LEGAL REGULATION OF THE PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING EXPLANATIONS IN THE STAGE OF EXCITATION OF THE CRIMINAL CASE: PROBLEMS AND WAYS OF THE DECISION

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Ovsyannikov
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case

SPECIAL ASPECTS OF PRE‐INVESTIGATION CHECK AND INITIATION OF CRIMINAL CASE ON SEXUAL ASSAULT AGAINST MINORS

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Айгуль Халиуллина ◽  
Руслан Зайнуллин
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Assault ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Regulation Of Activity

The legal regulation of activity to verify reports of sexual assault against minors at the stage of initiation of criminal case is discussed. The authors pay particular attention on problem areas of realization of characteristic for this stage ways of preliminary verification.

INCRIMINATION AND THE MODIFICATION OF INCRIMINATION IN HEARING

2017 ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Arita Upīte ◽  
Ilona Bulgakova
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Full Understanding ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Court Hearing ◽  
The Way

The author of the research provides the explanation of the concept of criminal proceedings, its content, explores and analyzes the possibilities of amending the incrimination in court hearing process and its application in practice by studying and analyzing the legal literature, legal regulation and practice materials. Researching the Criminal Proceedings Law paragraphs 461 and 462 application in practice, the author has identified that public prosecutors, amending the incrimination in court hearing process, often indicate only the paragraph, without pointing the way the incrimination was amended, which does not allow to draw a conclusion if the way of incrimination amending has been understood correctly, as well as the incrimination amendment is used to clarify the incrimination and correct misspelling mistakes that have been made.The author of the research makes suggestions for improvement of mentioned regulations, because the incrimination must provide full understanding of its essence, without searching for additional explanations in criminal case materials.

scholarly journals Draft Law on Criminal Misconduct given the German Experience of Legal Regulation

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 133-141
Author(s):  
Ya. M. Ploshkina ◽  
L. V. Mayorova
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Minor

The paper considers the second attempt made by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in terms of introducing the concept of criminal misconduct into the Russian criminal and criminal procedure legislation, examines the goals of its introduction. The authors conclude that the introduction of a criminal offense in the draft law No. 1112019-7 will entail the need to review some approaches in Russian law: the legal nature of the crime, the ratio of a criminal offense with a minor act and an administrative offense, the elements of a crime with administrative prejudice, the principle of justice. It seems possible to achieve procedural effectiveness, reduce the burden on judges and protect the rights of victims without introducing a criminal offense within the existing criminal and criminal procedural mechanisms related to exemption from criminal liability and expansion of non-rehabilitating grounds for termination of a criminal case or criminal prosecution. It seems possible to use the already established categorization of crimes in relation to crimes of small and medium gravity. In terms of expanding the grounds for terminating a criminal case or criminal prosecution, it is appropriate to use the experience of the German legislator, which provides for the possibility of terminating criminal prosecution on grounds of expediency when the accused fulfills various duties and regulations assigned to him. In German criminal procedure law, the termination of criminal prosecution on grounds of expediency when assigning duties or prescriptions to the accused is the right of the relevant officials and bodies, and not their obligation, since in fact it is an alternative to criminal prosecution. This will allow it to be terminated at a certain stage in the case when there are all legal grounds for criminal prosecution.

scholarly journals To the admissibility of the civil law exemption of property from arrest, imposed in the criminal proceedings: domestic and foreign experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.

scholarly journals ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-165
Author(s):  
E.V. Christinina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Investigation Process

The scientific article is devoted to important issues related to the peculiarities of legal regulation of electronic media used as evidence in the investigation of a criminal case. The object of research of the scientific article is the law enforcement activity of the preliminary investigation bodies on the use of electronic evidence in the investigation of crimes. The article pays special attention to the purpose and production of individual investigative actions, during which electronic evidence is collected and evaluated. The subject of research in the scientific article is a set of norms established by the criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation and the opinions of procedural scientists regarding the use of electronic evidence in the investigation of crimes. The article analyzes the experience of foreign countries in the use of electronic evidence in the investigation process. The conclusion about the necessity and importance of using electronic evidence in a criminal case is summarized.

Pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case: the nature and methods of collecting evidence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Rossinskiy
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
Security Technologies ◽  
General Rules ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Evidence Collection ◽  
Trial Evidence

The monograph is devoted to a comprehensive review of the problems of pre-trial evidence collection as one of the stages of the general procedural mechanism aimed at establishing the circumstances relevant to the criminal case. The essence, methodological basis and system of investigative actions, forensic examinations and other procedural methods of collecting evidence that make up the modern arsenal of bodies of inquiry and preliminary investigation are investigated. The main cognitive and security technologies used in conducting investigative and other procedural actions are highlighted. The problems of the theory and legal regulation of the general rules of their implementation, the procedural status of their participants, fixing their progress and results, judicial control over their production are reflected; the actual problems of investigative inspection, examination, search, interrogation, confrontation, forensic examination, as well as the presentation, demand and seizure (seizure) of objects and documents are considered. Special attention is paid to the applied aspects, the analysis of errors and difficulties that arise in modern law enforcement practice, and possible ways to overcome them are proposed. For researchers and practitioners, teachers, postgraduates( adjuncts), students, as well as anyone interested in topical issues of criminal procedure law and criminology.

Suspicion and Charge Statuses in Criminal Remedial Activities

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Елена Сопнева ◽  
Elena Sopneva
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Theoretical Development ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Foreign Experience ◽  
Procedural Time ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

The author analyzes legislative, theoretical and practical levels of suspicion and charge enforcement. The author identifies problems of understanding the concepts of suspicion and charge: during theoretical and legislative classification of these categories the author identifies the absence of sound differences in their essence. The author considers foreign experience in realization of the suspicion and charge statuses in criminal remedial activities. The author comes to the conclusion that on the one hand, the suspicion, due to its procedural demand and importance has the right for independent theoretical development and independent legal regulation and on the other hand, it can be considered as an alternative to charge, since the latter cannot be considered to be the only possible basis for a transfer of a criminal case to a court. The author also accepts the variant when suspicion takes principal procedural time and the charge is defined at the end of criminal proceedings when the case is transferred to a court to be considered on the merits.

scholarly journals Legal Framework of the Mechanism for the Elimination of Judicial Errors in Germany: A Comparative Legal Aspect

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-132
Author(s):  
A. G. Trofimik
Keyword(s):  
Legal Aspect ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Judicial Errors ◽  
Assessment Of Evidence

The paper examines the legally enshrined principles of material truth (§ 244 II StPO) and free assessment of evidence (§ 261 StPO), as well as the doctrinal requirement for a comprehensive, complete and objective study of the circumstances of a criminal case from the standpoint of the legal mechanism for identifying and eliminating (eliminating) judicial errors in criminal proceedings in Germany. The meaning and functions of the named concepts for criminal proceedings have been determined. The influence of the principle of material truth (Untersuchungsgrundsatz, Aufklärungspflicht) and the principle of free evaluation of evidence on law enforcement are analyzed. Based on the analysis of the universal regulatory framework of the elimination of judicial errors and the corresponding judicial practice, comparing the current legal regulation of Germany with the Soviet criminal process, the author formulates hypotheses on the possibility of returning to the domestic criminal procedural law of truth as a special legal structure that guarantees the quality of the investigation of the circumstances of the criminal case and ensuring uniform judicial practice.

scholarly journals Discretionary Model of Legal Regulation of a Criminal Case and Criminal Prosecution Termination: Pro et Contra

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 214-222
Author(s):  
G. N. Kucherov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Enforcement Officer ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Law Enforcement Officer ◽  
The Law

The paper discusses the issues of choosing the most effective model of criminal proceedings termination, analyzes the proposed in the scientific literature model of refusal of the discretion of the law enforcement officer when making an appropriate procedural decision. The author, based on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, studies the relationship between the principle of justice and the legality of procedural decisions to terminate a criminal case and criminal prosecution. The author concludes that the discretionary model of legal regulation of a criminal case and criminal prosecution termination is an effective means of achieving the purpose of criminal proceedings, allowing the law enforcement officer to make a fair decision, given the nature, degree of social danger of the crime, the circumstances of its commission, information about the identity of the person who committed the crime. Refusal of the discretion of the law enforcement officer in the matter of terminating a criminal case will not only not contribute to the humanization of legislation, but will mark the victory of formalism over justice in criminal proceedings.

scholarly journals Ethic principles of using genetic information during criminal jurisdictional activity

2021 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 86-97
Author(s):  
O.I. Andreeva ◽  
◽  
O.A. Zaitsev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Information ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Private Life ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Expert Evidence ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Data Bases ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Genome Information

The article considers how the principles of respect for the honor and dignity of the individual and privacy are implemented in the use of genetic information in criminal proceedings. The authors analyzed existed tendencies, directed to increase the extent of federal basis of genetic information due to extension of the list of subjects, liable to compulsory genetic registration, legal regulation of mechanism of using genetic information during criminal trial. The authors concluded that indiscriminate extension of subjects, liable to compulsory genome records, covered by accused (suspected) persons in a committing of a crime, or deposing genome information of acquitted persons in data bases, or deposing genome information of persons, whose criminal cases were closed due to rehabilitative circumstances, do not meet requirements of the protection of their rights and legal interests. It is proven that the production of genetic expert evidence should be proceeded based on court judgment, secured with additional guarantees that this genetic information won’t be revealed out of the investigation of a concrete criminal case. The method of obtaining biometrical materials should include following actions: informing a person about the purpose and means of its obtaining, his/her rights, his/her duties, his/her responsibilities, access conditions to obtained materials, reindefication and restrictions of anonymity or privacy. The storage procedure of genetic information should guarantee the protection of the private life of a person; provide controlled access to it and to biometrical materials by authorities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document