A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery

Introduction: As an essential step of total hip arthroplasty (THA), an effective and secure skin closure technique after primary THA is important. Metallic staples closure and subcuticular suture are the 2 common techniques for skin closure. However, which closure technique is the optimal skin-closure method remains unclear. The purpose of this prospective randomised clinical study was to compare the clinical outcomes and costs between staples and subcuticular suture techniques. Methods: In this clinical study, 165 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA through a posterolateral approach from August 2014 to May 2015 were included. According to skin closure technique, the patients were randomised into staples group (interrupted suture with staples, 83 cases) and sutures group (running 4-0 absorbable subcuticular suture, 82 cases). The same operative and perioperative care were provided to all patients. The surgical site infections (SSIs) rate, closure time, time to dry wounds and postoperative hospital stay were recorded and compared. Besides, cosmetic results and patient’s satisfaction were evaluated with Hollander wound evaluation score (HWES) and VAS score at postoperative 3 months follow-up respectively. Relative total costs were recorded as well. Results: It was shown that no infections developed in sutures group, while 2 postoperative superficial infections (2.4%) occurred in the staples group. There was a statistically significant difference in the time to dry surgical incisions and postoperative hospital stay favoring sutures (4.8 vs. 5.0 days, p = 0.028; 6.0 vs. 12.0 days, p<0.001, respectively). The cutaneous incision closure using staples consumed significantly less time than that with subcuticular suture (24.7 vs. 357.7 seconds, p<0.001). Moreover, there was no significant difference in HWES and patient’s satisfaction between the 2 groups. Finally, the application of subcuticular suture saved an average of $82.2 per case. Conclusions: Closure with running subcuticular suture is cheaper and appears to have a clinical advantage when compared with metallic staples skin closure in primary THA surgery. However, additional operating time may be incurred.

Download Full-text

Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after primary hip arthroplasty

Acta Orthopaedica Belgica ◽

10.52628/87.1.08 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 87 (1) ◽

pp. 55-64

Author(s):

Hany Elbardesy ◽

Rehan Gul ◽

Shane Guerin

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Skin Closure ◽

Patient’S Satisfaction ◽

Total Hip ◽

Significant Difference

High-quality and cost-effective health care are highly recommended especially in joint replacement surgeries, particularly in total hip arthroplasty. Therefore, it is indispensable for orthopaedic surgeons to spot the potential areas of quality improvement. Evaluating the efficacy of the different ways of skin closure is an unacknowledged topic. We performed this study following both the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- analyses Statement (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Articles were from any country, written in any language. We included all randomised control trials and retrospective cohort studies undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty who either received staples or subcuticular sutures for skin closure. The primary outcome was the incidence of wound infection. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), time to skin closure, total cost, and patient’s satisfaction. We included five studies in our cumulative meta- analysis. We conducted them using Review Manager V.5.0. We computed the risk ratio as a measure of the treatment effect, taking into account heterogeneity. We used Random-effect models. Primary skin closure with subcuticular sutures had insignificant marginal advantages for wound infections, LOS, and wound oozing. On the contrary, staples were more cost- effective and had less time for closure with higher patient’s satisfaction. Except for closure time and patient satisfaction , no significant difference between the two groups. The use of staples after THA may have several slight clinical advantages over the subcuticular sutures. However, owing to the complexities associated with wound closure, future clinical and laboratory studies assessing their complication outlines must be examined before an optimum technique can be determined.

Download Full-text

Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive without subcuticular suture for wound closure after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective observational study on thirty-two cases with controls for 3 months follow-up

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-020-01997-9 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Li-Shen Wang ◽

Xin-Yu Wang ◽

Hao-tian Tu ◽

Yi-Fan Huang ◽

Xin Qi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Tissue Adhesive ◽

Wound Complications ◽

Subcuticular Suture ◽

Total Hip ◽

Skin Staples ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Abstract Background Whether using tissue adhesive alone after subcutaneous suture can close the skin incision with safety as well as cosmetic appearance after total hip arthroplasty was not clear. Methods A prospective study was conducted. The same surgical methods were consistent throughout the entire study. After implanting prosthesis, the joint capsule was reconstructed. Fascial and subcutaneous layer were respectively closed by continuous running barbed suture. Patients were randomized allocated to group A with octyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive alone, to group B with tissue adhesive after continuous subcuticular suture, or to group C with skin staples. Time of closure, drainage, pain, wound complications, and cosmesis were compared. All data were analyzed statistically. Results There was no significant difference in drainage, Visual Analog Scale score or early wound complications between the three groups. However, there was significant difference in time of closure (P = 0.013). In pairwise comparison, time of closure in groups A and B was significantly longer than those in group C (P = 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively); time of closure in group A was significantly shorter than those in group B (P = 0.003). Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale total scores were not significantly different at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.078 and P = 0.284, respectively). Conclusion Tissue adhesive without subcuticular suture was similar with a combination of subcuticular suture and tissue adhesive as well skin staples in terms of safety and cosmetic appearance after total hip arthroplasty.

Download Full-text

Staples Versus Sutures For Skin Closure In Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis And Systematic Review

10.21203/rs.3.rs-958981/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Zirui Liu ◽

Binfeng Liu ◽

Hao Yang ◽

Liang Zhao

Keyword(s):

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Operating Time ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Skin Closure ◽

Risk Of Infection ◽

Patient’S Satisfaction ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Suture Group ◽

Prolonged Discharge

Abstract Objective: The purpose of this present study was to estimate complication and other outcomes associated with staples and sutures closure after hip arthroplasty through meta- analysis techniques and system review. Methods: We searched for articles on EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. Eligibility of the searched trials. Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software is used to perform meta-analysis.Results: Four randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort trial chosen into our study. Our study indicated that the risk of infection and prolonged discharge higher with staples than with sutures for skin closure after hip arthroplasty. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in allergic reaction, dehiscence, inflammation, abscess formation, Hollander Wound Evaluation Score and patient's satisfaction with skin closure methods between the two groups after hip arthroplasty. However, the suture group may require additional operating time.Conclusions: Closure with suture have a lower risk of infection and prolonged discharge when compared with staples skin closure in hip arthroplasty, while it may take more time.

Download Full-text

A new waterproof, breathable, bacteriostatic, low-cost dressing system with a decreased number of dressing changes in primary total hip arthroplasty: a feasibility study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-551094/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Shilong Su ◽

Chenggong Wang ◽

Fawei Gao ◽

Pengfei Lei ◽

Da Zhong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽

Wound Complications ◽

Clinical Safety ◽

Postoperative Wound ◽

Total Hip ◽

Vas Score ◽

Surgical Wounds

Abstract Background Postoperative wound complication is a major risk factor for the development of Periprosthetic joint infection, thus, it is very important to manage surgical wounds. We innovatively invented a new dressing system to reduce the occurrence of postoperative wound complications and improve the quality of life of patients after an total hip arthroplasty. Besides, this study confirmed the clinical safety and feasibility of the newly invented dressing system. Methods A total of 120 patients who underwent primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in this study. The data collected included the number of dressing changes, costs of the dressings, postoperative hospital stay, The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, The Harris Hip Score (HHS), ASEPSIS score, The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES), wound complications, the frequency of showers and satisfaction. Data were statistically analyzed. Results The average number of dressing changes was 0.74 ± 0.46, while the average postoperative hospital stay was 3.67 ± 0.97 days. The average cost of the new dressings throughout a treatment cycle was 57.42 ± 15.18 dollars. The VAS score decreased from 5.63 ± 1.09 before the operation to 0.88 ± 0.54 one month after the operation. The HHS score increased from 70.18 ± 7.84 before the operation to 80.36 ± 4.08 one month after the operation. The results of the four indexes of the ASEPSIS score were all 0. The SBSES score was 3.55 ± 0.61 at two weeks after the operation, and 4.38 ± 0.71 at one month after the operation. No wound complications were recorded until one month after the operation when the satisfaction rate was 92.53 ± 3.62%. Conclusion In this study, we have invented a new dressing system for surgical wounds after total hip arthroplasty and confirmed its clinical safety and feasibility. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000033822. Registered 13 June 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=54735

Download Full-text

Staples versus sutures for skin closure in hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-021-02870-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Zirui Liu ◽

Binfeng Liu ◽

Hao Yang ◽

Liang Zhao

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Operating Time ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Skin Closure ◽

Superficial Infection ◽

Patient’S Satisfaction ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Prolonged Discharge

Abstract Objective The purpose of the present study was to estimate complications and other outcomes associated with staple and suture closure after hip arthroplasty through meta-analysis techniques and a systematic review. Methods We searched for articles in EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. To determine the eligibility of the searched trials, Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results Five randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort trial were included in our study. Our study indicated that for skin closure after hip arthroplasty, the risks of superficial infection and prolonged discharge were higher with staples than with sutures. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of allergic reaction, dehiscence, inflammation, abscess formation, the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale or patient's satisfaction with skin closure methods. However, suturing required a longer operating time. Conclusions Closure with sutures is associated with lower risks of superficial infection and prolonged discharge than closure with staples following hip arthroplasty, but it may take more time.

Download Full-text

Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an earlier return to work compared to a straight-stem design

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-82805-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Georg Hauer ◽

Maria Smolle ◽

Sabrina Zaussinger ◽

Joerg Friesenbichler ◽

Andreas Leithner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Sick Leave ◽

Return To Work ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Short Stem ◽

Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis ◽

Stem Design ◽

Total Hip ◽

Straight Stem ◽

Significant Difference

AbstractReturn to work (RTW) has been specifically identified as a high priority in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). This investigation sought to assess the effect of the stem design on patients’ RTW. Secondly, the study aimed to identify risk factors that lead to a delayed RTW. Questionnaires inquiring about RTW, employment history, educational level, type of work, physical demands and joint awareness were administered by post. Further data were collected from patients’ hospital records. 176 patients who underwent THA using a short-stem and 97 patients using a straight-stem design were compared. The median return to work time was 10 weeks [IQR 7–14 weeks], with no significant difference between the two groups (short stems vs. straight stems; 10 [IQR 7–14] vs. 11 [7.5–13.5] weeks; p = 0.693). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, self-employment vs. employee (p = 0.001), dimension of preoperative workload (p = 0.001), preoperative sick leave (p < 0.001), and hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.001) independently affected the period until work was resumed. The Forgotten-Joint-Score-12 showed no significant difference between the two groups. The data show that the majority of THA patients can expect to resume work and stem design has no impact on RTW. Employees with preoperative sick leave, prolonged hospital LOS and low workload are at higher risk for a delayed RTW.

Download Full-text

Comparison of short-term outcomes of anterolateral supine approach and posterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology ◽

10.1186/s10195-021-00570-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Taku Ukai ◽

Goro Ebihara ◽

Masahiko Watanabe

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

External Rotation ◽

Posterolateral Approach ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Total Hip ◽

Hip Flexion ◽

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate postoperative pain and functional and clinical outcomes of anterolateral supine (ALS) and posterolateral (PL) approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. Materials and methods We retrospectively examined the joints of 110 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The ALS group was compared with the PL group using the pain visual analog scale (VAS) and narcotic consumption as pain outcomes. Functional outcomes included postoperative range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion, day on which patients could perform straight leg raising (SLR), day on which patients began using a walker or cane, duration of hospital stay, rate of transfer, and strength of hip muscles. Clinical outcomes included pre and postoperative Harris Hip Scores. Results No significant differences were found in the pain VAS scores or narcotic consumption between the two groups. The PL group could perform SLR earlier than the ALS group (P < 0.01). The ALS group started using a cane earlier (P < 0.01) and had a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.01) than the PL group. Degrees of active ROM of flexion at postoperative day (POD) 1 were significantly lower in the ALS group than in the PL group (P < 0.01). Regarding hip muscle strength, hip flexion was significantly weaker in the ALS group than in the PL group until 1-month POD (P < 0.01). External rotation from 2 weeks to 6 months postoperatively was significantly weaker in the PL group than in the ALS group (P < 0.01). Conclusion The ALS approach was more beneficial than the PL approach because ALS enabled better functional recovery of the strength of external rotation, improved rehabilitation, and involved a shorter hospital stay. Level of Evidence Level IV retrospective observational study.

Download Full-text

Revision Rates After Surgical Treatment for Femoral Neck Fractures: Results of 2-Year Follow-up

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina49030022 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 49 (3) ◽

pp. 22

Author(s):

Jaunius Kurtinaitis ◽

Narūnas Porvaneckas ◽

Giedrius Kvederas ◽

Tomas Butėnas ◽

Valentinas Uvarovas

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Neck ◽

Internal Fixation ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Femoral Neck Fractures ◽

Total Hip ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Surgery Rates

Background and Objective. Intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck account for a major share of fractures in the elderly. Open reduction and internal fixation has been shown to have a higher rate of revision surgery than arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the rates of revision surgery performed after internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty. Material and Methods. Between 2004 and 2006, 681 intracapsular femoral neck fractures in 679 consecutive patients were treated with internal fixation or total hip arthroplasty at our institution. Revision surgery rates were evaluated at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Results. There was no significant difference in the ratio of internal fixation to total hip arthroplasty during 2004–2006 (P=0.31). The mean rate of total hip arthroplasty was 19.1% with a lower rate being among patients younger than 60 years. Revision surgery rates at the 2-year followup were higher in the internal fixation group compared with total hip arthroplasty group (28.9% vs. 7.0%, P<0.001). Patients who underwent internal fixation were at a 4-fold greater risk of having revision surgery at the 2-year follow-up than those who underwent total hip arthroplasty (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.95–8.65; P<0.001). Age was a significant risk factor for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87–0.98; P=0.02), but not significant after the internal fixation (P=0.86). Conclusions. Higher revision surgery rates after internal fixation favors arthroplasty as a primary choice of treatment for the femoral neck fractures.

Download Full-text

Combination Therapy with Continuous Three-in-One Femoral Nerve Block and Periarticular Multimodal Drug Infiltration after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Pain Research and Management ◽

10.1155/2016/1425201 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2016 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Tomonori Tetsunaga ◽

Tomoko Tetsunaga ◽

Kazuo Fujiwara ◽

Hirosuke Endo ◽

Toshifumi Ozaki

Keyword(s):

Side Effects ◽

Pain Relief ◽

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Nerve Block ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Nerve Block ◽

Femoral Nerve ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay

Background. Various postoperative pain relief modalities, including continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), local infiltration analgesia (LIA), and combination therapy, have been reported for total knee arthroplasty. However, no studies have compared CFNB with LIA for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CFNB versus LIA after THA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the postoperative outcomes of 93 THA patients (20 men, 73 women; mean age 69.2 years). Patients were divided into three groups according to postoperative analgesic technique: CFNB, LIA, or combined CFNB+LIA. We measured the following postoperative outcome parameters: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, supplemental analgesia, side effects, mobilization, length of hospital stay, and Harris Hip Score (HHS). Results. The CFNB+LIA group had significantly lower VAS pain scores than the CFNB and LIA groups on postoperative day 1. There were no significant differences among the three groups in use of supplemental analgesia, side effects, mobilization, length of hospital stay, or HHS at 3 months after THA. Conclusions. Although there were no clinically significant differences in outcomes among the three groups, combination therapy with CFNB and LIA provided better pain relief after THA than CFNB or LIA alone, with few side effects.

Download Full-text

Total hip arthroplasty for high-riding hips: A retrospective analysis of 79 cases and proposal of a new classification

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery ◽

10.1177/2309499020924164 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 28 (2) ◽

pp. 230949902092416

Author(s):

İsmail Demirkale ◽

Yüksel Uğur Yaradılmış ◽

Ahmet Ateş ◽

Murat Altay

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Classification System ◽

Operating Time ◽

Limb Length Discrepancy ◽

Harris Hip Score ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Total Hip ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Functional Scores

Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for high-riding hips is a complex procedure and the requirement for subtrochanteric osteotomy (STO) is an important decision that needs to be taken preoperatively. STO renders this complex surgery even more complicated and there are no guidelines to determine the STO requirement. In this study, the outcomes of THA for patients with high-riding hips were evaluated and a practical classification system is proposed to predict any osteotomy requirement. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of 79 hips of 76 patients who underwent THA for high-riding hip dysplasia. The amount of shortening in patients with STO and in patients without STO was compared. All patients were evaluated in respect of Harris hip score, operating time, erythrocyte suspension need, and actual limb length discrepancy. Preoperative radiographs were classified into four types according to the ratio of the distance between the lesser trochanter and the ischial tuberosity with pelvic height (LT-IT/P) to grade the degree of dislocation. Results: The mean follow-up was 30 ± 6.54 months. STO was applied to 47 (60%) hips and not to 32 (40%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in respect of the functional scores. STO prolonged the operating time and increased the need for blood transfusion ( p = 0.026, p < 0.001, respectively). When the LT-IT/P index was <0.19 (type 1), no additional surgical approach was required for reduction, at 0.19–0.29 (type 2), the head can be safely reduced with additional reduction methods, and when >0.3 (type 3), a shortening osteotomy will most likely be required. The rate of complications is increased if LT-IT/P is >0.4 (type 4). Conclusion: STO adjunct to THA increases the rate of complications. This practical classification system may guide the surgeon in the decision of whether an STO should be added to the procedure or not. Level of evidence: Level III, clinical trial

Download Full-text