scholarly journals An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for French Dental Students: Feedback after 2 Years

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Claire Egloff-Juras ◽  
Pierre Hirtz ◽  
Amandine Luc ◽  
Anne-Sophie Vaillant-Corroy
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
P Value ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Practical Examination ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Part Time ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Global Mean

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a practical examination that provides a standardized assessment of clinical competence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the objectivity and the reliability of an OSCE in dentistry. To this end, a retrospective monocentric observational study was conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry of Nancy by analyzing the exam results of 81 students. The study population consisted of the fifth-year students. The examination was broken down into six stations which were doubled, and different juries of examiners were constituted (installed in different rooms) according to the same composition. The p-value was set at 0.05. We found an equivalence of the results between the different rooms on the global mean score obtained at the six stations (p = 0.021). In terms of gender, women have statistically significantly higher overall scores than men (p = 0.001). The evaluation of a difference in the scores between full-time and part-time teachers does not find any statistically significant difference or equivalence in the station where it was possible to realize the comparison. However, the students’ waiting time before the exam seems to negatively influence the results. Compared with other international OSCE studies, the results presented seemed sufficiently objective and reliable, although some adjustments are still necessary.

scholarly journals PERCEPTION OF POSTGRADUATE FAMILY MEDICINE TRAINEES ABOUT THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE) ASSESSMENT METHOD

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Ihsan Ullah
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Previous Experience ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
P Value ◽  
Real Patient ◽  
Practical Examination ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Assessment drives learning and improving the quality of assessment has a remarkable impact on the quality of learning. Objective Structured Clinical Examination is termed more reliable and valid as compared to conventional practical examination. Objective: The objective of this study was to find the perception of postgraduate family medicine trainees about the OSCE assessment method and compare those having previous experience with those having no previous experience. Methodology: This was a cross-section study conducted at the end of exit examination of diploma in family medicine at the Family Medicine Department, Khyber Medical University Peshawar. Data were collected on an eleven items questionnaire on a five-point Likert Scale. Study participants were categorized based on their previous experience of the OSCE, and were grouped into two categories. Data were analyzed by using Fisher’s Exact test and a p-value of ? 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 56 out of 60 candidates returned completed questionnaires. The response rate was 93.33% where the majority were males 52(92.9%). Participants with experience of the OSCE were 22 (39.3%) while 34 (60.7%) were having no experience of the assessment method. There was a significant difference (p= 0.001) in the perception about the OSCE with the simulated patient than real patient, fairness and reliability of the OSCE, stress and length of the OSCE and reduction of bias in the OSCE. The perception about weightage to be given to the OSCE in any examination was significantly different (p=0.004) between the two groups. Conclusion: Participants of both groups (experienced vs non-experienced) agreed on some aspects of the OSCE. Their opinion differed about the fairness, validity and stress related to the OSCE assessment method. This difference is probably explained by the inadequacy of an experience to form an opinion. Keywords: Conventional practical examination, Family medicine, OSCE.    

scholarly journals Traditional Versus Objective Structured Clinical Examination on Pediatric Nursing Students’ Performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Khadiga M. Said ◽  
Safaa F. Draz
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Simple Random Sample ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pediatric Nursing ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nursing Skills

Context: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) method is an effective tool for evaluating the clinical nursing skills of nursing students. OSCE is an assessment technique in which the student demonstrates their competence under a variety of simulated conditions Aim: This study aimed to compare objective structured clinical examinations versus traditional clinical examination on pediatric nursing students' performance. Methods: A quasi-experimental research design (study and control group) was used to conduct this study. The study was conducted in the laboratory of pediatric nursing skills at the faculty of nursing, Benha University. All male and female pediatric nursing students in the 3rd year (n. =228), who were studying in the academic year 2018-2019, first semester, faculty of nursing, Benha University, was recruited. A simple random sample chose to achieve the aim of this study. The odd number was for the OSCE group and the even number for the traditional clinical examination (TCE) group. Four tools were utilized to collect data for the current study. A Structured Questionnaire Sheet, A modified Self-administered Questionnaire, Pediatric Nursing Students' Practice Observational Checklists, and Clinical Scenarios were designed to assess the pediatric nursing student OSCE exam and compare between the traditional method and OSCE method of exams. Results: The current study discovered statistically significant differences were found with a high percentage of agreement responses among pediatric nursing students for related items of OSCE method compared to those in TCE. Additionally, the results clarify a highly statistically significant difference between the studied pediatric nursing students' in TCE and OSCE total performance scores. Conclusion: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was opinioned as a tool for clinical evaluation. This finding appeared in pediatric nursing students' responses, which confirmed their acceptance of OSCE. The OSCE subsequently remains a more objective method of assessment than the traditional clinical forms of the exam that was previously used. OSCE can be used most effectively in undergraduate nursing curricula to assess fair practice. This type of exam provided an accurate measure of clinical skill competencies. Therefore, OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years. The current study recommended that Objective Structured Clinical Examination can be used as effective and meaningful assistance to fitness for practice, and OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years.

A study of Madrid sonographicenthesis score Index (MASEI) versus spondyloarthritis research consortium of Canada (SPARCC) in the assessment of early enthesopathy among psoriatic skin patient

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nehal M Zytoon ◽  
Nadia S Abd El Bar ◽  
Mona G El Husseiny ◽  
Reem M El-mallah ◽  
Nermin H El-Gharbawy
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound ◽  
Psoriatic Skin ◽  
P Value ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Research Consortium ◽  
Score Index

Abstract Objective To compare between Sonographic Madrid score index (MASEI) versus Spondyloarthritis research consortium of canada (SPARCC) for early assessment of enthesopathy among psoriatic skin patients. Patients and Methods This study included fifty psoriatic skin patients. All underwent history, laboratory investigation, clinical examination using SPARCC score, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and musculoskeletal ultrasound using MASEI score with power Doppler (PD) bilaterally for assessment of enthesitis. Results The mean age of fifty patients was 42.00 ± 10.923 years, disease duration of 11.110 ±7.402 and BMI of 29.356 ± 3.753. The mean PASI was 12.950±8.044. SPARCC score was positive in 10 out of 50 patients (20%).MASEI score was positive in 20 out of 50 patients (40%) with 10 out of 50 patients had power Doppler signals. Highly statistically significant difference between MASEI and SPARCC score( pvalue <0.001). Highly statistically significant positive correlation was observed between PASI score and MASEI(r = 0.498, p-value <0.001). Conclusion musculoskeletal ultrasound is useful for early detection of enthesitis and to be a sensitive tool in detecting of enthesitis and subclinical enthesitis that can be missed during routine clinical examination.

scholarly journals Population-based survey of HIV sero-status and vertical transmission among naive pregnant women in Sokoto, Nigeria

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiekumo Igbida Buseri ◽  
Charity Ngozi Okonkwo
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vertical Transmission ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
P Value ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: This study aims at investigating the seroprevalence of HIV infection among status naive pregnant women and probable vertical transmission in Sokoto, Nigeria.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study examined 13,026 apparently healthy pregnant women aged between 14 and 45 years and 312 mother-baby pairs in 4 different hospital settings in Sokoto State, North West, Nigeria between March, 2011 and February, 2013. The babies were aged between 8 and 16 months. HIV screening was performed using qualitative rapid tests and ELISA and HIV-DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Measurement of CD4+ T-lymphocytes was carried out by the BD FACScount System. All seropositive pregnant women were immediately placed on triple antiretroviral therapy (ART) throughout the duration of the pregnancy and beyond.Results: An overall 2.4% prevalence of HIV-1 infection among the pregnant women and 20.5% incident of mother-to-child transmission were found. Of the seropositive pregnant women, 75.0% were full-time house wives, 13.8% and 11.2% were traders and civil servants respectively; of which, 70.2% were within the ages of 14 and 27 years (youthful predominance). Pearson’s χ2analysis did not show any statistically significant difference in the Mean values in the 4 health facilities (χ2 =2.084, df=3, P-value=0.555). Similarly, no significant difference in HIV seropositivity in the demographic data of the pregnant women were observed (P>0.05). Infection was recorded in all age groups but there was no statistical significance between age groups and infection (P = 0.833). Of the 64 seropositive babies, 62 (92.5%) contracted HIV from antiretroviral therapy non-adherence mothers (χ2 =271.457, df=1, P<0.01), OR=1506.6 (95%CI=285.5-7950.4). Conclusion: This study found high prevalence of vertical transmission due to ART non-adherence. Intervention initiatives should, therefore, focus seriously on ART non-adherence. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v6i3.11530Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.6(3) 2015 49-57  

scholarly journals The effect of a stress and anxiety coping program on objective structured clinical examination performance among nursing students in shiraz, Iran

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadaf Mojarrab ◽  
Leila Bazrafkan ◽  
Azita Jaberi
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Relaxation Training ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Demographic Characteristics ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Exam Anxiety

Abstract Background Evaluation of the competence and practical skills of nursing students, using the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), is an integral part of the nursing education program. However, their performance could be negatively influenced by a significant level of stress and anxiety prior to the test. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of an anxiety coping program on the OSCE performance level of first-year nursing students in Shiraz, Iran. Methods The present quasi-experimental study was conducted among 76 nursing students; control group (n = 35) and intervention group (n = 41). To attain the study purpose, the intervention group received a pre-exam anxiety coping program that included relaxation and soothing techniques, diaphragmatic breathing training, and progressive muscle relaxation training accompanied by light instrumental music, while the control group received no intervention before the exam. Data collection instruments included a demographic characteristics form and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire. Demographic characteristics of the participants indicated an overall homogeneity within the study population. The STAI questionnaire was filled in before and after the OSCE and the results were compared with those of the control group. The data were analysed using SPSS software (version 22.0). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results As a result of the anxiety coping program, a substantial reduction in the anxiety score (by 11.61 units) in the intervention group was observed. There was a significant difference in the pre- and post-exam anxiety scores between the control and intervention groups (P < 0.001). The anxiety coping program improved the examination results of nursing students in the final exam compared to the midterm results (an increase of 0.9487 units, P < 0.001). Conclusion The anxiety coping program reduced the anxiety level among nursing students and improved their OSCE results. Our findings can be utilized to better evaluate clinical activities in different medical and paramedical groups. Moreover, educators can implement such coping programs prior to evaluations in order to effectively assess the knowledge, attitude, and performance of the students.

scholarly journals Effects of healthcare policy and education on reading accuracy of bitewing radiographs for interproximal caries

2020 ◽  
pp. 20200153
Author(s):  
Hiroki Sato ◽  
John D Da Silva ◽  
Cliff Lee ◽  
Hisashi Yonemoto ◽  
Yukinori Kuwajima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Core Curriculum ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Healthcare Policy ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Enamel Caries ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Usa ◽  
General Dentists ◽  
Japanese Group

Objectives The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of bitewing radiograph interpretation of predoctoral students, residents and general dentists who work under different core curriculum of dental education and healthcare policy. Methods A total of 118 examiners including predoctoral dental students, residents and general dentists from USA and Japan were tasked with evaluating a series of bitewing radiographs and diagnosing interproximal carious lesions. This study was approved by the Harvard Medical School Institutional Review Board (IRB). Participants graded interproximal aspects of those images and categorized the following criteria; “intact”, “enamel caries <1/2 width”, “enamel caries >1/2 width” or “caries into dentin”. The gold-standard was determined by the consensus of two HSDM full-time faculty. Results There was significant difference in the sensitivity for all three caries levels between the two groups but there was no significant difference on specificity. The positive-predictive and negative-predictive values of the USA group for the enamel caries (<1/2 of enamel) were significantly higher than the Japanese group. The average of AUC (ROC) was significantly higher in the USA group (0.885 ± 0.04) than the Japanese group (0.785 ± 0.08, p<0.01). Conclusion Teaching and adopting BW radiographs for diagnosis of interproximal caries is integral for dental providers to accurately and efficiently use them in their practices. It is critical that all dental educators approach policymakers to explain the importance of BW radiographs and promote their efficacy for prevention and early diagnosis of interproximal caries.

scholarly journals Iranian Dental Students and Specialists Knowledge and Attitude about Obstructive Sleep Apnea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shervin Shafiei ◽  
Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi ◽  
Mohammad Behnaz ◽  
Hannaneh Safiaghdam ◽  
Soroush Sadr
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
P Value ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral Medicine ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Knowledge And Attitude

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea is a relatively common sleep disorder, which leads to multiple sleep arousal and hypoxemia. It also has a significant socioeconomic impact. Dentists can have a role in screening as well as treating apnea by orthodontic devices. No study has evaluated the knowledge and attitude of dental health professionals about obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Iran. We aimed to measure knowledge and attitude among students and faculty members of Shahid Beheshti Dental School, Tehran, Iran about OSA. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among residents and professors in oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, and oral medicine specialties and dental students. The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitude (OSAKA) questionnaire was used to obtain the information regarding knowledge and attitude. We used Chi-square, Kruskall Wallis, Mann-Whitney U test for statistical analysis. The data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 and a p-value lower than 0.05 considered to be significant. Results: One hundred ninety-seven participants, including 43 dental students, 68 dental residents, and 64 dental professors filled the survey. Mean knowledge score among all participants was 10.69 (SD=3.133). Overall, oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery professors had significantly higher correct answer ratios in the knowledge section than fifth and sixth-year dental students (p<0.001). There was no significant difference among other groups (p>0.05). About attitude, 91% of respondents reported that OSA is an important or extremely important disorder. However, only 10.2% and 16.9% felt confident about the ability to manage patients with OSA and identifying patients at risk for OSA, respectively. Conclusion: All of the participants had poor knowledge but a positive attitude towards OSA. This shows the necessity of better education about OSA.

scholarly journals Knowledge and Self-Perceived Confidence Level in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery among Dental Interns in Riyadh

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alhanouf Alhulayyil ◽  
Lujain Alsaleh ◽  
Saba Alshareef ◽  
Lubna Elsayed ◽  
Mamata Hebbal
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Confidence Level ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Dental Schools

Introduction: Minor oral surgical procedures are practiced in dental teaching. Interns are required to be competent, well-prepared and acknowledge its basics before their practice. Lack of training and knowledge could lead to serious consequences during clinical practice. Aim: To assess the knowledge and confidence level between male and female dental interns in private and governmental Riyadh dental schools in performing simple dento-alveolar procedures. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in January 2020 among dental interns from all Riyadh dental schools. A cross-sectional survey containing 23 items was used. The first part included the informed consent and demographic data (item 1-3). The second part consisted of 10 case scenarios to assess the knowledge level (item 4-13), and the third part was developed to self-rate their confidence level (item 14-23). Around 300 participants belonging to five Riyadh dental schools comprised the study population. All interns were included in the study after obtaining informed consent. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 and Microsoft Excel 16.16. Groups were compared using Pearson chi-square and unpaired sample t-test. The p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 300 interns invited to participate, 210 submitted the electronic survey (70%). The final study population included 117 (56%) females and 93 (44%) males. A total of 111 (53%) belonged to governmental college, and 99 (47%) belonged to private college. There was no statistically significant difference between females and males in total knowledge (p<0.272) and confidence score (p<0.850), respectively. However, a statistically significant difference in knowledge and confidence between government and private colleges was found (p<0.001). A weakly positive significant correlation (r=0.217, p=0.002) was found between the total score of knowledge and the total score of confidence in performing surgical procedures. Conclusion: The study provides baseline data on the knowledge and perceived confidence of dental interns in Saudi Arabia about certain clinical procedures in oral surgery, where respondents were most knowledgeable in prescribing an appropriate medication. They were confident in giving effective local anaesthesia. All in all, interns had a superficial knowledge about the classification of impacted teeth and they were least confident in managing cases of an intraoral abscess.

scholarly journals Effects of Low Molecular Weight and Unfractionated Heparin on Lipoprotein Lipase and Lipid Profile in haemodialysis patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jan ◽  
Shah Jahan ◽  
Nighat Aziz ◽  
Sikandar Ali Khan ◽  
Asia Asia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Lipid Profile ◽  
Lipoprotein Lipase ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Age Distribution ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
P Value ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Study Population

Introduction: In haemodialysis patients, mortality from cardiovascular disease is much greater than in the general population. The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of two different types of heparin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and high molecular weight heparin (HMWH), on lipid profile in patients undergoing haemodialysis.Material & Methods: A total of 60 patients on haemodialysis were selected from two main hospitals of Lahore, Pakistan and were divided into two major groups based on the type of heparin used. A 5 ml blood sample was taken from the dialysis machine to get the serum and was kept frozen at -20ºC for analysis of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein. Comparison of lipoprotein lipase activity between groups were evaluated by using the student t-test. A P-value of ? 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Gender wise distribution of study population (n=60) was 67% (n=40) males and 33% (n=20) females. The age distribution of individuals varied from 39-43 years. Moreover, use of HMWH was high in males (73%) as compared to female (27%) with an average age of 39 ± 12 years where duration of haemodialysis was 4.44 ± 2.83. A significant difference in LPL activity related to different times in all patients was observed. A clearer difference observed in case of LDL where LPL activity was markedly different in both groups. Our data showed that individuals using LMWH had less chances of dyslipidaemia as compared to those using HMWH.Conclusion: LMWH is a useful and safe anticoagulant during haemodialysis as compared to HMWH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document