO2 rectification driven by the covariation of monthly FFCO2 emissions and monthly atmospheric transport. The diurnal FFCO2 emissions are responsible for a diurnal FFCO2 concentration amplitude of up to 9.12 ppm at the grid cell scale. Similarly, the monthly FFCO2 emissions are responsible for a simulated seasonal CO2 amplitude of up to 6.11 ppm at the grid cell scale. The impact of the diurnal FFCO2 emissions, when only sampled in the local afternoon, is also important, causing an increase of +1.13 ppmv at the grid cell scale. The simulated CO2 concentration impacts from the diurnally and seasonally varying FFCO2 emissions are centered over large source regions in the Northern Hemisphere, extending to downwind regions. This study demonstrates the influence of sub-annual variations in FFCO2 emissions on simulated CO2 concentration and suggests that inversion studies must take account of these variations in the affected regions.

scholarly journals Evaluating a 3-D transport model of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> using ground-based, aircraft, and space-borne data

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 18025-18061 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Feng ◽  
P. I. Palmer ◽  
Y. Yang ◽  
R. M. Yantosca ◽  
S. R. Kawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
North America ◽  
Seasonal Cycle ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Atmospheric Transport ◽  
Co2 Fluxes ◽  
A Posteriori ◽  
Upper Troposphere ◽  
Co2 Concentrations ◽  
Geographical Regions

Abstract. We evaluate the GEOS-Chem atmospheric transport model (v8-02-01) of CO2 over 2003–2006, driven by GEOS-4 and GEOS-5 meteorology from the NASA Goddard Global Modelling and Assimilation Office, using surface, aircraft and space-borne concentration measurements of CO2. We use an established ensemble Kalman filter to estimate a posteriori biospheric+biomass burning (BS+BB) and oceanic (OC) CO2 fluxes from 22 geographical regions, following the TransCom 3 protocol, using boundary layer CO2 data from a subset of GLOBALVIEW surface sites. Global annual net BS+BB+OC CO2 fluxes over 2004–2006 for GEOS-4 (GEOS-5) meteorology are −4.4±0.9 (−4.2±0.9), −3.9±0.9 (−4.5±0.9), and −5.2±0.9 (−4.9±0.9) Pg C yr−1 , respectively. The regional a posteriori fluxes are broadly consistent in the sign and magnitude of the TransCom-3 study for 1992–1996, but we find larger net sinks over northern and southern continents. We find large departures from our a priori over Europe during summer 2003, over temperate Eurasia during 2004, and over North America during 2005, reflecting an incomplete description of terrestrial carbon dynamics. We find GEOS-4 (GEOS-5) a posteriori CO2 concentrations reproduce the observed surface trend of 1.91–2.43 ppm yr−1, depending on latitude, within 0.15 ppm yr−1 (0.2 ppm yr−1) and the seasonal cycle within 0.2 ppm (0.2 ppm) at all latitudes. We find the a posteriori model reproduces the aircraft vertical profile measurements of CO2 over North America and Siberia generally within 1.5 ppm in the free and upper troposphere but can be biased by up to 4–5 ppm in the boundary layer at the start and end of the growing season. The model has a small negative bias in the free troposphere CO2 trend (1.95–2.19 ppm yr−1) compared to AIRS data which has a trend of 2.21–2.63 ppm yr−1 during 2004–2006, consistent with surface data. Model CO2 concentrations in the upper troposphere, evaluated using CONTRAIL (Comprehensive Observation Network for TRace gases by AIrLiner) aircraft measurements, reproduce the magnitude and phase of the seasonal cycle of CO2 in both hemispheres. We generally find that the GEOS meteorology reproduces much of the observed tropospheric CO2 variability, suggesting that these meteorological fields will help make significant progress in understanding carbon fluxes as more data become available.

scholarly journals The HD(CP)<sup>2</sup> Observational Prototype Experiment (HOPE) – an overview

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 4887-4914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Macke ◽  
Patric Seifert ◽  
Holger Baars ◽  
Christian Barthlott ◽  
Christoph Beekmans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Water Vapour ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Boundary Layer Height ◽  
Microphysical Properties ◽  
Boundary Layer Dynamics ◽  
Macrophysical Properties ◽  
Microwave Radiometers

Abstract. The HD(CP)2 Observational Prototype Experiment (HOPE) was performed as a major 2-month field experiment in Jülich, Germany, in April and May 2013, followed by a smaller campaign in Melpitz, Germany, in September 2013. HOPE has been designed to provide an observational dataset for a critical evaluation of the new German community atmospheric icosahedral non-hydrostatic (ICON) model at the scale of the model simulations and further to provide information on land-surface–atmospheric boundary layer exchange, cloud and precipitation processes, as well as sub-grid variability and microphysical properties that are subject to parameterizations. HOPE focuses on the onset of clouds and precipitation in the convective atmospheric boundary layer. This paper summarizes the instrument set-ups, the intensive observation periods, and example results from both campaigns. HOPE-Jülich instrumentation included a radio sounding station, 4 Doppler lidars, 4 Raman lidars (3 of them provide temperature, 3 of them water vapour, and all of them particle backscatter data), 1 water vapour differential absorption lidar, 3 cloud radars, 5 microwave radiometers, 3 rain radars, 6 sky imagers, 99 pyranometers, and 5 sun photometers operated at different sites, some of them in synergy. The HOPE-Melpitz campaign combined ground-based remote sensing of aerosols and clouds with helicopter- and balloon-based in situ observations in the atmospheric column and at the surface. HOPE provided an unprecedented collection of atmospheric dynamical, thermodynamical, and micro- and macrophysical properties of aerosols, clouds, and precipitation with high spatial and temporal resolution within a cube of approximately 10  ×  10  ×  10 km3. HOPE data will significantly contribute to our understanding of boundary layer dynamics and the formation of clouds and precipitation. The datasets have been made available through a dedicated data portal. First applications of HOPE data for model evaluation have shown a general agreement between observed and modelled boundary layer height, turbulence characteristics, and cloud coverage, but they also point to significant differences that deserve further investigations from both the observational and the modelling perspective.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document