scholarly journals Aturan Percakapan Aa Gym dalam Dakwah

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-128
Author(s):  
Wahyu Dinata Dulhote ◽  
Restu Triarti Putri
Keyword(s):  
Paul Grice

Sekian banyak ustadz yang berdakwah, Aa Gym adalah salah satu ustadz yang menarik untuk diteliti, lantaran perkataan nya banyak membuat orang tafakur dan sadar diri, sehingga banyak para jamaah yang bertergantungan untuk hadir secara rutin ke pengajian nya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui aturan percakapan Aa Gym dalam dakwah nya, yang meliputi : bagaimana perkataan kuantitasnya, perkataan berkualitasnya, perkataan relevannya, dan perkataan berprilakunya. Sehingga menarik untuk dibahas. Adapun metode yang digunakan adalah Metode penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif, dimaksudkan agar mempermudah mendeskripsikan suatu kasus yang lebih spesifik. Hasil penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa dakwah Aa Gym memenuhi standart teori aturan percakapan yang ditemukan oleh Paul Grice yang mana percakapan Aa Gym dengan jamaah nya menggunakan perkataan berkuantitas (quantity maxim), perkataan berkualitas (quality maxim), perkataan relevan (relevancy maxim) maupun perkataan berprilaku (manner maxim). Adapun penelitian ini memperkaya kajian komunikasi islam dalam kajian khitobah atau tabligh dalam memanfaatkan teori komunikasi dari Paul Grice.

Paul Grice

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Paul Grice

Intimation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. F. Ferrari
Keyword(s):  
Social Life ◽  
Relevance Theory ◽  
Self Presentation ◽  
Erving Goffman ◽  
Strongly Connected ◽  
Dan Sperber ◽  
Paul Grice

The communicative scale is introduced. What is fundamental to communication is the intention of the communicator rather than the codes that languages employ. Following the model first proposed by Paul Grice and developed in Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson’s ‘relevance theory’, the structure of communicative intentionality is understood to be recursive: its underlying form is ‘I want you to know that I want you to know’. This leaves room for a simpler kind of transmission, to be called ‘intimation’, whose underlying form would be ‘I want you to know’. If communication is a transmission at the ‘full-on’ position of the scale, and if the switch is off when no communication is intended, then intimation would be at the intermediate, ‘half-on’ position. Intimation is particularly useful in contexts where discretion, suggestiveness, or plausible deniability are needed. It is strongly connected to self-presentation in social life (as studied by Erving Goffman).

scholarly journals Resenha de "Arquitetura da Conversação", de Roberta Pires de Oliveria e Renato Miguel Basso

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Arthur Pagani
Keyword(s):  
Paul Grice

Apresenta-se aqui a resenha do livro "Arquitetura de Conversação, escrito por Roberta Pires de Oliveira e Renato Miguel Basso; o livro apresenta e discute criticamente a noção de 'implicatura', devida ao filósofo Paul Grice.

scholarly journals COOPERATIVE AND POLITENESS PRINCIPLES IN UTTERANCES

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-283
Author(s):  
Asri Syawalia ◽  
Dini Wulansari ◽  
Asrul Munazar
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Principle ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Paul Grice ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

A cooperative and polite language is required to achieve the goal of conversation, either to deliver an idea or express feelings. In spite of that, the rule of cooperative principle proposed by Paul Grice is different from the rule of politeness principle proposed by Geoffrey Leech. Therefore, this study aims to find out the application of both principles and the relation between the two of them in utterances. To conduct this study, an American movie titled Isn't It Romantic was chosen as the subject. The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative. The findings show that there are 53 data of the application of cooperative and politeness principles. Therefore, there is a correlation between the cooperative and politeness principles in the conversations of this movie. The result of this study is expected to be a guideline to create an ideal conversation in society.

scholarly journals Presupposition: What went wrong?

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauri Karttunen
Keyword(s):  
First Generation ◽  
Definite Descriptions ◽  
Turn Of The Century ◽  
Bertrand Russell ◽  
The Rich ◽  
To Come ◽  
King Of France ◽  
Aspectual Verbs ◽  
Paul Grice ◽  
Presupposition Triggers

When the first generation of generative linguists discovered presuppositions in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the initial set of examples was quite small. Aspectual verbs like stop were discussed already by Greek philosophers, proper names, Kepler, and definite descriptions, the present king of France, go back to Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell by the turn of the century. Just in the span of a few years my generation of semanticists assembled a veritable zoo of ‘presupposition triggers’ under the assumption that they were all of the same species. Generations of students have learned about presuppositions from Stephen Levinson’s 1983 book on Pragmatics that contains a list of 13 types of presupposition triggers, an excerpt of an even longer unpublished list attributed to a certain Lauri Karttunen. My task in this presentation is to come clean and show why the items on Levinson’s list should not have been lumped together. In retrospect it is strange that the early writings about presupposition by linguists and even by philosophers like Robert Stalnaker or Scott Soames do not make any reference to the rich palette of semantic relations they could have learned from Frege and later from Paul Grice. If we had known Frege’s concepts of Andeutung – Grice’s conventional implicature – and Nebengedanke, it would have been easy to see that there are types of author commitment that are neither entailments nor presuppositions. 

scholarly journals Sobre adesões e críticas ao modelo de usuário racional em pragmática: o recurso à psicanálise

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel do Nascimento e SILVA ◽  
Paulo Sérgio de SOUZA JR.
Keyword(s):  
John Searle ◽  
Paul Grice

RESUMO Este trabalho revisita a noção de usuário em vertentes anglo-americanas e continentais da pragmática linguística. Delineamos alguns dos pressupostos da ideia de usuário racional, defendida por filósofos como Paul Grice e John Searle, bem como algumas assunções da crítica a esse modelo, realizada por pragmaticistas de tradições continentais, discursivas ou brasileiras. Historicamente, identificamos, nas primeiras décadas da pragmática linguística (1980 e 90), um recurso frequente à psicanálise na desconstrução do modelo de usuário racional - diálogo que foi se tornando rarefeito nas décadas seguintes. Aventamos que a possível natureza dessa atual recusa encontra-se numa intepretação equivocada de que a psicanálise seja uma teoria do indivíduo, ao passo que a pragmática seria uma teoria da sociedade. Apontamos, finalmente, para a premência do diálogo entre pragmática e psicanálise, sobretudo porque os campos têm compartilhado uma vigorosa crítica ao indivíduo intencional.

Paul Grice

Philosophy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Benton
Keyword(s):  
Personal Identity ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Cooperative Principle ◽  
Philosophy Of Perception ◽  
Historical Figures ◽  
Logical Paradoxes ◽  
And Linguistics ◽  
Paul Grice ◽  
British Philosopher

Herbert Paul Grice (b. 1913–d. 1988) was a British philosopher and linguist, and one of the pivotal figures in philosophy during the 20th century. He wrote in many areas of philosophy, including the metaphysics of personal identity, logical paradoxes, the analytic/synthetic distinction, the philosophy of perception, philosophical psychology, and ethics. He also wrote on historical figures such as Aristotle, Descartes, Hume, and Kant. But his most significant contributions came in philosophy of language and mind, on meaning, intention, presupposition, conversation, and the theory of communication. Grice argued for an intention-based theory of meaning, and he was the first to illustrate the distinction between what came to be called semantic and pragmatic meaning, that is, between what a speaker’s utterance (or its utterance “type”) means in the abstract, and what else a speaker can mean by uttering it in a particular context. Grice highlighted this by an appeal to his framework of the Cooperative Principle and its Conversational Maxims, which are plausibly assumed by conversational participants and provide mechanisms for the ways in which speakers can “conversationally implicate” something beyond the literal meaning of what they say, and for how hearers can recover those “implicatures.’” Grice’s enduring influence on these topics helped found the burgeoning discipline in philosophy of language and linguistics now known as “pragmatics” (compare the Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy article on “Pragmatics”).

PRAGMATICS: CRITICAL CONCEPTS. VOL. 1: DAWN AND DELINEATION. VOL. 2: SPEECH ACT THEORY AND PARTICULAR SPEECH ACTS. VOL. 3: INDEXICALS AND REFERENCE. VOL. 4: PRESUPPOSITION, IMPLICATURE, AND INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS. VOL. 5: COMMUNICATION, INTERACTION, AND DISCOURSE. VOL. 6: PRAGMATICS: GRAMMAR, PSYCHOLOGY, AND SOCIOLOGY.Asa Kasher (Ed.). London: Routledge, 1998. Vol. 1: Pp. xi + 154. Vol. 2: Pp. vi + 511. Vol. 3: Pp. 217. Vol. 4: Pp. vi + 722. Vol. 5: Pp. vi + 490. Vol. 6: Pp. vi + 559. $905.00 cloth.

2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-122
Author(s):  
Susan Foster-Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Second Language Acquisition ◽  
Language Acquisition ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
First Language ◽  
Free Standing ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Indirect Speech Acts ◽  
Dan Sperber ◽  
Paul Grice ◽  
François Recanati

This six-volume, beautifully bound, boxed set contains 112 reprinted papers covering the history and development of modern theoretical pragmatics from its beginnings back in the 1940s and '50s with Charles Morris, Rudolf Camap, Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, via the major works in the 1970s of those such as Stalnaker, Bach and Hamish, J. L. Austin, John Searle, and Paul Grice, to the more recent contributions of, among many others, Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson, François Recanati, and Anna Wierzbicka. The bulk of the contributions, either free-standing papers or sections from books, come out of what one might term a philosophical approach to pragmatics, but toward the end of the collection there is an attempt to cover more ethnographically rooted approaches and even to get into applied pragmatic issues related to aphasia, first language acquisition, second language acquisition (one paper), and politics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document