scholarly journals A Review of Equine Laparoscopy

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean A. Hendrickson
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
The Past ◽  
History Of

Minimally invasive surgery in the human was first identified in mid 900’s. The procedure as is more commonly practiced now was first reported in 1912. There have been many advances and new techniques developed in the past 100 years. Equine laparoscopy, was first reported in the 1970’s, and similarly has undergone much transformation in the last 40 years. It is now considered the standard of care in many surgical techniques such as cryptorchidectomy, ovariectomy, nephrosplenic space ablation, standing abdominal exploratory, and many other reproductive surgeries. This manuscript describes the history of minimally invasive surgery, and highlights many of the techniques that are currently performed in equine surgery. Special attention is given to instrumentation, ligating techniques, and the surgical principles of equine minimally invasive surgery.

scholarly journals Difficult Decisions in Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Thymus

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5887
Author(s):  
Ankit Dhamija ◽  
Jahnavi Kakuturu ◽  
J. W. Awori Hayanga ◽  
Alper Toker
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Myasthenia Gravis ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Prognostic Importance

A minimally invasive resection of thymomas has been accepted as standard of care in the last decade for early stage thymomas. This is somewhat controversial in terms of higher-staged thymomas and myasthenia gravis patients due to the prognostic importance of complete resections and the indolent characteristics of the disease process. Despite concerted efforts to standardize minimally invasive approaches, there is still controversy as to the extent of excision, approach of surgery, and the platform utilized. In this article, we aim to provide our surgical perspective of thymic resection and a review of the existing literature.

Patient choice and the history of minimally invasive surgery

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 388 (10052) ◽  
pp. 1369-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Schlich ◽  
Cynthia L Tang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
History Of

scholarly journals Minimally invasive surgery in thymic malignances: the new standard of care

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (S14) ◽  
pp. S1666-S1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuefei Zhang ◽  
◽  
Zhitao Gu ◽  
Wentao Fang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Standard Of Care

scholarly journals Implementing complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer – mission completed?

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland S. Croner ◽  
Henry Ptok ◽  
Susanne Merkel ◽  
Werner Hohenberger
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Complete Mesocolic Excision ◽  
Oncological Outcome ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Mesocolic Excision ◽  
Related Survival

AbstractThe definition of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon carcinomas revolutionized the way of colon surgery. This technique conquered the world starting from Erlangen. Nevertheless, currently new developments especially in minimally invasive surgery challenge CME to become settled as a standard of care. To understand the evolution of CME, anatomical details occurring during embryogenesis and their variations have to be considered. This knowledge is indispensable to transfer CME from an open to a minimally invasive setting. Conventional surgery for colon cancer (non-CME) has a morbidity of 12.1–28.5% and a 3.7% mortality risk vs. 12–36.4% morbidity and 2.1–3% mortality for open CME. The morbidity of laparoscopic CME is between 4 and 31% with a mortality of 0.5–0.9%. In robotic assisted surgery, morbidity between 10 and 25% with a mortality of 1% was published. The cancer-related survival after 3 and 5 years for open CME is respectively 91.3–95% and 90% vs. 87% and 74% for non-CME. For laparoscopic CME the 3- and 5-year cancer-related survival is 87.8–97% and 79.5–80.2%. In stage UICC III the 3- and 5-year cancer-related survival is 83.9% and 80.8% in the Erlangen data of open technique vs. 75.4% and 65.5–71.7% for laparoscopic surgery. For stage UICC III the 3- and 5-year local tumor recurrence is 3.8%. The published data and the results from Erlangen demonstrate that CME is safe in experienced hands with no increased morbidity. It offers an obvious survival benefit for the patients which can be achieved solely by surgery. Teaching programs are needed for minimally invasive CME to facilitate this technique in the same quality compared to open surgery. Passing these challenges CME will become the standard of care for patients with colon carcinomas offering all benefits of minimally invasive surgery and oncological outcome.

scholarly journals An evidence-based review of enhanced recovery interventions in knee replacement surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 386-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
MS Ibrahim ◽  
S Alazzawi ◽  
I Nizam ◽  
FS Haddad
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Knee Replacement ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Healthcare Budget

Introduction Total knee replacement (TKR) is a very common surgical procedure. Improved pain management techniques, surgical practices and the introduction of novel interventions have enhanced the patient’s postoperative experience after TKR. Safe, efficient pathways are needed to address the increasing need for knee arthroplasty in the UK. Enhanced recovery programmes can help to reduce hospital stays following knee replacements while maintaining patient safety and satisfaction. This review outlines common evidence-based pre, intra and postoperative interventions in use in enhanced recovery protocols following TKR. Methods A thorough literature search of the electronic healthcare databases (MEDLINE®, Embase™ and the Cochrane Library) was conducted to identify articles and studies concerned with enhanced recovery and fast track pathways for TKR. Results A literature review revealed several non-operative and operative interventions that are effective in enhanced recovery following TKR including preoperative patient education, pre-emptive and local infiltration analgesia, preoperative nutrition, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic fields, perioperative rehabilitation, modern wound dressings, different standard surgical techniques, minimally invasive surgery and computer assisted surgery. Conclusions Enhanced recovery programmes require a multidisciplinary team of dedicated professionals, principally involving preoperative education, multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation; this will be boosted if combined with minimally invasive surgery. The current economic climate and restricted healthcare budget further necessitate brief hospitalisation while minimising costs. These non-operative interventions are the way forward to achieve such requirements.

Retrieval of retained Jamshidi needle fragments during minimally invasive surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 681-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
Spencer Block
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Spinal Fixation ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Surrounding Bone

As surgical techniques evolve, new intraoperative complications are prone to occur. With percutaneous spinal fixation, the control of implants and instruments can be a challenge when compared with open surgery, particularly if unintended instruments are retained or difficult to retrieve. In this report, the authors describe a case in which Jamshidi needle fragments broke within the vertebral body. Extraction of the fragments was accomplished using a small pedicle screw tap to first engage the retained metal and then to loosen the surrounding bone to allow retrieval and preservation of the anatomical structures needed to complete the intended operation. This technique may prove useful for the retrieval of deformable, cannulated metal pieces in minimally invasive surgery.

An integrated system of telemedicine for minimally invasive surgery

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 88-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Masero ◽  
F M Sanchez ◽  
J Uson
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Integrated Information System ◽  
Integrated Information

We have developed a telemedicine project called Telesurgex, which is an integrated information system designed for several hospitals as well as the Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre. The project researches and develops telemedicine systems (both hardware and software) and their contents, ensuring that they are really useful and not just a videoconference with medical topics. Another aim of the project is the improvement of teleteaching systems as applied to medicine, mainly teleteaching of minimally invasive surgical techniques.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Approaches in the Thoracic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Güntuğ Batıhan ◽  
Kenan Can Ceylan
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive Techniques ◽  
The Past ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Invasive Techniques

Minimally invasive techniques in thoracic surgery have made great progress over the past 20 years and are still evolving. Many surgical procedures performed with large thoracotomy incisions in the past can now be performed with much smaller incisions. With many studies, the advantages of minimally invasive surgery have been clearly seen, and thus its use has become widespread worldwide. Today, minimally invasive surgical methods have become the first choice in the diagnosis and treatment of lung, pleural and mediastinal pathologies. Minimally invasive approaches in thoracic surgery include many different techniques and applications. In this chapter, current minimally invasive techniques in thoracic surgery are discussed and important points are emphasized in the light of the current literature.

scholarly journals Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachit Shah ◽  
Nils-Tomas Delagar McBride
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Wedge Resection ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Current State ◽  
Chest Disease ◽  
History Of ◽  
Vats Wedge Resection

Over the last 25 years, improvement in instrumentation and surgical techniques has led to widespread adaptation of thoracoscopic (VATS) surgery in the field of thoracic oncology. What once was a niche operation like VATS wedge resection to now hybrid VATS chest wall resections, and advanced surgeries like bronchoplasty and sleeve resections are done with VATS. This has led to improved surgical outcomes for our patients and increased use of surgery in the treatment of chest disease. We review the history of VATS and its current state with most recent changes and upgrades in the technique in this chapter. We review the advancement in uniportal VATS, robotic assisted resection, complex VATS resection, and awake lung surgery with VATS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document