scholarly journals Molecular Profiles of Pre- and Postoperative Breast Cancer Tumours Reveal Differentially Expressed Genes

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margit L. H. Riis ◽  
Torben Lüders ◽  
Elke K. Markert ◽  
Vilde D. Haakensen ◽  
Anne-Jorun Nesbakken ◽  
...  

Gene expression studies on breast cancer have generally been performed on tissue obtained at the time of surgery. In this study, we have compared the gene expression profiles in preoperative tissue (core needle biopsies) while tumor is still in its normal milieu to postoperative tissue from the same tumor obtained during surgery. Thirteen patients were included of which eleven had undergone sentinel node diagnosis procedure before operation. Microarray gene expression analysis was performed using total RNA from all the samples. Paired significance analysis of microarrays revealed 228 differently expressed genes, including several early response stress-related genes such as members of the fos and jun families as well as genes of which the expression has previously been associated with cancer. The expression profiles found in the analyses of breast cancer tissue must be evaluated with caution. Different profiles may simply be the result of differences in the surgical trauma and timing of when samples are taken and not necessarily associated with tumor biology.

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
E. Lopez-Munoz ◽  
N. Garcia-Hernandez ◽  
R. I. Penaloza-Espinosa ◽  
M. E. Gomez-Del Toro ◽  
G. Zarco-Espinosa ◽  
...  

The detection of circulating breast cancer cells in blood could be of special interest as an indicator of diagnosis and prognosis, and for the selection of treatment. In a previous report, our research group determined gene expression profiles in samples of breast cancer tissue, identifying over-expression of the BIK/NBK mRNA gene in 90% of the analyzed samples. In this paper, we analyze the BIK/NBK gene expression as a possible biomarker of circulating breast cancer cells in blood. We demonstrate that the BIK/NBK gene expression is not a significant biomarker in the detection of circulating breast cancer cells in the blood of women with breast cancer. Several studies have evaluated the regulation of apoptosis by estrogens in breast cancer cells, demonstrating the importance of BIK/NBK protein, in estrogen-regulated breast cancer cell apoptosis, which suggests that the regulation of its expression may be an important therapeutic target or strategy in the management of cancer, and, although we did not find statistically significant differences among the patient groups to demonstrate that BIK/NBK gene expression is a biomarker of circulating breast cancer cells in blood, we consider it necessary to continue the study of this gene in breast cancer tissue and its role in the development and progression of breast cancer, its prognostic value, and its potential use as therapeutic target.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1547-1547
Author(s):  
Windy Marie Dean-Colomb ◽  
Rachel Martini ◽  
Akanksha Verma ◽  
Jason White ◽  
Olivier Elemento ◽  
...  

1547 Background: Due to persistent disparities in breast cancer mortality, there has been a renewed focus on investigating tumor biology. Deeper exploration has exposed distinctions in tumor biology based upon self-reported race and ancestry. The disparities associated with Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) across the modern African Diaspora suggests that there is a genetic ancestry connection between its aggressive tumor biology and clinical outcomes. Understanding this connection could hold the key to improving clinical outcomes in this group. Methods: We investigated 75 TNBC primary tumors using Self-Reported Race (SRR) groups: African American (AA, n = 42) and European American (EA, n = 33). Using best practices established by TCGA, we analyzed bulk RNA sequencing to measure changes in genome-wide expression levels. We next quantified global ancestry in a novel manner using RNAseq variants using 1000 Genomes as the reference data. We then identified African and European ancestry-associated genes using a logistic regression (adjusted FDR p < 0.05) between quantified ancestry and gene expression levels. Results: We identified > 150 genes associated with quantified African ancestry. We also found using quantified ancestry was a more robust method to screen for differentially expressed genes than SRR. Using an updated TNBC subtyping method, we noted higher incidences of Basal-like 2 tumors in AAs. Pathway analyses indicated several canonical cancer pathways; including, TP53, NFKB1 and AKT, have altered functionality in patients of African descent. For example, TP53-associated genes were activated in TNBC tumors of AA versus EA. This upregulation, rather than loss of function, is suggestive of polymorphic and/or ancestry-specific expression regulation, likely driven by population-private genetic variants. Lastly, we used TCGA data to validate a subset of African ancestry-specific genes that were upregulated in AA patients in our cohort. Specifically, PIM3, ZBTB22 and PPP2R4 each retained significant upregulation, in our cohort, but also TNBC tumors from TCGA (p = 0.0018, 0.023 and 0.022, respectively). Conclusions: Our study has uncovered ancestry-specific gene expression profiles in TNBC tumors. The distinct distribution of TNBC subtypes and altered functional oncologic pathways are evidence that biological underpinnings in TNBC can be driven by shared genetic ancestry. These findings emphasize the need to investigate patient populations of various ancestral origins in order to fully appreciate the molecular diversity in tumor biology for precision of disease management.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Burton ◽  
Mads Thomassen ◽  
Qihua Tan ◽  
Torben A. Kruse

Machine learning has increasingly been used with microarray gene expression data and for the development of classifiers using a variety of methods. However, method comparisons in cross-study datasets are very scarce. This study compares the performance of seven classification methods and the effect of voting for predicting metastasis outcome in breast cancer patients, in three situations: within the same dataset or across datasets on similar or dissimilar microarray platforms. Combining classification results from seven classifiers into one voting decision performed significantly better during internal validation as well as external validation in similar microarray platforms than the underlying classification methods. When validating between different microarray platforms, random forest, another voting-based method, proved to be the best performing method. We conclude that voting based classifiers provided an advantage with respect to classifying metastasis outcome in breast cancer patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ping ◽  
Xingyi Guo ◽  
Fei Ye ◽  
Jirong Long ◽  
Loren Lipworth ◽  
...  

Abstract African American (AA) women have an excess breast cancer mortality than European American (EA) women. To investigate the contribution of tumor biology to this survival health disparity, we compared gene expression profiles in breast tumors using RNA sequencing data derived from 260 AA and 155 EA women who were prospectively enrolled in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) and developed breast cancer during follow-up. We identified 59 genes (54 protein-coding genes and 5 long intergenic non-coding RNAs) that were expressed differently between EA and AA at a stringent false discovery rate (FDR) &lt; 0.01. A gene signature was derived with these 59 genes and externally validated using the publicly available Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data from180 AA and 838 EA breast cancer patients. Applying C-statistics, we found that this 59-gene signature has a high discriminative ability in distinguishing AA and EA breast cancer patients in the TCGA dataset (C-index = 0.81). These findings may provide new insight into tumor biological differences and the causes of the survival disparity between AA and EA breast cancer patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Babichev ◽  
A. I. Kornelyuk ◽  
V. I. Lytvynenko ◽  
V. V. Osypenko

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document