scholarly journals Convection-permitting regional climate simulations for representing floods in small- and medium-sized catchments in the Eastern Alps

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 2653-2674
Author(s):  
Christian Reszler ◽  
Matthew Blaise Switanek ◽  
Heimo Truhetz
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Eastern Alps ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Model Framework ◽  
Small Catchment ◽  
Flood Modelling ◽  
Flood Generation

Abstract. Small-scale floods are a consequence of high precipitation rates in small areas that can occur along frontal activity and convective storms. This situation is expected to become more severe due to a warming climate, when single precipitation events resulting from deep convection become more intense (super Clausius–Clapeyron effect). Regional climate model (RCM) evaluations and inter-comparisons have shown that there is evidence that an increase in RCM resolution and, in particular, at the convection-permitting scale will lead to a better representation of the spatial and temporal characteristics of heavy precipitation at small and medium scales. In this paper, the benefits of grid size reduction and bias correction in climate models are evaluated in their ability to properly represent flood generation in small- and medium-sized catchments. The climate models are sequentially coupled with a distributed hydrological model. The study area is the Eastern Alps, where small-scale storms often occur along with heterogeneous rainfall distributions leading to a very local flash flood generation. The work is carried out in a small multi-model framework using two different RCMs (CCLM and WRF) in different grid sizes. Bias correction is performed by the use of the novel scaled distribution mapping (SDM), which is similar to the usual quantile mapping (QM) method. The results show that, in the investigated RCM ensemble, no clear added value of the usage of convection-permitting RCMs for the purpose of flood modelling can be found. This is based on the fact that flood events are the consequence of an interplay between the total precipitation amount per event and the temporal distribution of rainfall intensities on a sub-daily scale. The RCM ensemble is lacking in one and/or the other. In the small catchment (<100 km2), a favourable superposition of the errors leads to seemingly good CCLM 3 km results both for flood statistics and seasonal occurrence. This is, however, not systematic across the catchments. The applied bias correction only corrects total event rainfall amounts in an attempt to reduce systematic errors on a seasonal basis. It does not account for errors in the temporal dynamics and deteriorates the results in the small catchment. Therefore, it cannot be recommended for flood modelling.

scholarly journals Convection-permitting regional climate simulations for representing floods in small and medium sized catchments in the Eastern Alps

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Reszler ◽  
Matthew Blasie Switanek ◽  
Heimo Truhetz
Keyword(s):  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Eastern Alps ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Flood Generation

Abstract. Small scale floods are a consequence of high precipitation rates in small areas that can occur along frontal activity and convective storms. This situation is expected to become more severe due to a warming climate, when single precipitation events resulting from deep convection become more intense (Super Clausius-Clapeyron effect). Regional climate model (RCM) evaluations and inter-comparisons have shown that there is evidence that an increase in regional climate model resolution and in particular, at the convection permitting scale, will lead to a better representation of the spatial and temporal characteristics of heavy precipitation at small and medium scales. In this paper, the benefit of grid size reduction and bias correction in climate models are evaluated in their ability to properly represent flood generation in small and medium sized catchments. The climate models are coupled with a distributed hydrological model. The study area is the Eastern Alps, where small scale storms often occur along with heterogeneous rainfall distributions leading to a very local flash flood generation. The work is carried out in a small multi-model (ensemble) framework using two different RCMs (CCLM and WRF) in different grid sizes. Bias correction is performed by the use of the novel Scaled Distribution Mapping (SDM) method. The results show, that for small catchments (

scholarly journals Projecting Health Impacts of Future Temperature: A Comparison of Quantile-Mapping Bias-Correction Methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1992
Author(s):  
Weijia Qian ◽  
Howard H. Chang
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Warm Season ◽  
Climate Science ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Ed Visits

Health impact assessments of future environmental exposures are routinely conducted to quantify population burdens associated with the changing climate. It is well-recognized that simulations from climate models need to be bias-corrected against observations to estimate future exposures. Quantile mapping (QM) is a technique that has gained popularity in climate science because of its focus on bias-correcting the entire exposure distribution. Even though improved bias-correction at the extreme tails of exposure may be particularly important for estimating health burdens, the application of QM in health impact projection has been limited. In this paper we describe and apply five QM methods to estimate excess emergency department (ED) visits due to projected changes in warm-season minimum temperature in Atlanta, USA. We utilized temperature projections from an ensemble of regional climate models in the North American-Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (NA-CORDEX). Across QM methods, we estimated consistent increase in ED visits across climate model ensemble under RCP 8.5 during the period 2050 to 2099. We found that QM methods can significantly reduce between-model variation in health impact projections (50–70% decreases in between-model standard deviation). Particularly, the quantile delta mapping approach had the largest reduction and is recommended also because of its ability to preserve model-projected absolute temporal changes in quantiles.

scholarly journals New Approach for Bias Correction and Stochastic Downscaling of Future Projections for Daily Mean Temperatures to a High-Resolution Grid

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 2617-2632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qifen Yuan ◽  
Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir ◽  
Stein Beldring ◽  
Wai Kwok Wong ◽  
Shaochun Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Climate Change Signal ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Data Product ◽  
Temporal Features ◽  
Stochastic Downscaling

AbstractIn applications of climate information, coarse-resolution climate projections commonly need to be downscaled to a finer grid. One challenge of this requirement is the modeling of subgrid variability and the spatial and temporal dependence at the finer scale. Here, a postprocessing procedure for temperature projections is proposed that addresses this challenge. The procedure employs statistical bias correction and stochastic downscaling in two steps. In the first step, errors that are related to spatial and temporal features of the first two moments of the temperature distribution at model scale are identified and corrected. Second, residual space–time dependence at the finer scale is analyzed using a statistical model, from which realizations are generated and then combined with an appropriate climate change signal to form the downscaled projection fields. Using a high-resolution observational gridded data product, the proposed approach is applied in a case study in which projections of two regional climate models from the Coordinated Downscaling Experiment–European Domain (EURO-CORDEX) ensemble are bias corrected and downscaled to a 1 km × 1 km grid in the Trøndelag area of Norway. A cross-validation study shows that the proposed procedure generates results that better reflect the marginal distributional properties of the data product and have better consistency in space and time when compared with empirical quantile mapping.

scholarly journals Impact of climate change on hydrological conditions in a tropical West African catchment using an ensemble of climate simulations

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 2143-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yacouba Yira ◽  
Bernd Diekkrüger ◽  
Gero Steup ◽  
Aymar Yaovi Bossa
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
West African ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Impact Of Climate Change ◽  
Budget Analysis ◽  
High Uncertainty

Abstract. This study evaluates climate change impacts on water resources using an ensemble of six regional climate models (RCMs)–global climate models (GCMs) in the Dano catchment (Burkina Faso). The applied climate datasets were performed in the framework of the COordinated Regional climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX-Africa) project.After evaluation of the historical runs of the climate models' ensemble, a statistical bias correction (empirical quantile mapping) was applied to daily precipitation. Temperature and bias corrected precipitation data from the ensemble of RCMs–GCMs was then used as input for the Water flow and balance Simulation Model (WaSiM) to simulate water balance components.The mean hydrological and climate variables for two periods (1971–2000 and 2021–2050) were compared to assess the potential impact of climate change on water resources up to the middle of the 21st century under two greenhouse gas concentration scenarios, the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5. The results indicate (i) a clear signal of temperature increase of about 0.1 to 2.6 °C for all members of the RCM–GCM ensemble; (ii) high uncertainty about how the catchment precipitation will evolve over the period 2021–2050; (iii) the applied bias correction method only affected the magnitude of the climate change signal; (iv) individual climate models results lead to opposite discharge change signals; and (v) the results for the RCM–GCM ensemble are too uncertain to give any clear direction for future hydrological development. Therefore, potential increase and decrease in future discharge have to be considered in climate change adaptation strategies in the catchment. The results further underline on the one hand the need for a larger ensemble of projections to properly estimate the impacts of climate change on water resources in the catchment and on the other hand the high uncertainty associated with climate projections for the West African region. A water-energy budget analysis provides further insight into the behavior of the catchment.

Performance evaluation of bias adjustment methods for wave climate projections in the Mediterranean Sea

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Lira Loarca ◽  
Giovanni Besio
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Temporal Variability ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Wave Climate ◽  
Mapping Method ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Bias Adjustment ◽  
Distribution Mapping

&lt;p&gt;Global and regional climate models are the primary tools to investigate the climate system response to different scenarios and therefore allow to make future projections of different atmospheric variables which are used as input for wave generation models to assess future wave climate. Adequate projections of future wave climate are needed in order to analyze climate change impacts and hazards in coastal areas such as flooding and erosion with waves being the predominant factor with varied temporal variability.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bias adjustment methods are commonly used for climate impact variables dealing with systematic errors (biases) found in global and regional climate models.&amp;#160; While bias correction techniques are extended in the climate and hydrological impact modeling scientific communities, there is still a lack of consensus regarding their use in sea climate variables (Parker &amp; Hill, 2017; Lemos et al, 2020; Lira-Loarca et at, 2021)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In these work we assess the performance of different bias-adjustment methods such as the Empirical Gumbel Quantile Mapping (EGQM) method as a standard method which takes into the account the extreme values of the distribution takes, the Distribution Mapping method using Stationary Mixture Distributions (DM-stMix) allowing for a better representation of each variable in the mean regime and tails and the Distribution Mapping method using Non-Stationary Mixture Distributions (DM-nonstMix) as an improved methods which allows to take into account the temporal variability of wave climate according to different baseline periods such as monthly, seasonal, yearly and decadal. The performance of the different bias adjustment methods will be analyzed with particular interest on the futural temporal behavior of wave climate. The advantages and drawbacks of each bias adjustment method as well as their complexity will be discussed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;References:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lemos, G., Menendez, M., Semedo, A., Camus, P., Hemer, M., Dobrynin, M., Miranda, P.M.A. (2020). On the need of bias correction methods for wave climate projections, Global and Planetary Change, 186, 103109.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;Lira-Loarca, A., Cobos, M., Besio, G., Baquerizo, A. (2021) Projected wave climate temporal variability due to climate change. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;Parker, K. &amp; Hill, D.F. (2017) Evaluation of bias correction methods for wave modeling output, Ocean Modelling 110, 52-65&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Influence of Bias Correction Methods on Simulated Köppen−Geiger Climate Zones in Europe

Climate ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beáta Szabó-Takács ◽  
Aleš Farda ◽  
Petr Skalák ◽  
Jan Meitner
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Generalized Pareto Distribution ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Climate Classification ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Temperature Bias ◽  
Simulated Precipitation ◽  
Precipitation And Temperature

Our goal was to investigate the influence of bias correction methods on climate simulations over the European domain. We calculated the Köppen−Geiger climate classification using five individual regional climate models (RCM) of the ENSEMBLES project in the European domain during the period 1961−1990. The simulated precipitation and temperature data were corrected using the European daily high-resolution gridded dataset (E-OBS) observed data by five methods: (i) the empirical quantile mapping of precipitation and temperature, (ii) the quantile mapping of precipitation and temperature based on gamma and Generalized Pareto Distribution of precipitation, (iii) local intensity scaling, (iv) the power transformation of precipitation and (v) the variance scaling of temperature bias corrections. The individual bias correction methods had a significant effect on the climate classification, but the degree of this effect varied among the RCMs. Our results on the performance of bias correction differ from previous results described in the literature where these corrections were implemented over river catchments. We conclude that the effect of bias correction may depend on the region of model domain. These results suggest that distribution free bias correction approaches are the most suitable for large domain sizes such as the pan-European domain.

scholarly journals A method to preserve trends in quantile mapping bias correction of climate modeled temperature

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 889-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manolis G. Grillakis ◽  
Aristeidis G. Koutroulis ◽  
Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos ◽  
Ioannis K. Tsanis
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Temperature Bias ◽  
Mapping Bias ◽  
Temperature Signal ◽  
Change Impact

Abstract. Bias correction of climate variables is a standard practice in climate change impact (CCI) studies. Various methodologies have been developed within the framework of quantile mapping. However, it is well known that quantile mapping may significantly modify the long-term statistics due to the time dependency of the temperature bias. Here, a method to overcome this issue without compromising the day-to-day correction statistics is presented. The methodology separates the modeled temperature signal into a normalized and a residual component relative to the modeled reference period climatology, in order to adjust the biases only for the former and preserve the signal of the later. The results show that this method allows for the preservation of the originally modeled long-term signal in the mean, the standard deviation and higher and lower percentiles of temperature. To illustrate the improvements, the methodology is tested on daily time series obtained from five Euro CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs).

scholarly journals Are we using the right fuel to drive hydrological models? A climate impact study in the Upper Blue Nile

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 2163-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Liersch ◽  
Julia Tecklenburg ◽  
Henning Rust ◽  
Andreas Dobler ◽  
Madlen Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Climate Impact ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Blue Nile ◽  
Projected Change ◽  
Model Ensembles

Abstract. Climate simulations are the fuel to drive hydrological models that are used to assess the impacts of climate change and variability on hydrological parameters, such as river discharges, soil moisture, and evapotranspiration. Unlike with cars, where we know which fuel the engine requires, we never know in advance what unexpected side effects might be caused by the fuel we feed our models with. Sometimes we increase the fuel's octane number (bias correction) to achieve better performance and find out that the model behaves differently but not always as was expected or desired. This study investigates the impacts of projected climate change on the hydrology of the Upper Blue Nile catchment using two model ensembles consisting of five global CMIP5 Earth system models and 10 regional climate models (CORDEX Africa). WATCH forcing data were used to calibrate an eco-hydrological model and to bias-correct both model ensembles using slightly differing approaches. On the one hand it was found that the bias correction methods considerably improved the performance of average rainfall characteristics in the reference period (1970–1999) in most of the cases. This also holds true for non-extreme discharge conditions between Q20 and Q80. On the other hand, bias-corrected simulations tend to overemphasize magnitudes of projected change signals and extremes. A general weakness of both uncorrected and bias-corrected simulations is the rather poor representation of high and low flows and their extremes, which were often deteriorated by bias correction. This inaccuracy is a crucial deficiency for regional impact studies dealing with water management issues and it is therefore important to analyse model performance and characteristics and the effect of bias correction, and eventually to exclude some climate models from the ensemble. However, the multi-model means of all ensembles project increasing average annual discharges in the Upper Blue Nile catchment and a shift in seasonal patterns, with decreasing discharges in June and July and increasing discharges from August to November.

scholarly journals Impact Analysis of Univariate and Multivariate Bias Correction on Rice Irrigation Water Needs in Jiangxi Province, China

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 381
Author(s):  
Wido Hanggoro ◽  
Jing Yuanshu ◽  
Leila Cudemus ◽  
Jing Zhihao
Keyword(s):  
Irrigation Water ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Jiangxi Province ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Climate Variables ◽  
Calibration Period ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rice Irrigation

Regional climate models (RCMs) provide an improved representation of climate information as compared to global climate models (GCMs). However, in climate-agricultural impact studies, accurate and interdependent local-scale climate variables are preferable, but both RCMs and GCMs are still subjected to bias. This study compares univariate bias correction (UBC) and multivariate bias correction (MBC) method to simulate rice irrigation water needs (IWNs) in Jiangxi Province, China. This research uses the daily output of Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model version 3 regional climate model (HadGEM3-RA) forced with ERAINT (ECMWF ERA Interim) data and 13 Jiangxi ground-based observations, and the observation data are reference data with 1989–2005 defined as a calibration period and 2006–2007 as a validation period. The result shows that UBC and MBC methods favorably bias-corrected all climate variables during the calibration period, but still no significant difference is noted between the two methods. However, the UBC ignores the relationship between climate variables, while MBC preserves the climate variables’ interdependence which affect subsequent analyses. In rice IWNs simulation analysis, MBC has better skill at correcting bias compare to UBC in ETo (evapotranspiration) and Peff (effective rainfall) components. Nonetheless, both methods have a low ability to correct extreme values bias. Overall, both techniques successfully reduce bias, even though they are still less effective for precipitation compared to maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity and windspeed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document