scholarly journals Predictors of sickness absence related to musculoskeletal pain: a two-year follow-up study of workers in municipal kitchens

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eija Haukka ◽  
Leena Kaila-Kangas ◽  
Ritva Luukkonen ◽  
Esa-Pekka Takala ◽  
Eira Viikari-Juntura ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Sperotto ◽  
Sara Brachi ◽  
Fabio Vittadello ◽  
Francesco Zulian

Pain ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marja Mikkelsson ◽  
Jouko J Salminen ◽  
Andre Sourander ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen

Work & Stress ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiner Rugulies ◽  
Karl B. Christensen ◽  
Marianne Borritz ◽  
Ebbe Villadsen ◽  
Ute Bültmann ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurgita Narusyte ◽  
Emma Björkenstam ◽  
Kristina Alexanderson ◽  
Annina Ropponen ◽  
Linnea Kjeldgård ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
David Coggon ◽  
Georgia Ntani ◽  
Karen Walker-Bone ◽  
Vanda E Felli ◽  
Raul Harari ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo explore the association of sickness absence ascribed to pain at specific anatomical sites with wider propensity to musculoskeletal pain.MethodsAs part of the CUPID (Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability) study, potential risk factors for sickness absence from musculoskeletal pain were determined for 11 922 participants from 45 occupational groups in 18 countries. After approximately 14 months, 9119 (78%) provided follow-up information about sickness in the past month because of musculoskeletal pain, including 8610 who were still in the same job. Associations with absence for pain at specific anatomical sites were assessed by logistic regression and summarised by ORs with 95% CIs.Results861 participants (10%) reported absence from work because of musculoskeletal pain during the month before follow-up. After allowance for potential confounders, risk of absence ascribed entirely to low back pain (n=235) increased with the number of anatomical sites other than low back that had been reported as painful in the year before baseline (ORs 1.6 to 1.7 for ≥4 vs 0 painful sites). Similarly, associations with wider propensity to pain were observed for absence attributed entirely to pain in the neck (ORs up to 2.0) and shoulders (ORs up to 3.4).ConclusionsSickness absence for pain at specific anatomical sites is importantly associated with wider propensity to pain, the determinants of which extend beyond established risk factors such as somatising tendency and low mood. Better understanding of why some individuals are generally more prone to musculoskeletal pain might point to useful opportunities for prevention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
MEH Larsson ◽  
L. Nordeman ◽  
K. Holmgren ◽  
A. Grimby-Ekman ◽  
G. Hensing ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Musculoskeletal pain is globally a leading cause of physical disability. Many musculoskeletal-related pain conditions, such as low back pain, often resolve spontaneously. In some individuals, pain may recur or persist, leading to ong-term physical disability, reduced work capacity, and sickness absence. Early identification of individuals in which this may occur, is essential for preventing or reducing the risk of developing persistent musculoskeletal pain and long-term sickness absence. The aim of the trial described in this protocol is to evaluate effects of an early intervention, the PREVSAM model, on the prevention of sickness absence and development of persistent pain in at-risk patients with musculoskeletal pain. Methods Eligible participants are adults who seek health care for musculoskeletal pain and who are at risk of developing persistent pain, physical disability, and sickness absence. Participants may be recruited from primary care rehabilitation centres or primary care healthcare centres in Region Västra Götaland. Participants will be randomised to treatment according to the PREVSAM model (intervention group) or treatment as usual (control group). The PREVSAM model comprises an interdisciplinary, person-centred rehabilitation programme, including coordinated measures within primary health care, and may include collaboration with participants’ employers. The primary outcome sickness absence is operationalised as the number and proportion of individuals who remain in full- or part-time work, the number of gross and net days of sickness absence during the intervention and follow-up period, and time to first sickness absence spell. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported short-term sickness absence, work ability, pain, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, risk for sickness absence, anxiety and depression symptoms and physical disability at 1 and 3 months after inclusion (short-term follow-up), and at 6 and 12 months (long-term follow-up). A cost-effectiveness analysis is planned and drug consumption will be investigated. Discussion The study is expected to provide new knowledge on the effectiveness of a comprehensive rehabilitation model that incorporates early identification of patients with musculoskeletal pain at risk for development of sickness absence and persistent pain. The study findings may contribute to more effective rehabilitation processes of this large patient population, and potentially reduce sickness absence and costs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03913325, Registered April 12, 2019. Version 2, 10 July 2020. Version 2 changes: Clarifications regarding trial aim and inclusion process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 883-894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Ohta ◽  
Yoshiyuki Higuchi ◽  
Masaharu Kumashiro ◽  
Hiroshi Yamato ◽  
Hisamichi Sugimura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document