scholarly journals Obtaining an accurate maternal blood pressure: A quality improvement initiative to improve nursing knowledge and confidence

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Matthew K. Wagar ◽  
Jacquelyn H. Adams ◽  
Amy Godecker ◽  
Kathleen Frigge ◽  
Michele Schroeder ◽  
...  

Background: Inaccurate assessment of maternal blood pressure (BP) contributes to misdiagnosis of hypertension, unnecessary or missed interventions, and maternal morbidity. This study examines obstetric nursing knowledge and confidence in proper assessment of maternal BP before and after an institutional quality improvement project.Methods: We implemented an online educational initiative in our women’s health unit based on the American Heart Association’s Blood Pressure Improvement Program. Simultaneously, a standard assessment of BP cuff sizing by arm measurement was implemented. We conducted a pre- and post-intervention assessment of nursing knowledge and confidence of BP measurement. Responses were analyzed using the χ2 test, two-sample t test, ordinary least squares and logistic regression.Results: A total of 145 nurses completed the pre- and 68 completed the post-intervention assessments. Participants answered 62% of pre- and 73% of post-intervention questions correctly (p < .001). Before implementation, 86.9% of participants reported feeling very or extremely confident in obtaining an accurate BP measurement, increasing to 98.5% following (p = .007). 73.8% of pre-intervention respondents reported feeling very or extremely confident in choosing an appropriate BP cuff compared to 96.3% post (p < .001). Following implementation, confidence levels were similar irrespective of years in practice, years of experience at our hospital, and primary nursing unit.Conclusions: A BP educational initiative and standardized BP cuff assessment increased nurses’ knowledge and confidence in selecting the correct cuff size and obtaining accurate readings. Increased knowledge and confidence may lead to greater adherence to standardized BP assessment during peripartum admission, more accurate BP measurements, and improved management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Author(s):  
Tsegaselassie Workalemahu ◽  
Mohammad L. Rahman ◽  
Marion Ouidir ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Cuilin Zhang ◽  
...  

Epidemiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S220
Author(s):  
Ellen M Wells ◽  
Carl P Verdon ◽  
Jeff Jarrett ◽  
Kathleen L Caldwell ◽  
Frank Witter ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed I Shahin ◽  
Ayman M Kamaly ◽  
Mohamed Saleh ◽  
Ashraf E El-Agamy

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia is the preferred method for elective cesarean sections (C.S.) due to considerable risks regarding airway management associated with physiological changes of pregnancy. Hypotension is reported to occur in up to 80% of spinal anesthesia cases. Many approaches have been investigated to prevent spinal hypotension, e.g., fluid loading, vasopressors, or both. Thus we compare the administration of intermittent I.V. boluses of norepinephrine and ephedrine to guard against the hypotensive effect of spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Patients and Methods 120 female patients undergoing electiveC.S.were randomly divided into “group-E” for Ephedrine and “group-N” for Norepinephrine. Results Compared with ephedrine, norepinephrine maintained maternal blood pressure and uterine artery blood flow. Further, it was associated with lower numbers of hypotension and hypertension episodes and less frequency of bradycardia and tachycardia during cesarean delivery. Conclusion Norepinephrine can be used as an alternative vasopressor to maintain maternal blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, with no adverse effect on neonatal outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document