scholarly journals T. Iwatake: Japanese Military Administration in Southeast Asia

1990 ◽  
pp. 105-108
Author(s):  
K. Ichikawa
Author(s):  
Redactie KITLV

- F.D.K. Bosch, J. Boisselier, Manuel d’ archéologie d’ Extrême-Orient. Première Partie: Asie du Sud-Est I. Le Cambodge. Sous la direction de G. Coedès. J. Picard et Cie., Paris, 1966. XVI and 480 pp., 72 figs., 64 pls., 4 plans and 2 maps. - H.J. de Graaf, Generale Missiven, van Gouverneurs-Generaal en Raden aan Heren XVII der Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie. Deel II: 1639-1655. Uitgegeven door Dr. W. Ph. Coolhaas. Martinus Nijhoff, ‘s-Gravenhage 1964. XIV en 870 blzz. - M.A.P. Meilink-Roelofsz, John Bastin, The British in West Sumatra, 1685-1825. A selection of documents with an introduction and notes. University of Malaya Press. Kuala Lumpur 1965. XLII, 209 p., ill., maps. - H.J. de Graaf, Nicholas Tarling, Southeast Asia; Past and present. F.W. Cheshire Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney 1966. 334 bladzijden, met 5 kaarten. - D. van Velden, Harry J. Benda, Japanese military administration in Indonesia: Selected documents. Translation Series No. 6. Southeast Asia Studies, Yale University. New Haven, 1965. XXVI, 279 pp., glossary., James K. Irikura, Koichi Kishi (eds.) - L. Sluimers, B. Dahm, Sukarnos Kampf um Indonesiens Unabhängigkeit: Werdegang und Ideen eines asiatischen Nationalisten. Band XVIII der Schriften des Instituts für Asienkunde. Alfred Metzner Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin 1966. XVI, 295 Seiten. - W.L. Idema, Maurice Freedman, Chinese lineage and society: Fukien and Kwantung. London School of Economics, Monographs on Social Anthropology No. 33; Athlone Press, London 1966. 207 pp., ills., krtn. - ,


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 125-161
Author(s):  
Michael Laffan

Abstract In this article I seek to make sense of the apparent contradiction of a call for jihad made under the auspices of the Japanese empire during its occupation of Java from March 1942 to September 1945. Why was Mas Mansur (1896–1946), the Indonesian religious figure and national hero who made the call, so supportive of the Japanese military administration? And why is this act so seldom remembered? As I hope to explain, Japan had already figured in the reformist Muslim imagination as a patriotic anti-western model for decades, creating a constituency that was initially open to Japanese overtures framed around mobilising national sentiment. Equally some Japanese advocates of southern expansion had thought about such framings while downplaying their preferred vision for a Greater East Asia that would not include an independent Indonesia. How this collaboration played out, with the Japanese eventually conceding ground on Islamic terms to gain national bodies, is a story worth retelling. In so doing I stress that Indonesia – lying at the intersection of pan-Islamic and pan-Asian imaginaries – should figure more prominently in global studies of Japanese policies regarding Islam in Asia or yet anti-Westernism in general.


1972 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 616
Author(s):  
John F. Cady ◽  
Frank Trager ◽  
Won Zoon Yoon ◽  
Thomas T. Winant ◽  
Ulrich Zagorski

1973 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
Gordon M. Berger ◽  
Frank N. Trager ◽  
Won Zoon Yoon ◽  
Thomas T. Winant

1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph B. Smith

For the greater part of the period from 1940 to 1945, French Indochina occupied a peculiar place in the Co-Prosperity Sphere of Great East Asia. Following the capitulation of France before the German army in June 1940, the northern part of Indochina became the first area in Southeast Asia to admit Japanese troops — at that stage, as an extension of the Japanese campaign in southern China. In July 1941 the Japanese advance into southern Indochina marked the first step towards a full-scale attack on European and American possessions in the whole region, which materialized in December 1941. But this military advance into Indochina, precisely because it took place before the general assault on Southeast Asia and the Pacific, had to be achieved by means of agreements and treaties with an established government. These were possible only because the French in Indochina decided to recognize the pro-German government at Vichy, so that the Japanese were able to apply diplomatic pressure both in France and at Hanoi. Once the agreements had been made, the Japanese saw no need to change the basis of their occupation of Indochina even after December 1941; they were by then preoccupied with establishing their presence in other areas. Consequently they continued to recognize the French administration in Indochina and to maintain diplomatic relations with it, so long as diplomatic pressure was sufficient to ensure that Japanese military needs were fully met.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-222

In the 20th century, the national liberation movement against imperialism and colonialism became a world-wide movement in many colonial countries (Smith, Anthony. 2010. pp. 9, 25–30). Each country-nation has mirrored in one way or another depending on historical and socio-political conditions, especially the leaders' way (Finlayson, Alan. 2014). Under British colonial rule, the nationalist movement in India was run under the leadership of patriotic and nationalistic leaders such as “a great soul” Mahatma Gandhi (McGregor, Ronald Stuart.1993, p.799) , Rash Behari Bose, Jawaharhlal Nehru, and “a respected leader” Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose (Gordon, Leonard A. 1990, pp. 459–460) ... Among them, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose has emerged as great leader. The paper consists of an introduction, = three sections and conclusion: 1. Vietnam and India both looked towards Japan in the early 20th century; 2. The support of the Japanese military to INA in struggle for national independence in India and Southeast Asia, and 3. Rethinking about the contributions of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose to India. The author tries to acknowledge the role of the military leader Netaji Subhas Chandra and his way of armed struggle through the Japanese military's support to INA in struggle for national independence in India and Southeast Asia. Received 15th December 2020; Revised 2nd March 2021; Accepted 20th March 2021


1995 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-103
Author(s):  
A. V. M. Horton

The small, oil-rich state of Brunei (population c. 40,000 in 1940) is situated in north-west Borneo. The ‘Abode of Peace’ became a British protectorate in 1888 and a Residential System along Malayan lines came into operation at the beginning of 1906. For most of the Second World War the country was under Japanese Military Administration, a period of three and a half years beginning in December 1941. Allied, predominantly Australian, landings took place in early June 1945 (Fahey 1992: 325–8; Monks 1992: 7–53) and the sultanate was speedily cleared of enemy forces, though not before the latter had successfully executed a scorched-earth programme. Most crucially of all, the Seria oilfield (discovered in 1929 by the Shell company) was set alight, the flames shooting ‘like giant blow-lamps’ at least thirty feet into the air. The last well fire was not extinguished until 27 September 1945 (Harper 1975: 21–4). A report in the Straits Times of 20 July 1946 gives some impression of the problems faced by the returning Western engineers:Most of the [Seria] wells were surrounded by blazing lakes, and the oil experts had to blast their way through. Because of the intense heat it was difficult to get near enough to ‘cap’ them and so seal the fires. In some cases aircraft were used, the fire-fighters advancing through the slipstream of the propellers which blew the flames and oil back. It then became possible to get near enough to thrust forward on long steel arms heavy charges of explosives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document