scholarly journals Comparative Effects of Single Shot Intrathecal Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine with Fentanyl on Labor Outcome

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fyneface-Ogan ◽  
O. Gogo Job ◽  
C. E. Enyindah
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Stress Hormones ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Labor Pain ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Multiparous Women ◽  
Beta Endorphins

Background. Effective intrapartum analgesia attenuates pain, stress, and anxiety which cause release of stress hormones as well as beta-endorphins. Aim. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to hyperbaric bupivacaine for neuraxial analgesia for labor. Methods. Ninety laboring multiparous women were allocated to have single shot intrathecal bupivacaine alone (B), bupivacaine with fentanyl (BF), or bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine (BD). Sensory and motor block characteristics; time from injection to two dermatome sensory regression, sensory regression to S1 dermatome, and motor block regression to Bromage 1 were recorded. Labor pain was assessed with a 10 cm verbal pain scale. Results. Peak sensory block levels in the three groups were essentially the same (). The time for sensory and motor blocks to reach T10 dermatome and Bromage 1, respectively, was faster in group BD than in the other groups (). The time for sensory regression to S1 was significantly prolonged in the group BD (). Motor block regression time to Bromage 1 was also prolonged in the group BD (). Neonatal outcome was normal in all groups. Conclusion. Single shot intrathecal bupivacaine/dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged sensory block in laboring women.

scholarly journals Comparison of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Butorphanol as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% in Infraumbilical Surgeries- A Randomised Double Blind Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Roy Basunia ◽  
Prosenjit Mukherjee ◽  
Md Bakir Hossain Munshi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Neuraxial opioids are widely used as adjuvants to local anaesthetic as they improve quality and duration of block. Neuraxial opioids like Butorphanol and Fentanyl allow prolonged analgesia in the postoperative period and faster recovery from spinal anaesthesia. Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of Butorphanol and Fentanyl combined with bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomised controlled trial in which 110, ASA I and II patients of either sex who underwent elective infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were selected. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups A (n=55) and B (n=55). Group A (F) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with fentanyl 25 microgram (0.5 mL) to make it total 3.5 mL. Group B (B) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with butorphanol 250 microgram (0.25 mL) and Normal Saline (NS) 0.25 mL to make it total 3.5 mL. Heart Rate (HR), Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP, DBP), two segment regression time of sensory block, motor block were assessed at preset intervals. Chi-square test or Fischer’s-exact test were used and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Mean of two segment sensory regression time of Group A was 41.94±1.73 minutes and Group B was 50.56±4.43 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to onset of motor block in Group A was 5.28±.32 minutes and Group B was 5.27±.32 minutes (p=0.96). Mean duration of motor block in Group A was 81.23±4.87 minutes and Group B was 109.83±2.61 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to rescue analgesic was 289.27±7.37 minutes in Group A and 378.41±10.25 minutes in Group B (p<0.0001). HR, SBP and DBP were comparable among the groups. Conclusion: Intrathecal bupivacaine-butorphanol mixture was clinically better as it provided longer duration of analgesia with lesser incidences of pruritus and nausea/vomiting compared to intrathecal fentanyl-bupivacaine mixture.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS NALBUPHINE AS INTRATHECAL ADJUVANTS TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE DURING LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES – A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND INTERVENTIONAL STUDY.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trishala Jain ◽  
Jaipal .
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Institutional Ethics ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Background: Regional anesthesia techniques for gynecological procedures are on increasing trends due to their advantage of postoperative analgesia owing to intrathecal adjuvants. The present study was aimed to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy of clonidine with nalbuphine when co-administered intrathecally with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for Lower abdominal surgeries in Gynecology. Methods: With institutional ethics committee clearance No. 193MC/EC/2018, randomized, double blind study was conducted. After obtaining informed written consent total of 84 patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n=42) - Inj.  3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% + 0.2 ml Clonidine(30µg) intrathecally.  Group B (n=42) - Inj.3.5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5%+0.2 ml Nalbuphine(2mg) intrathecally. The characteristics of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic data, side effects were recorded. Results: The onset of sensory block was earlier in Group B than Group A (3.08±0.52 min vs 4.00±0.54 min, p<0.001 ). The onset of motor block was also earlier in Group B than Group A (7.78±0.80 min vs 8.80±0.95min, p<0.001). The time to first rescue analgesia in patients receiving intrathecal clonidine was significantly delayed than patients receiving intrathecal nalbuphine (284.95 ± 12.93 min vs 211.52 ± 15.92 min, p<0.001). Introperative hemodynamic changes were comparable and none of the patient suffered from respiratory depression except very little cases of shivering which are not significant. Conclusions: Intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine provided was clinically more effective than nalbuphine for prolonging the duration of analgesia for gynecological procedures. Keywords: Bupivacaine, Clonidine, Lower abdominal surgeries in gynecology, Nalbuphine, Subarachnoid block.

scholarly journals Comparison between isobaric levobupivacaine 0.5% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgeries and lower abdominal surgeries in adult patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Preeti Parashar ◽  
Anisha Singh ◽  
Manoj Kumar Sharma ◽  
Dipak L. Raval
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

 Background: The aim of our study was to compare sensory and motor block characteristics and hemodynamic changes following intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) and isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) in elective lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries.Methods: 60 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, ASA grade I or II scheduled for elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were randomized into two groups, group B (n=30) and group L (n=30) and received either 3 ml of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine or isobaric levobupivacaine intrathecally.Results: The mean time of onset of sensory block at shin of tibia in both the groups was comparable i.e. levobupivacaine (1.19±0.2 minutes) and bupivacaine (1.1+0.2 minutes). The mean time for total duration of sensory block was 211.1±8.2 minutes in group L, while 193.13±13.7 minutes in group B. Time for total duration of motor block in group L was 198.76±8.428 minutes and in group B was 182.6±13.989 minutes. Statistically significant difference was observed in total duration of sensory and motor block in both levobupivaciane and bupivacaine group (p<0.0001). Patients in group L were hemodynamically more stable with significantly less decrease in pulse rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure as compared to group B.Conclusions: We observed that 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine provided better hemodynamic stability, longer duration of sensory and motor block as compared to bupivacaine. 

scholarly journals Comparison of effects of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine in patients undergoing elective Caesarean section

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 859-863
Author(s):  
Sangeeta Subba ◽  
Arjun Arjun Chhetri ◽  
Rupak Bhattarai
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia is considered a reasonable choice for cesarean section. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine have been used as intrathecal drugs alone or in combination with various opioids. Ropivacaine is considered a valid and safe alternative to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric ropivacaine with hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Methodology: Sixty pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section were allocated into two groups. Group R received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine (2 ml 0.75% plain ropivacaine mixed with 1 ml of 25 %dextrose) and Group B received 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Both the groups were compared in terms of onset of sensory and motor block, regression of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia and side effects. Results: The onset of sensory block was comparable in both groups but was statistically insignificant. The onset of motor block in Bupivacaine(7.53 ± 1.72) min was faster when compared to Ropivacaine group(14.33 ± 6.19) min. Regression of sensory and motor block both were faster in Ropivacaine group. Duration of analgesia was longer in Bupivacaine group(131.17 ± 32.95)min than Ropivacaine group(125.33 ± 30.54)min. Conclusion: Ropivacaine can be used as an alternative to Bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section but has a shorter duration of sensory and motor block.

A COMPARISON BETWEEN INTRATHECAL NALBUPHINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS AN ADJUVANT WITH 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER SEGMENT CESAREAN SECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Choudhary ◽  
Neeti Mahla
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthesia for cesarean section, being simple to perform and economical with rapid onset. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesia of intrathecal nalbuphine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in cesarean section. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double?blind, and comparative study was conducted on 120 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II. These patients were randomized into three groups with fifty patients in each group. Group A received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg), Group B received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml fentanyl (20 ?g), and Group B received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) plus 0.4 ml of normal saline. Results: The mean duration of sensory block was 107.32 ± 5.36 min in Group A, 111.23 ± 4.23 min in Group B, and 85.69 ± 2.31 min in Group C. The mean duration of motor block (time required for motor block to return to Bromage’s Grade 1 from the time of onset of motor block) was 152.02 ± 3.12 min in Group A, 151.69± 2.36 min in Group B, and 122.12 ± 2.32 min in Group C. Conclusion: We concluded that intrathecal nalbuphine prolongs postoperative analgesia maximally and may be used as an alternative to intrathecal fentanyl in cesarean section. Keywords: Nalbuphine, Bupivacaine, Fentanyl.

scholarly journals Comparison between intrathecal bupivacaine and combination of bupivacaine and midazolam for postoperative pain relief after infraumbilical elective surgeries

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4031
Author(s):  
Neha Sharma ◽  
Chetan Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Sample Size Calculation ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hemodynamic Changes ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
To Receive

Background: Objective of the study was to identify the efficacy of midazolam as an adjuvant to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, a prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted to compare the onset, duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic changes and complications.Methods: Sixty patients, ASA I/II, Age 18-60 year, scheduled for infraumbilical surgeries, were randomly allocated to group BNS(n=30) to receive intrathecally 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.4 ml normal saline; and group BM (n=30) to receive 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine +2 mg preservative free midazolam 0.4 ml (5mg/ml). We observed onset, duration and regression of sensory and motor block, degree of sedation and pain scores, hemodynamic changes and adverse effects. (PS) version 3.0.0.34 was used for power and sample size calculation. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft (MS) office excel software with the student’s t-test and chi-square test (P=0.05)Results: Highest level of sensory blockade (p<.05), motor block duration (179.67±14.94 vs 151.83±10.96 min), sensory block duration (222±16.5 vs 174±12.53 min) and time to first requirement of i.v. analgesia were significantly higher in group BM. Postoperative VAS score was significantly less in group BM. Both groups were comparable in demographic data and hemodynamic changes.Conclusions: Intrathecal 2 mg midazolam found as an attractive adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in infraumbilical surgeries by producing significantly longer duration of motor and sensory block, good quality of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia with less incidence of nausea vomiting as compared to bupivacaine alone. 

scholarly journals Influence of injection rate of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% on spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients with lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. A randomized controlled trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (08) ◽  
pp. 1251-1255
Author(s):  
Manzoor Ahmed Faridi (Retd) ◽  
Shaheen Mahmood ◽  
Muhammad Safi ur Rehman
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

To determine the effect of speed of hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.75%) injection on clinical characteristics of spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Setting: This study was conducted in the operating theatre of Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi. Period: August 2018 - March 2019. Materials and Methods: 60 elderly patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery were randomized into two groups based on injection rate (fast and slow). 1.5 ml of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected over 5 seconds (fast group) and 50 seconds (slow group). Study was undertaken after taking permission from institutional ethical review committee. Level of sensory block, motor block, and systolic blood pressure were recorded at pre-specified intervals. Incidences of hypotensive episode, nausea, phenylephrine and antiemetic use were also documented. Results: Our study did not reveal any difference in maximum level of sensory block attained (fast = median T4, interquartile range [T4–T6] vs slow = T4 [T4–T6], P = 0.77). There was no difference in mean time (minutes) to reach T10 sensory level (fast = 2.5 ± 1.2 vs slow = 2.2 ± 0.8, P = 0.27); maximum sensory level (fast = 4.2 ± 1.5 vs slow = 3.8 ± 1.2, P = 0.26) and maximum motor block level (min) (fast = 5.9 ± 1.4 vs slow = 5.7 ± 1.2, P = 0.56). The rate of hypotension (fast = 8/30 vs slow = 4/30, P = 0.33), nausea (fast = 5/30 vs slow = 3/30, P = 0.99) and phenylephrine use (fast = 5/30 vs slow = 3/30, P = 0.71) and antiemetic requirement (fast = 1/30 vs slow = 2/30, P = 0.99) was also alike. Conclusion: There is no effect of injection speed of intrathecal (0.75%) bupivacaine on the clinical features of spinal anaesthesia in older patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.

scholarly journals Sensory Block Level Prediction of Spinal Anaesthesia With 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Yin Huang ◽  
Kuang-Yi Chang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Block Height ◽  
Block Level

Abstract There is still no consensus on how to determine the dose of spinal anaesthesia with adequate sensory block for a planned surgery. This retrospective study aimed to explore the associations of miscellaneous factors with peak sensory block level after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine, and to construct a predictive model for single-shot spinal anaesthesia. We collected the records of 401 non-pregnant adults who underwent spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine at the L3-4 or L4-5 intervertebral space for lower body surgeries. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to investigate predictors of the block level and build up the predictive model. Five variables were identified as independent predictors of the peak sensory block level, including bupivacaine dose, height, weight, gender and age. The predictive model for peak block level after spinal anaesthesia could be expressed as a formula with these five variables and the estimated predictive power was 0.72. Based on this model, it is possible to determine a reasonable dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia, which gives adequate sensory block required for diverse surgical procedures in various patients and could be considered as a dose reference for sensory block height in spinal anaesthesia.

UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR LOWER EXTREMITY SURGERY

2014 ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Van Long Le ◽  
Van Minh Nguyen ◽  
Kha Canh Ho
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Orthopedic Procedures ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Bilateral Group ◽  
Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Unilateral Group

Objective: To compare the efficacy of unilateral spinal anesthesia by heavy bupivacaine with conventional bilateral anesthesia for lower extremity surgery. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, eighty two patients undergoing elective lower extremity orthopedic surgery were randomly allocated into two groups, unilateral and bilateral. All patients received intrathecally 8 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% over 40 seconds at the L3-4 intervertebral space. A lateral decubitus position after spinal injection was maintained in the unilateral group for 15 min. The onset and recovery of sensory and motor block and perioperative side effects were recorded. Results: Success rate of unilateral anesthesia was 82.9%. In the unilateral group, the sensory block for surgery (above L1) (181.5 ± 18.9 versus 150.0 ± 20.1 min), motor block time (149.3 ± 18.4 versus 121.5 ± 16.4 min) were longer and incidence of hypotension (2.4 versus 29.3%) was lower than those in the bilateral group. Onset of sensory block (3.5 ± 1.1 versus 3.3 ± 0.9 min), succes rate of anesthesia (100% in both groups), incidences of intraoperative nausea, vomiting and agitation and postoperative nausea, vomiting, headache and heart rate, respiratory changes were not significant between two groups. Conclusion: Unilateral spinal anesthesia provided longer sensory and motor block, lower incidence of hypotention in comparison with conventional bilateral anesthesia. This is a suitable technique for lower limb orthopedic procedures. Key words: Unilateral spinal anesthesia, lower extremity surgery

scholarly journals Effects of Adding Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Saddle Spinal Block in Adults Undergoing Peri-anal Surgeries

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Gautam ◽  
Sushila Moktan Lama ◽  
Mona Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Saddle spinal block is the first choice anesthetic technique for adults undergoing peri-anal surgeries. It prevents unnecessary high levels of analgesia and sympathetic block. However, it may not provide prolonged analgesia. This study aims to investigate analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine when added to hyperbaric bupivacaine in saddle spinal block.Methods: Fifty otherwise healthy adults scheduled for uncomplicated peri-anal surgery were randomly allocated into two equal groups in this double-blinded study. Group A received hyperbaric bupivacaine five milligrams; group B received hyperbaric bupivacaine five milligrams plus dexmedetomidine five micrograms intrathecally. Patients remained seated for ten minutes. Time to first analgesic request by patients was the primary end point. Onset and extent of sensory block, and, magnitude and duration of motor block were assessed. Post-operative analgesic consumption and side effects were studied for 24 hours. Student’s t-test for quantitative variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables were used for statistical analysis.Results: Patients in group B had a significantly prolonged duration of analgesia (group B, 501 ± 306 minutes; group A, 284 ± 58 minutes) and significantly reduced analgesic requirement than patients in group A. Sensory block in first sacral dermatome appeared significantly earlier in group B. Peak sensory block, magnitude of motor block, and side effects were not significantly different between groups A and B.Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine as an intrathecal adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in saddle spinal block prolongs duration of analgesia and decreases analgesic requirement with no added side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document