Comparison of Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation with and without Capsular Tension Ring (CTR) Placement in Cataractous Dogs

2019 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Santosh Karebharamannavar ◽  
Ranganath Lingappa ◽  
B Nagaraja ◽  
Satyanarayana Mayasandra ◽  
Narayanaswamy Muniyappa
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Capsular Tension Ring

Outcomes of three surgical approaches for managing ectopia lentis in Marfan syndrome

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212199295
Author(s):  
Gurkan Erdogan ◽  
Nilay Kandemir Besek ◽  
Betul Onal Gunay ◽  
Alper Agca
Keyword(s):  
Marfan Syndrome ◽  
Crystalline Lens ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
Ectopia Lentis ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Capsular Tension Ring ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective: To investigate the clinical outcomes of three surgical approaches for ectopia lentis in Marfan syndrome (MS) patients who had undergone crystalline lens removal with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation techniques comprising the intrascleral fixation of IOL, sutured scleral fixation of IOL, and IOL implantation with the use of a Cionni capsular tension ring (CTR). Methods: This is a retrospective comparative study, including 35 eyes of 21 patients who underwent the intrascleral fixation of IOL (group 1), scleral IOL fixation with the Z-suture (group 2), and IOL implantation with the use of a Cionni CTR (group 3) following crystalline lens removal. The surgical indications were as follows: no improvement in visual function after eyeglasses or contact lens application due to excessive irregular astigmatism and advanced crystalline lens decentration in which the edge of the crystalline lens came up to the optical axis, or dislocation of the crystalline lens resulting in aphakia and secondary glaucoma due to lens dislocation. The surgical outcomes and complications due to surgery were compared between the groups. Results: The mean age of the patients in the study was 12.3 ± 8.7 years (5–32 years). There were 10 eyes in group 1, 13 eyes in group 2, and 12 eyes in group 3. Visual acuity improved significantly in each group after surgery. Ocular residual astigmatism did not differ significantly between the groups ( p = 0.51). Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the three surgical approaches in the current study in terms of the postoperative results and complications.

scholarly journals Pupil Dilation with Intracameral Epinephrine Hydrochloride during Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
A-Yong Yu ◽  
Hua Guo ◽  
Qin-Mei Wang ◽  
Fang-Jun Bao ◽  
Jing-Hai Huang
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Pupil Diameter ◽  
Pupil Dilation ◽  
Surgical Performance ◽  
Corneal Incision ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Time Point

Objective. To investigate mydriatic effect of intracamerally injected epinephrine hydrochloride during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.Methods. Eighteen cataract patients for bilateral phacoemulsification were enrolled. To dilate pupil, one eye was randomly selected to receive intracamerally 1 mL epinephrine hydrochloride 0.001% for 1 minute after corneal incision (intracameral group), and the contralateral eye received 3 drops of compound tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 0.5% at 5-minute intervals 30 minutes before surgery (topical group). Pupil diameters were measured before corneal incision, before ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) injection, after OVD injection, before IOL implantation, and at the end of surgery.Results. At each time point, the mean pupil diameter in the intracameral group was2.20±0.08,5.09±0.20,6.76±0.19,6.48±0.18, and5.97±0.24 mm, respectively, and in the topical group it was7.98±0.15,7.98±0.15,8.53±0.14,8.27±0.16, and7.93±0.20 mm, respectively. The topical group consistently had larger mydriatic effects than the intracameral group (P<0.05). The onset of mydriatic effect was rapid in the intracameral group. There was no difference in surgical performance or other parameters between groups.Conclusions. Intracameral epinephrine hydrochloride appears to be an alternative to the mydriatic modalities for phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. In comparison with topical mydriatics, intracameral epinephrine hydrochloride offers easier preoperative preparation, more rapid pupil dilation, and comparable surgical performance.

scholarly journals Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayoung Choi ◽  
Hyunggoo Kwon ◽  
Sohee Jeon
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Axial Length ◽  
Mean Absolute Error ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Fort Worth ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Multifocal Iol ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Study Population

AbstractThe accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is suboptimal for long or short eyes, which results in a low visual quality after multifocal IOL implantation. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of IOL formulas (Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) for the Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States) implantation based on the axial length (AXL) from a large cohort of 2018 cases and identify the factors that are associated with a high mean absolute error (MAE). The Barrett Universal II showed the lowest MAE in the normal AXL group (0.30 ± 0.23), whereas the Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q showed the lowest MAE in the short AXL group (0.32 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.21 D, respectively). The Haigis showed the lowest MAE in the long AXL group (0.24 ± 0.19 D). The Barrett Universal II did not perform well in short AXL eyes with higher astigmatism (P = 0.013), wider white-to-white (WTW; P < 0.001), and shorter AXL (P = 0.016). Study results suggest that the Barrett Universal II performed best for the TFNT IOL in the overall study population, except for the eyes with short AXL, particularly when the eyes had higher astigmatism, wider WTW, and shorter AXL.

scholarly journals Anterior Capsule Opening Contraction and Late Intraocular Lens Dislocation after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Weak or Partially Absent Zonular Support

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Juris Vanags ◽  
Renārs Erts ◽  
Guna Laganovska
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum Garnet ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Anterior Capsule ◽  
Capsular Tension Ring ◽  
Hydrophobic Acrylic ◽  
Capsular Bag

Background and objectives: To evaluate anterior capsule opening (ACO) contraction and late intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation after cataract surgery in patients with weak or partially absent zonular support and assess methods of reducing these complications. Materials and methods: For this prospective study, we enlisted cataract surgery patients in our hospital with preoperative diagnoses of weak zonules. All patients received phacoemulsification surgery with implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic IOL and capsular tension ring (CTR). ACO reductions were measured for six months after enrolment. Data on late IOL dislocations were collected five years after enrolment of the last patient. Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled from 2011 to 2015. Over the six-month active follow-up period, ACO area reduction was 23% in patients receiving CTRs of 11 mm diameter and 8% for patients with CTRs of 12 mm, with an overall mean of 15% reduction. Five years after the last patient was enrolled, seven patients (13%) had experienced late IOL-CTR-capsular bag dislocation. For these patients, the mean ACO reduction in the first six months of follow-up was 33%, including for those who had received neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) anterior capsulotomies. Conclusion: Use of hydrophobic acrylic lenses and CTR reduces ACO contraction, with rates comparable to those after cataract surgery without ocular comorbidity. Our patients experienced a relatively high rate of late IOL-CTR-capsular bag dislocation. However, dislocated complexes were easily repositioned and few patients required IOL exchange. Frequent visits are warranted to promptly detect late complications of cataract surgery in patients with weak zonular support.

scholarly journals Clinical differences between toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation when myopia is determined as target refraction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da young Shin ◽  
Ho Sik Hwang ◽  
Hyun Seung Kim ◽  
Man Soo Kim ◽  
Eun Chul Kim
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Corneal Astigmatism ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Monofocal Iol ◽  
Target Refraction ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Background: To analyze and compare the clinical results of toric intraocular lens (IOL) and monofocal IOL implantation when the target refraction value is determined -3 diopter (D) in cataract patients with corneal astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D).Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients with corneal astigmatism >1.5D who underwent cataract surgery and their target refraction is determined -3D. 100 eyes (100 patients; monofocal IOL, 60; toric IOL, 40) were enrolled in the current study. Near and distant uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected VA, spherical equivalent and refractive, corneal astigmatism were evaluated before and after surgery.Results: The near UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.26±0.33) after cataract surgery was significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.48±0.32) (p=0.030). The distant UCVA of the toric IOL group (0.38 ± 0.14) was also significantly better than that of the monofocal IOL group (0.55 ± 0.22) (p = 0.026). There were no significant intergroup differences in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.710) and mean spherical equivalent (p = 0.465). In the toric IOL group, postoperative refractive astigmatism was -0.80 ± 0.46D and postoperative corneal astigmatism was -1.50 ± 0.62D, whereas the corresponding values in the monofocal IOL group were -1.65 ± 0.77D and -1.45 ± 0.64D; residual refractive astigmatism was significantly lower with toric IOL implantation compared with monofocal IOL implantation (p = 0.001). Conclusions: When myopic refraction such as -3D was determined as the target power in patients with corneal astigmatism, toric IOL implantation led to excellent improvement in both near and distant UCVA.

scholarly journals Repeated intraocular lens dislocation followed by haptic deformation and loss of tension: a case report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
xinqi ma ◽  
ming zhou ◽  
jiajie wen ◽  
yujia ouyang ◽  
chongde long
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Optical Surface ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Lens Dislocation ◽  
Intraocular Lens Dislocation ◽  
Satisfactory Outcome ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
Eye Examination ◽  
Iol Dislocation

Abstract Background: Intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation is a rare but serious postoperative complication of intraocular lens implantation, so far, there is no report describing late intraocular lens dislocation caused by a deformed haptic piercing through the iris. Case report: A 29-year-old male developed IOL dislocation one and a half years after IOL implantation in his right eye. The eye examination showed that haptic pierced the iris at 10 o'clock in his right eye, according to intraoperative exploration, the haptic was deformed and became less elastic, the patient underwent the surgery of IOL reposition for various factors, but finally did not achieve a satisfactory outcome. Conclusion: Late IOL dislocation followed by haptic deformation is difficult to detect unless there are serious complications. When the position of IOL haptics is not in a plane with its optical surface, it should be highly vigilant that the function of the haptics may be abnormal. IOL replacement should be performed as soon as possible for the IOL dislocation caused by the loss of haptic tension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document