Can integrated palliative care services enhance the quality of end-of-life cancer care?

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-ching Law
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 52-52
Author(s):  
Jessica Cerni ◽  
Joel Rhee ◽  
Hassan Hosseinzadeh

52 Background: Despite the advances in end-of-life cancer care, disparities exist in the availability, accessibility and use of palliative care services across the urban-rural continuum. This review explores this disparity by synthesising retrospective quantitative studies on palliative care patterns of resource use for adults during end-of-life cancer care. Methods: Five databases were searched and data analysed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria involved; a) original research; b) quantitative studies; c) English-language; d) study assessed palliative care related service use in adult (18yrs+) cancer patients with any malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancer; e) exclusive end of life focus and f) urban-rural focus. Narrative reviews and discussions were excluded. Results: After reviewing all titles and abstracts ( N= 816) and full text review ( N= 163) 44 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. End-of-life palliative care access and utilisation patterns varied across the geographical urban-rural continuum. Geographical region of residence had the strongest association with multiple ED visits and hospitalizations in rural or remote areas. Most common palliative care services used within the last 30 days of death were ED visits and hospital admissions. Two studies assessed palliative radiotherapy and one study assessed palliative care pharmacotherapy. The odds of palliative service use were lowest for males and individuals with a survival diagnosis (0-3months). The largest inequities were explained by individual level factors including gender as assessed in ( N= 44 studies), socioeconomic status ( N= 15), proximity to service ( N= 10) and survival time from cancer diagnosis ( N= 9). Conclusions: Rurality was an important predictor for poorer outcomes in the quality of end-of-life cancer care. Findings suggest that addressing the urban-rural continuum is critical for equitable, timely and efficient palliative cancer care. Further research is required to understand barriers to service usage to achieve optimal palliative care.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azza A. Hassan ◽  
Hassan Mohsen ◽  
Ayman A. Allam ◽  
Pascale Haddad

Purpose Quality of end-of-life (EOL) care is a key component of excellence in cancer care, and monitoring indicators for quality of EOL cancer care is crucial to providing excellent care. The aim of the current study is to describe the relative aggressiveness of EOL cancer care in the state of Qatar and to compare it with international figures. Methods We analyzed all deaths from cancer in Qatar between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. A total of 784 eligible patients were studied to assess aggressiveness of cancer care at EOL. Results The average number of intensive care unit admissions per person decreased from 0.44 to 0.22 (P < .001) over the period of study. In addition, patients spent fewer days in the intensive care unit (2.79 to 1.82 days; P = .006) and made fewer visits to the emergency department (1.00 to 0.52 visits; P < .001) in the last 30 days of life. Fewer patients had at least one aggressive treatment measure at EOL during the 5-year period (82.3% to 71.0%; P = .038). The mean composite score for aggressiveness of EOL care decreased from 2.24 to 1.92 (P < .01). Conclusion The aggressiveness of EOL cancer care has significantly decreased over time in Qatar; however, despite this decrease, the rate is still higher than that reported internationally. The integration of community palliative care services in Qatar may further decrease the aggressiveness of cancer care at EOL.


2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Gagnon ◽  
Lyne Nadeau ◽  
Susan Scott ◽  
Serge Dumont ◽  
Neil MacDonald ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milagros Silva ◽  
Margaux Genoff ◽  
Alexandra Zaballa ◽  
Stacy Marie Stabler ◽  
Francesca Gany ◽  
...  

123 Background: According to the 2011 U.S. Census 60% of people living in the U.S. speak a language other than English at home, and of these approximately 40% have limited English proficiency (LEP). Language barriers can affect the health outcomes of LEP patients and the use of trained interpreters can improve patient-physician communication. Since effective communication is the cornerstone of delivering adequate palliative care, a systematic review was conducted to determine the impact of interpreters on the delivery of palliative care services to LEP patients with cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature search in all available languages of 6 databases from 1966 and 2013. Studies evaluated interpreter interventions for LEP patients receiving palliative care services. Of 38 references, 11 articles were found by multiple reviewers to meet inclusion criteria. Data were collected on the study design, size, comparison groups, outcomes, and interpreter characteristics. Results: A total of 6 qualitative and 5 quantitative studies assessed the use of interpreters. All studies found that the quality of care provided to LEP patients receiving palliative services is affected by communication. Most studies showed that when no trained interpreters were used, LEP patients and families had inadequate understanding about their diagnosis or prognosis during goals of care conversations, and worse symptom management at end of life including pain and anxiety. Half of the studies concluded that trained interpreters are not utilized adequately and several suggested that pre-meetings between clinicians and interpreters are important to discuss topics and terminology to be used during goals of care conversations. Conclusions: Published studies show worse outcomes during end of life care and goals of care discussions when trained interpreters are not used. Moreover, trained interpreters are not being used appropriately in the field. More clinically relevant studies are needed to improve the quality of care provided to LEP patients and families receiving palliative services.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
T. N. Ansatbaeva ◽  
D. R. Kaidarova ◽  
G. Zh. Kunirova ◽  
N. А. Izmagambetov

Relevance: Patients with advanced malignant neoplasms require constant monitoring and care. Mobile palliative care (PC) is one of the modern humanistic methods of supporting terminal cancer patients, as well as their relatives. The purpose of this study was to analyze the demand and satisfaction of the population with in-home PC services for cancer patients provided by mobile teams in Almaty. Results: According to WHO, the number of people who need PС services at the end of life is 20.4 million, of whom 94% are adults (69% are over 60 years, 25% are at the age of 15 to 59), and 6% are children. 34% of patients dying from cancer need PC services at the end of life. 80% of people in need of PC services live in lower-middle-income countries. At the end of 2018, the total number of palliative beds deployed in the Republic of Kazakhstan amounted to 415 (vs. 373 in 2017). Conclusion: Given the practical relevance and topicality, there is an urgent need to develop evidence-based recommendations for optimizing the provision of PC services, as well as improving the quality of life of cancer patients


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
Francis Odukwe ◽  
Francis Ezeh

In 1990, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recognised palliative care as a distinct specialty dedicated to relieving suffering and improving quality of life for patients with life-limiting illnesses or serious injuries. Fourteen years later, the WHO in its publication ‘ Global Atlas of Palliative Care at the End of Life’, projected that, ‘each year in the world, around 377 per 100,000 of the adult (over 15 years of age) population and 63 per 100,000 of the child population (under 15 years of age) will require “palliative care at the end of life’. This article will discuss what constitutes palliative care, the different elements of palliative care, the approaches to palliative care, specialist palliative care services, end of life care and where GPs fit into this area. We will also be sharing tips on providing palliative care as a GP and for GP trainees.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 880-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Smith ◽  
Sarah Temin ◽  
Erin R. Alesi ◽  
Amy P. Abernethy ◽  
Tracy A. Balboni ◽  
...  

Purpose An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership following publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This PCO addresses the integration of palliative care services into standard oncology practice at the time a person is diagnosed with metastatic or advanced cancer. Clinical Context Palliative care is frequently misconstrued as synonymous with end-of-life care. Palliative care is focused on the relief of suffering, in all of its dimensions, throughout the course of a patient's illness. Although the use of hospice and other palliative care services at the end of life has increased, many patients are enrolled in hospice less than 3 weeks before their death, which limits the benefit they may gain from these services. By potentially improving quality of life (QOL), cost of care, and even survival in patients with metastatic cancer, palliative care has increasing relevance for the care of patients with cancer. Until recently, data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating the benefits of palliative care in patients with metastatic cancer who are also receiving standard oncology care have not been available. Recent Data Seven published RCTs form the basis of this PCO. Provisional Clinical Opinion Based on strong evidence from a phase III RCT, patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer should be offered concurrent palliative care and standard oncologic care at initial diagnosis. While a survival benefit from early involvement of palliative care has not yet been demonstrated in other oncology settings, substantial evidence demonstrates that palliative care—when combined with standard cancer care or as the main focus of care—leads to better patient and caregiver outcomes. These include improvement in symptoms, QOL, and patient satisfaction, with reduced caregiver burden. Earlier involvement of palliative care also leads to more appropriate referral to and use of hospice, and reduced use of futile intensive care. While evidence clarifying optimal delivery of palliative care to improve patient outcomes is evolving, no trials to date have demonstrated harm to patients and caregivers, or excessive costs, from early involvement of palliative care. Therefore, it is the Panel's expert consensus that combined standard oncology care and palliative care should be considered early in the course of illness for any patient with metastatic cancer and/or high symptom burden. Strategies to optimize concurrent palliative care and standard oncology care, with evaluation of its impact on important patient and caregiver outcomes (eg, QOL, survival, health care services utilization, and costs) and on society, should be an area of intense research. NOTE. ASCO's provisional clinical opinions (PCOs) reflect expert consensus based on clinical evidence and literature available at the time they are written and are intended to assist physicians in clinical decision making and identify questions and settings for further research. Because of the rapid flow of scientific information in oncology, new evidence may have emerged since the time a PCO was submitted for publication. PCOs are not continually updated and may not reflect the most recent evidence. PCOs cannot account for individual variation among patients and cannot be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other treatments. It is the responsibility of the treating physician or other health care provider, relying on independent experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine the best course of treatment for the patient. Accordingly, adherence to any PCO is voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding its application to be made by the physician in light of each patient's individual circumstances. ASCO PCOs describe the use of procedures and therapies in clinical trials and cannot be assumed to apply to the use of these interventions in the context of clinical practice. ASCO assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage to persons or property arising out of or related to any use of ASCO's PCOs, or for any errors or omissions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-71
Author(s):  
Henry O’Lawrence ◽  
Rohan Chowlkar

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine the cost effectiveness of palliative care on patients in a home health and hospice setting. Secondary data set was utilized to test the hypotheses of this study. Home health care and hospice care services have the potential to avert hospital admissions in patients requiring palliative care, which significantly affects medicare spending. With the aging population, it has become evident that demand of palliative care will increase four-fold. It was determined that current spending on end-of-life care is radically emptying medicare funds and fiscally weakening numerous families who have patients under palliative care during life-threatening illnesses. The study found that a majority of people registering for palliative and hospice care settings are above the age group of 55 years old. Design/methodology/approach Different variables like length of stay, mode of payment and disease diagnosis were used to filter the available data set. Secondary data were utilized to test the hypothesis of this study. There are very few studies on hospice and palliative care services and no study focuses on the cost associated with this care. Since a very large number of the USA, population is turning 65 and over, it is very important to analyze the cost of care for palliative and hospice care. For the purpose of this analysis, data were utilized from the National Home and Hospice Care Survey (NHHCS), which has been conducted periodically by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests and t-tests were used to test for statistical significance at the p<0.05 level. Findings The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was utilized for this result. H1 predicted that patients in the age group of 65 years and up have the highest utilization of home and hospice care. This study examined various demographic variables in hospice and home health care which may help to evaluate the cost of care and the modes of payments. This section of the result presents the descriptive analysis of dependent, independent and covariate variables that provide the overall national estimates on differences in use of home and hospice care in various age groups and sex. Research limitations/implications The data set used was from the 2007 NHHCS survey, no data have been collected thereafter, and therefore, gap in data analysis may give inaccurate findings. To compensate for this gap in the data set, recent studies were reviewed which analyzed cost in palliative care in the USA. There has been a lack of evidence to prove the cost savings and improved quality of life in palliative/hospice care. There is a need for new research on the various cost factors affecting palliative care services as well as considering the quality of life. Although, it is evident that palliative care treatment is less expensive as compared to the regular care, since it eliminates the direct hospitalization cost, but there is inadequate research to prove that it improves the quality of life. A detailed research is required considering the additional cost incurred in palliative/hospice care services and a cost-benefit analysis of the same. Practical implications While various studies reporting information applicable to the expenses and effect of family caregiving toward the end-of-life were distinguished, none of the previous research discussed this issue as their central focus. Most studies addressed more extensive financial effect of palliative and end-of-life care, including expenses borne by the patients themselves, the medicinal services framework and safety net providers or beneficent/willful suppliers. This shows a significant hole in the current writing. Social implications With the aging population, it has become evident that demand of palliative/hospice care will increase four-fold. The NHHCS have stopped keeping track of the palliative care requirements after 2007, which has a negative impact on the growing needs. Cost analysis can only be performed by analyzing existing data. This review has recognized a huge niche in the evidence base with respect to the cost cares of giving care and supporting a relative inside a palliative/hospice care setting. Originality/value The study exhibited that cost diminishments in aggressive medications can take care of the expenses of palliative/hospice care services. The issue of evaluating result in such a physically measurable way is complicated by the impalpable nature of large portions of the individual components of outcome. Although physical and mental well-being can be evaluated to a certain degree, it is significantly more difficult to gauge in a quantifiable way, the social and profound measurements of care that help fundamentally to general quality of care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 788-788
Author(s):  
Daniel David ◽  
Abraham Brody ◽  
Tina Sadarangani ◽  
Bei Wu ◽  
Tara Cortez

Abstract Many residents of Assisted Living (AL) confront serious illness and therefore might benefit from greater access to Palliative Care Services to improve quality of life. We surveyed resident records and AL nursing staff to identify patients in need of Palliative Care. Preliminary findings showed that nurses predicted 23% would not be alive and 49% would no longer live in AL. A majority of residents were over the age of 90, yet 30% did not have a reported code status. These findings suggest that a substantial portion of AL residents may have unmet needs with respect to palliative care. Future interventions are needed to support advance care planning conversations and make palliative care more accessible to this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document