scholarly journals The Use of Postoperative Restraints in Children after Cleft Lip or Cleft Palate Repair: A Preliminary Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Huth ◽  
J. Dayne Petersen ◽  
James A. Lehman
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Suture Line ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Purpose. This study examines whether the use of elbow restraints after cleft lip/palate repair has a relationship to postoperative complications. Methods. A comparative descriptive design was used to study a convenience sample of children undergoing repair of cleft lip/palate at Akron Children’s Hospital with Institutional Review Board approval. The children were randomized into intervention or control groups with use of elbow restraints considered the intervention. The study consists of two arms; one examined children after cleft lip repair, the second examined children after cleft palate repair. Repairs were performed by a single surgeon. Data collected included age, comorbidities, patient discomfort measured by pain score, frequency and duration of pain medications, use of pacifier or finger/thumb sucking, and postoperative complications including disruption of the suture line. Results. With 47 post palate repair patients and 47 post cleft repair patients, there is no significant difference () in the occurrence of postoperative complications. Conclusions. Study results provide prospective evidence to support postoperative observation of children by surgery staff and family following cleft lip or cleft palate repair without the use of elbow restraints. Clinicians should reevaluate the use of elbow restraints after cleft lip/palate repair based on the belief restraints prevent postoperative complications.

Impact of cleft palate repair on speech and development of dentoalveolar deformities

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
Yu.V. Stebeleva ◽  
◽  
Ad.A. Mamedov ◽  
Yu.O. Volkov ◽  
A.B. McLennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Normal Functioning ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Congenital Cleft ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Late Postoperative Period

Surgical repair of cleft palate is quite difficult because it aims not only to eliminate the anatomical defect of the palate, but also to ensure normal functioning, including speech. Moreover, successful surgery implies no or minimal deformation of the middle face that can be corrected in the late postoperative period. No doubt that primary surgery (both in terms of technique and time) is crucial for further growth and development of the maxilla. However, surgical techniques and the age of primary cleft palate repair vary between different clinics, which makes this literature review highly relevant. Key words: cleft palate repair, cleft palate, congenital cleft lip and palate

scholarly journals Corelation Of Parents’ Profiles Of Children With Late Cleft Repair In Surabaya Cleft Lip And Palate Centre (January 2015 – December 2017)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Laras Puspita Ningrum ◽  
Iswinarno Doso Saputro ◽  
Lobredia Zarasade
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Speech Disorders ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Background : Optimal time of  Cleft palate repair is during the 10 to 12  month of age. In this time produce far natural results in terms of speech because it enabled the maturation of scar tissue postoperatively. The soft palate must function properly before the patient starts learning to talk, otherwise speech disorders such as persistent rhinolalia aperta might arise. In pediatric patients, the role of parents is very important on adherence to therapy.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The first study group was parents of patients who had surgical repair before two years old and the second group was the parents of patients who had repair after two years old. We compared age, monthly income, education level, number of children, and residential distance from Surabaya of the two groups.Results : The data of this study were obtained from the medical records of patients with cleft lip surgery at CLP Center Surabaya in 2015th – 2017th with total of 358 patients, 172 were female and 186 were male. 52 patients with delayed cleft palate surgery. Patients’ parents in both groups were mostly 31-40 years old, were high school graduated, has one child, earned less than 1.5 million rupiah a month, and lived less than 100 kms from Surabaya. From the statistical results, parent’s income has the strongest correlation with the patient’s age in cleft palate surgery (-2.7). A negative coefficient means that the less parent’s income, the more patient likely had delayed cleft palate surgery. While other factors found weak and very weak correlations.Conclusions: The results form patient's parents' interview, concluded that besides economic factors, the lack of information cleft palate treatment is the key factors that contributed to the delay of cleft palate repair. The education level does not affect the delay in cleft palate surgery, because even in high educated parents, sometimes they don’t understand the stages of cleft lip and palate treatment. This study emphasized the necessity to educate about the stages of surgery by primary care physicians, to minimize delays.

Improved Early Cleft Lip and Palate Complications at a Surgery Specialty Center in the Developing World

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1145-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Park ◽  
Gaurav Deshpande ◽  
Bjorn Schonmeyr ◽  
Carolina Restrepo ◽  
Alex Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Developing World ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Surgical Mission ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective: To evaluate complication rates following cleft lip and cleft palate repairs during the transition from mission-based care to center-based care in a developing region. Patients and Design: We performed a retrospective review of 3419 patients who underwent cleft lip repair and 1728 patients who underwent cleft palate repair in Guwahati, India between December 2010 and February 2014. Of those who underwent cleft lip repair, 654 were treated during a surgical mission and 2765 were treated at a permanent center. Of those who underwent cleft palate repair, 236 were treated during a surgical mission and 1491 were treated at a permanent center. Setting: Two large surgical missions to Guwahati, India, and the Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center (GCCCC) in Assam, India. Main Outcome Measure: Overall complication rates following cleft lip and cleft palate repair. Results: Overall complication rates following cleft lip repair were 13.2% for the first mission, 6.7% for the second mission, and 4.0% at GCCCC. Overall complication rates following cleft palate repair were 28.0% for the first mission, 30.0% for the second mission, and 15.8% at GCCCC. Complication rates following cleft palate repair by the subset of surgeons permanently based at GCCCC (7.2%) were lower than visiting surgeons ( P < .05). Conclusions: Our findings support the notion that transitioning from a mission-based model to a permanent facility-based model of cleft care delivery in the developing world can lead to decreased complication rates.

Association Between Palatal Index and Cleft Palate Repair Outcomes in Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Percy Rossell-Perry ◽  
Evelyn Caceres Nano ◽  
Arquímedes M. Gavino-Gutierrez
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Tympanoplasty Results in Patients with Cleft Palate: An Age- and Procedure-Matched Comparison of Preliminary Results with Patients without Cleft Palate

2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Gardner ◽  
John L. Dornhoffer
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Otologic Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Matched Comparison ◽  
And Control ◽  
Palate Patient

OBJECTIVE: Because of continued eustachian tube abnormalities, the presence of a cleft palate repair has been thought to be associated with poor outcomes after tympanoplastic surgery. However, little published data exist regarding the results of major otologic surgery in patients with cleft palate. The objective of this study was to review our results of otologic surgery in these patients and compare results with those of age- and procedure-matched controls. METHODS: Our otologic database was used to identify patients with a repaired cleft palate who underwent otologic surgery between March 1994 and December 1999. Two control patients were identified for each cleft palate patient. Results of hearing, graft take, and need for postoperative pressure-equalizing tubes were compared. RESULTS: No significant difference existed between patients with a repaired cleft palate and control patients with regard to postoperative air-bone gap ( P = 0.6805), graft survival rate ( P = 1.00), and need for postoperative intubation ( P = 0.457). CONCLUSION: Results in patients with cleft palate appear to be similar to those in patients without cleft palate.

scholarly journals Speech Outcome Evaluation After Two-Flap Palatoplasty In Plastic Surgery Division Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital: A Retrospective study

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristaninta Bangun ◽  
Siti Handayani ◽  
Intania Djoenaedi ◽  
Luh Karunia Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Speech Pathologist ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Larger Sample ◽  
Normal Speech

One of the primary goal of cleft palate repair is to provide an intact mechanism for normal speech production. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the two-flap mucoperiosteal palatoplasty procedure on speech outcomes in patients undergoing surgical repair before the age of 2 years. A retrospective analysis study was done on 22 children with complete unilateral cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) who underwent two-flap palatoplasty between year 2002 to 2006 at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Evaluation was performed by a speech pathologist for pattern of articulation, hypernasality, intelligibility, and velopharyngeal competence. Palatoplasty were performed after 2 year-old in 11 patients and before 2 year-old in 11 patients. Speech of the 22 children postpalatoplasty was evaluated perceptually from standardised tape recordings. Velopharyngeal competence in patients who underwent palatoplasty before 2 year-old compared to after 2 year-old were 72.7% good, 18.2% fair and 9.1% poor versus 54,5% good, 9,1% fair and 36,4% poor respectively. Two-flaps mucoperiosteal palatoplasty performed before the age of 2 years old shows better spepolech outcome in all parameters, although the numbers are not statistically significant. Further prospective study with larger sample is needed.

Dentoalveolar Arch Dimensions in UCLP Boys After Neonatal Cheiloplasty or After Lip Surgery at the Age of 3 or 6 Months

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1020-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Kotova ◽  
Wanda Urbanova ◽  
Andrej Sukop ◽  
Renata Peterkova ◽  
Miroslav Peterka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Deciduous Molars ◽  
Plaster Casts

Objective: To compare the influence of 3 different time protocols of cleft lip and palate operations on the growth of the dentoalveolar arch in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Materials and Methods: We evaluated 64 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys with UCLP operated on according to 3 different time protocols: lip repair at the age of 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, lip repair at 3 months and palate repair at 9 months, and neonatal lip repair and palate repair at 9 months. The control group contained 13 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys. The dentoalveolar arch width was measured between deciduous canines and between the second deciduous molars; the length was measured between incisive papilla and the line connecting both tuber maxillae. Results: All measured distances were statistically significantly smaller in boys with UCLP than in the control group. Intercanine width was not statistically significantly different between the patients operated on according to the different time protocols. In comparison to the lip repair at 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, the intermolar width was statistically significantly smaller in the group with neonatal lip repair; the alveolar arch length was statistically significantly shorter in both groups with lip repair performed neonatally or at 3 months. Conclusions: The length of the dentoalveolar arch is shorter after surgical repair of cleft lip neonatally or at the age of 3 months. Cleft palate repair at 9 months can contribute to a reduction in the width of the dentoalveolar arch.

scholarly journals Velopharyngeal Closure and Resonance in Children Following Early Cleft Palate Repair: Outcome Measurement

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (02) ◽  
pp. 201-208
Author(s):  
V. S. Aparna ◽  
M. Pushpavathi ◽  
Krishnamurty Bonanthaya
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Air Emission ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Speech Assessment

Abstract Introduction Timing of cleft palate repair and the method of speech outcome measurement in children with cleft lip and palate are much debated topics. The associated problems and quality of life in these children depend on the timing of the surgery. Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the velopharyngeal (VP) function and resonance parameters in children following early cleft palate repair. Method A total of 25 Kannada-speaking children with early repaired cleft palate were subjected to speech assessment and videofluoroscopic assessment. Perceptual speech parameters measured were severity of hypernasality and presence of nasal air emission. Videofluoroscopy was interpreted in terms of closure ratios to predict the severity of VP dysfunction. Results The analysis of videofluoroscopic images indicated that 48% of children had complete VP closure and 52% had perceptually normal resonance. A good correlation was found between the closure ratio and hypernasality. Conclusion Understanding the perceptual speech parameters and their structural correlates for outcome measurement will give better evidence for refining the existing treatment protocols. Data on a larger population are warranted for establishing predictors of optimum speech outcome.

Speech and Hearing Outcomes of the Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: Comparison between One-Stage Simultaneous and Two-Stage Surgical Repairs

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 1171-1177
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Common Belief ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Palatal Fistula ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Palate Repair

Background: Conventional treatment for cleft lip and palate patients is lip repair at three to four months and then palatal repair at nine to 12 months of age. However, for the patients who delay seeing a doctor especially in a developing area such as Northern Thailand, simultaneous lip and palate repair is performed at 12 to 18 months of age or later, depending on the age at the first visit. It is a common belief that patients with cleft lip and palate will be behind non-cleft patients in early development phonemes because of the open palate. This delay persists until the palate is repaired and on into the postoperative period. This proposition has not been proven with long-term clinical outcomes in one-stage repairs. Objective: To investigate the effects of one-stage repair on speech assessment, hearing, and incidence of palatal fistula. The results were compared with conventional two-stage surgical repairs. Materials and Methods: The present study was designed two groups. Group 1 consisted of 25 children (mean age 11.28±1.93 years) treated with a one-stage repair. Cleft lip, palate, and alveolus were repaired at a single surgical session in the first 18 months of life (mean age at the time of surgery 13.52±4.51 months). Group 2 consisted of 17 children (mean age 11.02±2.23 years) treated in two-stage surgical repairs. Lip repair was performed at a median age of 4.01 months (IQR 3.62 to 5.46), and palate repair was performed at a mean age of 13.54±4.14 months. Both groups underwent cleft lip and palate repairs at the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2010. Speech and hearing for all patients were evaluated by experienced ENT doctors. The palatal fistula was evaluated by the same plastic surgeons. Results: One-stage repair showed significant normal articulation and less articulation disorder when compared with two-stage surgical repairs. However, no significant difference was determined for other speech assessments, hearing, and incidence of palatal fistula. Conclusion: Because one-stage repair seems to have a more positive influence on articulation, and both surgical treatment protocols give similar results on speech assessments, hearing, and incidence of palatal fistula, regardless of the timing of the surgery, the one-stage repair is not inferior to conventional two-stage surgical repairs for patients in developing areas. This is due to several important advantages, such as less hospitalization, lower cost, and less chance of nosocomial infection. Keywords: One-stage repair, Speech, Hearing, Palatal fistula, Cleft lip, Palate

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document