scholarly journals PERCEPTION OF POSTGRADUATE FAMILY MEDICINE TRAINEES ABOUT THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE) ASSESSMENT METHOD

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Ihsan Ullah
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Previous Experience ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
P Value ◽  
Real Patient ◽  
Practical Examination ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Assessment drives learning and improving the quality of assessment has a remarkable impact on the quality of learning. Objective Structured Clinical Examination is termed more reliable and valid as compared to conventional practical examination. Objective: The objective of this study was to find the perception of postgraduate family medicine trainees about the OSCE assessment method and compare those having previous experience with those having no previous experience. Methodology: This was a cross-section study conducted at the end of exit examination of diploma in family medicine at the Family Medicine Department, Khyber Medical University Peshawar. Data were collected on an eleven items questionnaire on a five-point Likert Scale. Study participants were categorized based on their previous experience of the OSCE, and were grouped into two categories. Data were analyzed by using Fisher’s Exact test and a p-value of ? 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 56 out of 60 candidates returned completed questionnaires. The response rate was 93.33% where the majority were males 52(92.9%). Participants with experience of the OSCE were 22 (39.3%) while 34 (60.7%) were having no experience of the assessment method. There was a significant difference (p= 0.001) in the perception about the OSCE with the simulated patient than real patient, fairness and reliability of the OSCE, stress and length of the OSCE and reduction of bias in the OSCE. The perception about weightage to be given to the OSCE in any examination was significantly different (p=0.004) between the two groups. Conclusion: Participants of both groups (experienced vs non-experienced) agreed on some aspects of the OSCE. Their opinion differed about the fairness, validity and stress related to the OSCE assessment method. This difference is probably explained by the inadequacy of an experience to form an opinion. Keywords: Conventional practical examination, Family medicine, OSCE.    

scholarly journals An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for French Dental Students: Feedback after 2 Years

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Claire Egloff-Juras ◽  
Pierre Hirtz ◽  
Amandine Luc ◽  
Anne-Sophie Vaillant-Corroy
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
P Value ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Practical Examination ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Global Mean

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a practical examination that provides a standardized assessment of clinical competence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the objectivity and the reliability of an OSCE in dentistry. To this end, a retrospective monocentric observational study was conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry of Nancy by analyzing the exam results of 81 students. The study population consisted of the fifth-year students. The examination was broken down into six stations which were doubled, and different juries of examiners were constituted (installed in different rooms) according to the same composition. The p-value was set at 0.05. We found an equivalence of the results between the different rooms on the global mean score obtained at the six stations (p = 0.021). In terms of gender, women have statistically significantly higher overall scores than men (p = 0.001). The evaluation of a difference in the scores between full-time and part-time teachers does not find any statistically significant difference or equivalence in the station where it was possible to realize the comparison. However, the students’ waiting time before the exam seems to negatively influence the results. Compared with other international OSCE studies, the results presented seemed sufficiently objective and reliable, although some adjustments are still necessary.

PERAN WARGA PEDULI AIDS CAHAYA CARE TUREN DALAM MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS HIDUP ODHA

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Nurhudi Sasono
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Antiretroviral Drugs ◽  
P Value ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Development Goals ◽  
Living With Hiv ◽  
Hiv Aids

Abstract : Indicator of the health welfare through Sustanable Development Goals (SDGs) is to reduce the incidence of HIV-AIDS, decrease the rate of the epidemic and maintain the quality of life of people living with HIV-AIDS (PLWHA). Trend cases of HIV-AIDS is the most recent spread among people, especially housewives. In Malang until 2015 found 278 Housewife of 409 cases of AIDS. The prevalence of HIV-AIDS in Malang Regency is ranked second after Surabaya city in East Java. For the importance of public participation and citizen care AIDS Cahaya Care Turen take responsibility for the condition. Determination Rule Goverment number 2 2015 year on the Participation of the community response to HIV-AIDS in Malang as a legal rule. Concerned Citizens activities AIDS (WPA). WPA Cahaya Care Turen is increases HIV risk and quality of life PLWHA. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of Citizens AIDS Cahaya Care Quality of Care Turen against people living with HIV in Puskesmas Turen Malang. The study design using a quasi-experimental, with purposive sampling using a sampling technique. Total number of research subjects 23. Based on test results obtained with the Wilcoxon p value <0.005, which means that there is a significant difference before and after PLWHA joining participated in the WPA Cahaya Care Turen. The conclusion of this study is WPA activities involving people living with HIV and at risk groups can optimize compliance with antiretroviral drugs that have an impact on improving the quality of life of PLHIV. Suggestions in this research is done WPA Program activities are structured and ongoing cross-sector in order to improve the quality of life and empower PLWHA.Keywords : WPA Cahaya Care Turen, Quality of life, PLWHA Abstrak : Salah satu indikator kesejahteraan kesehatan melalui Sustanable Development Goals (SDGs) adalah menekan angka kejadian HIV-AIDS, menurunkan laju epidemik dan mempertahankan kualitas hidup Orang dengan HIV-AIDS (ODHA). Trend kasus HIV-AIDS terkini terbanyak adalah menjangkit dikalangan masyarakat khususnya pada ibu rumah tangga. Kabupaten Malang sampai dengan tahun 2015 ditemukan 278 Ibu Rumah Tangga dari 409 kasus AIDS. Prevalensi HIV-AIDS di Kabupaten Malang ini merupakan peringkat kedua di Jawa Timur setelah Kota Surabaya. Untuk itu pentingnya peran serta masyarakat dan warga peduli AIDS Cahaya Care Turen ikut bertanggung jawab terhadap kondisi tersebut. Penetapan Peraturan Bupati Malang no.2 th.2015 tentang Peran serta masyarakat penanggulangan HIV-AIDS di Kabupaten Malang diharapkan dapat mengurangi risiko penularan HIV dan meningkatkan kualitas hidup ODHA. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Peran Warga Peduli AIDS Cahaya Care Turen terhadap Kualitas ODHA Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Turen Kabupaten Malang. Desain penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen, dengan teknik sampling menggunakan purposive sampling. Jumlah subyek penelitian sejumlah 23. Berdasarkan hasil uji dengan Wilcoxon didapatkan nilai p value < 0.005 yang berarti bahwa terdapat perbedaan bermakna sebelum dan sesudah ODHA bergabung mengikuti kegiatan WPA Cahaya Care Turen. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini adalah kegiatan WPA dengan melibatkan ODHA dan kelompok beresiko dapat mengoptimalkan kepatuhan obat ART sehingga berdampak terhadap peningkatan kualitas hidup ODHA. Saran dalam penelitian ini adalah dilakukannya Program kegiatan WPA yang terstruktur dan berkesinambungan lintas sektor guna meningkatkan kualitas hidup dan memberdayakan ODHA.     Kata kunci : WPA Cahaya Care Turen, kualitas hidup, ODHA

Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common cause of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease in comparison with other bariatric operations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
majdi abu sneineh ◽  
malek abu sneineh ◽  
Monther Abu Sneineh ◽  
mustafa abu sneineh ◽  
muneer abu snineh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Bariatric Procedure ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Symptomatic Gerd ◽  
Swallow Study ◽  
Contrast Swallow ◽  
Gerd Symptoms

Abstract Introduction GERD is one of the complications of bariatric operations that might affect the quality of life. We aim to perform a retrospective cohort study to determine the incidence of symptomatic GERD following different types of bariatric surgery and which operations are considered a contraindication of GERD. Besides, we are attempting to identify the risk factors of GERD after bariatric surgery. Methods Medical records of 729 patients undergone bariatric operations between January 2010 and June 2019 at Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center were reviewed. Results There was a significant difference between the type of bariatric procedure and the incidence of GERD symptoms after the operation. The incidence of symptomatic GERD in patients who underwent SG was 39.9% (p =0.0131). This was significantly higher compared to 16.4% following roux en y gastric bypass, 23.4% following LAGB, and 11% following OAGB. 113 patients out of 718 had a positive swallow test and of these patient 71 developed GERD symptoms post-operatively without correlation to the degree of reflux at the swallow test but with statistically significant correlation to the type of operation especially for SG (P-value <0.001) and to our knowledge this was never reported in the literature. Conclusion SG is a good bariatric procedure option but should be contraindicated in asymptomatic reflux contrast swallow study and symptomatic GERD patients preoperatively because of high levels of symptomatic GERD post-operatively. Asymptomatic reflux at contrast swallow study pre-operatively should be considered a risk factor for GERD after the operation.

Objective Structured Clinical Examination: An Assessment Method for Academic-Practice Partnerships

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 8-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Raurell-Torredà ◽  
Àngel Romero-Collado ◽  
Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs ◽  
Josep Olivet-Pujol ◽  
Alícia Baltasar-Bagué ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Academic Practice

Do-It-Yourself Microsuture from Human Hair for Basic Microsurgical Training

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (05) ◽  
pp. 315-321
Author(s):  
Pobe Luangjarmekorn ◽  
Pravit Kitidumrongsook ◽  
Sittisak Honsawek
Keyword(s):  
Human Hair ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Smooth Curve ◽  
P Value ◽  
Excellent Quality ◽  
Likert Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Do It Yourself ◽  
Knot Security

Background Microsuture is an essential material for basic microsurgical training. However, it is consumable, expensive, and sometimes unavailable in the microsurgical laboratory. To solve this problem, we developed a microsuture made from human hair and needle gauge. Methods Do-It-Yourself (DIY) microsuture is made from human hair and needle gauge 32G (BD Ultra-Fine Pen Needles 4 mm × 32G). Methods are explained step by step. This DIY microsuture (labeled as “test microsuture”) and nylon 8–0 (Ethilon suture 8–0, labeled as “standard microsuture”) were used for teaching orthopaedic residents to perform arterial anastomosis in chicken thighs. All residents practiced without knowing that “test microsuture” was made from the DIY method. After completing the training, quality of both microsutures was evaluated by questionnaire in topics of (1) thread quality (size, strength, elasticity, handing, knot perform, and knot security), (2) needle quality (size, curve, shape, sharpness, handling, and strength), (3) needle–thread interface (size, strength, and smoothness), and (4) overall quality of microsuture. Each category was evaluated by Likert score (5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = fair, 2 = poor, and 1 = very poor). Results The DIY microsuture was performed in three steps: (1) insert human hair into needle gauge by microforceps, (2) bend needle into smooth curve, and (3) disconnect needle and create needle–hair interface. The questionnaire was completed by 30 orthopaedic residents and showed that thread quality of DIY and standard microsuture had “good” and “good-to-excellent” quality (mean Likert score: 3.77–4.23 and 3.80–4.27, respectively, with no statistical difference). Thread–needle interface quality of DIY and standard microsuture also had “good” and “good-to-excellent” quality (Likert score: 3.73–4.20 and 4.07–4.33, respectively, with no statistical difference). Needle part of DIY microsuture had lower quality than standard suture (fair-to-good compared with good-to-excellence quality, score 3.30–3.67 vs. 4.20–4.27, respectively, with a statistically significant difference, p-value < 0.05). However, overall quality of DIY suture and standard microsuture had “good” and “good-to-excellent” (mean Likert score: 3.73 and 4.00, respectively, with no statistical difference). Conclusion The DIY microsuture from human hair and needle gauge could be an alternative for basic microsurgical training with lower cost, easy production, and more availability for use in practice with acceptable quality compared with that of standard microsuture.

scholarly journals Traditional Versus Objective Structured Clinical Examination on Pediatric Nursing Students’ Performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Khadiga M. Said ◽  
Safaa F. Draz
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Simple Random Sample ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pediatric Nursing ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nursing Skills

Context: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) method is an effective tool for evaluating the clinical nursing skills of nursing students. OSCE is an assessment technique in which the student demonstrates their competence under a variety of simulated conditions Aim: This study aimed to compare objective structured clinical examinations versus traditional clinical examination on pediatric nursing students' performance. Methods: A quasi-experimental research design (study and control group) was used to conduct this study. The study was conducted in the laboratory of pediatric nursing skills at the faculty of nursing, Benha University. All male and female pediatric nursing students in the 3rd year (n. =228), who were studying in the academic year 2018-2019, first semester, faculty of nursing, Benha University, was recruited. A simple random sample chose to achieve the aim of this study. The odd number was for the OSCE group and the even number for the traditional clinical examination (TCE) group. Four tools were utilized to collect data for the current study. A Structured Questionnaire Sheet, A modified Self-administered Questionnaire, Pediatric Nursing Students' Practice Observational Checklists, and Clinical Scenarios were designed to assess the pediatric nursing student OSCE exam and compare between the traditional method and OSCE method of exams. Results: The current study discovered statistically significant differences were found with a high percentage of agreement responses among pediatric nursing students for related items of OSCE method compared to those in TCE. Additionally, the results clarify a highly statistically significant difference between the studied pediatric nursing students' in TCE and OSCE total performance scores. Conclusion: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was opinioned as a tool for clinical evaluation. This finding appeared in pediatric nursing students' responses, which confirmed their acceptance of OSCE. The OSCE subsequently remains a more objective method of assessment than the traditional clinical forms of the exam that was previously used. OSCE can be used most effectively in undergraduate nursing curricula to assess fair practice. This type of exam provided an accurate measure of clinical skill competencies. Therefore, OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years. The current study recommended that Objective Structured Clinical Examination can be used as effective and meaningful assistance to fitness for practice, and OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years.

Morbidity and quality of life in patients with vulvar cancer after inguinal sentinel lymphadenectomy compared to radical inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabinshy Thangarajah ◽  
Kristina Rogeé ◽  
Caroline Pahmeyer ◽  
Kathrin Kuhr ◽  
Matthias Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Vulvar Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
P Value ◽  
Sentinel Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Inguinofemoral Lymphadenectomy

Abstract Aim Probability of survival of patients with vulvar cancer directly depends on the lymph node status. Surgery of lymph nodes can be performed as radical inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy or in cases with certain conditions as sentinel lymph node surgery. The aim of this study is to obtain an overview of the intervention-related morbidity and quality of life in patients with vulvar carcinoma after lymphadenectomy. Methods Quality of life and morbidity was compared between patients who underwent radical inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy with those who underwent sentinel lymph node surgery. Results All recorded postoperative complications occur more frequently in the non-sentinel group, Significant difference was shown for the occurrence of lymphedema (p-value = 0.024) and sensitivity loss (p-value = 0.024). Recurrence of disease was more frequent in the non-sentinel group (38 % vs. 20 %, p = 0.621, n.s.) and satisfaction with groin surgery is slightly higher in the sentinel group (94 % vs. 89 %, p = 1.000, n.s.). Conclusion We could demonstrate a significantly lower morbidity of sentinel lymphadenectomy compared to conventional inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy while maintaining the same oncological safety. The low morbidity of sentinel- lymphadenectomy does not seem to influence the postoperative quality of life significantly. However, recording of the individual burden of lymphadenectomy by questionnaires should be optimized.

A study of Madrid sonographicenthesis score Index (MASEI) versus spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada (SPARCC) in the assessment of early enthesopathy among psoriatic skin patient

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nehal M Zytoon ◽  
Nadia S Abd El Bar ◽  
Mona G El Husseiny ◽  
Reem M El-mallah ◽  
Nermin H El-Gharbawy
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound ◽  
Psoriatic Skin ◽  
P Value ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Research Consortium ◽  
Score Index

Abstract Objective To compare between Sonographic Madrid score index (MASEI) versus Spondyloarthritis research consortium of canada (SPARCC) for early assessment of enthesopathy among psoriatic skin patients. Patients and Methods This study included fifty psoriatic skin patients. All underwent history, laboratory investigation, clinical examination using SPARCC score, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and musculoskeletal ultrasound using MASEI score with power Doppler (PD) bilaterally for assessment of enthesitis. Results The mean age of fifty patients was 42.00 ± 10.923 years, disease duration of 11.110 ±7.402 and BMI of 29.356 ± 3.753. The mean PASI was 12.950±8.044. SPARCC score was positive in 10 out of 50 patients (20%).MASEI score was positive in 20 out of 50 patients (40%) with 10 out of 50 patients had power Doppler signals. Highly statistically significant difference between MASEI and SPARCC score( pvalue &lt;0.001). Highly statistically significant positive correlation was observed between PASI score and MASEI(r = 0.498, p-value &lt;0.001). Conclusion musculoskeletal ultrasound is useful for early detection of enthesitis and to be a sensitive tool in detecting of enthesitis and subclinical enthesitis that can be missed during routine clinical examination.

scholarly journals Quality of Life in Children with Asthma versus Healthy Children

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 1413-1418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samaneh Kouzegaran ◽  
Parisa Samimi ◽  
Hamid Ahanchian ◽  
Maryam Khoshkhui ◽  
Fatemeh Behmanesh
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Children With Asthma ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Asthma Group

BACKGROUND: Asthma is the most prevalent chronic disease in the pediatric age group. The disease affects different aspects of the children's lives, such as physical, emotional, social and educational aspects. Thus, more focus has been on the quality of life in these patients rather than the duration of their illness in recent years.AIM: This study examined the different aspects of quality of life in asthmatic children for the first time in this geographic area.METHODS: The study was cross-sectional conducted in 2015-2016. The asthmatic group was 100 patients aged 8 to 12 admitted to the Asthma and Allergy Clinic of Ghaem Hospital (as) in Mashhad with the control group composed of 100 healthy children of the same age and gender. The standard questionnaire pedsQLTM was used for comparing the quality of life of children in the two groups. Statistical analysis was SPSS23 with P-value less than 0.05, which was statistically significant.RESULTS: In each group, 58 patients were boys, and 42 were girls. In a comparison of the quality of life of children, the asthma group with a mean total score of Peds QL 20.99 ± 12.54 compared to the healthy children with a mean total score of Peds QL of 8.8 ± 5.41 had a lower quality of life (P < 0.001). Moreover, regarding various aspects of quality of life asthma group had a lower quality of life in physical performance, emotional performance and performance in school (P < 0.001). Nonetheless, there was no significant difference between the two groups considering social function (P = 0.267). Examining the relationship between Peds QL score of patients with asthma with various variables was indicative of the fact that Peds QL scores were significantly correlated with the gender of the patients, showing better quality of life in the girls (P = 0.001).CONCLUSION: The results indicated that children with asthma have a significantly lower quality of life compared with healthy children of the same age. Also, in examining the different aspects of quality of life, these children had a lower quality of life in physical performance, emotional performance, and performance at school, and were at the level as that of healthy children only in social performance.

scholarly journals The effect of a stress and anxiety coping program on objective structured clinical examination performance among nursing students in shiraz, Iran

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadaf Mojarrab ◽  
Leila Bazrafkan ◽  
Azita Jaberi
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Relaxation Training ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Demographic Characteristics ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Exam Anxiety

Abstract Background Evaluation of the competence and practical skills of nursing students, using the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), is an integral part of the nursing education program. However, their performance could be negatively influenced by a significant level of stress and anxiety prior to the test. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of an anxiety coping program on the OSCE performance level of first-year nursing students in Shiraz, Iran. Methods The present quasi-experimental study was conducted among 76 nursing students; control group (n = 35) and intervention group (n = 41). To attain the study purpose, the intervention group received a pre-exam anxiety coping program that included relaxation and soothing techniques, diaphragmatic breathing training, and progressive muscle relaxation training accompanied by light instrumental music, while the control group received no intervention before the exam. Data collection instruments included a demographic characteristics form and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. Demographic characteristics of the participants indicated an overall homogeneity within the study population. The STAI questionnaire was filled in before and after the OSCE and the results were compared with those of the control group. The data were analysed using SPSS software (version 22.0). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results As a result of the anxiety coping program, a substantial reduction in the anxiety score (by 11.61 units) in the intervention group was observed. There was a significant difference in the pre- and post-exam anxiety scores between the control and intervention groups (P < 0.001). The anxiety coping program improved the examination results of nursing students in the final exam compared to the midterm results (an increase of 0.9487 units, P < 0.001). Conclusion The anxiety coping program reduced the anxiety level among nursing students and improved their OSCE results. Our findings can be utilized to better evaluate clinical activities in different medical and paramedical groups. Moreover, educators can implement such coping programs prior to evaluations in order to effectively assess the knowledge, attitude, and performance of the students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document