scholarly journals Comparison of Caries Occurence Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Pit and Fissure Sealants in Young Permanent Molars After One Year Application

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Nila Kasuma ◽  
M. Biomed ◽  
Aida Fitriana ◽  
Fildzah Nurul Fajrin
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
White Spot ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Icdas Ii ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The use of anatomic grooves or pits and fissures on the occlusal top of permanent grinders retains food scraps and increases the formation of caries. Inserting and fastening these exposed regions with pit-and fissure sealants has the potential to avert the occurrence of these injuries in teeth. The tools used for such process have the shape of a resin based and a glass ionomer cement (referred to as GIC hereafter). This study aims to compare white spot index (ICDAS) after applying resin based and fissure sealant glass ionomer, and to determine the more efficient types of material over a long period of time method. This study uses experimental pre-test and post-test methods. The research population consists of grade I, II, and III elementary students from the Elementary School No.2, Central Cupak, Padang. Samples were obtained through purposive sampling. The research involves 2 types of sample each of which consists of 30 children who were given resin based sealant application as well as glass Ionomer. ICDAS-II index was used to assess white spot index following one year application. The research data was analyzed with SPSS Statistics through unpaired t-test. The result shows that there is no major distinction between resin based sealant application and glass ionomer cement following one year application(p = 0,23). This study concludes that resin based sealants and glass ionomer cement constitute valuable pit and fissure sealant materials. The reaction of these materials must be evaluated over a longer period to determine the mean retention period and to confirm if a new application is needed.

scholarly journals Retention evaluation of two glass ionomer cement sealants: six-month clinical follow-up

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Alline FRAY ◽  
Thaís Manzano PARISOTTO ◽  
Gabriela Azevedo de Vasconcelos Cunha BONINI ◽  
Regina Maura Coli SIEGL ◽  
José Carlos Pettorossi IMPARATO
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Sealant Retention ◽  
First Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention of glass ionomer sealant, Vitro Molar(r) (DFL) and Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r) (3 m ESPE) as pit and fissure sealants on first permanent molars, fully or partially erupted. Methods: The study sample consisted of 412 molars, among 110 children. The sealant retention was evaluated after 6 months of the application. Results: The results were collected through digital photographs and the retention results were assessed by the following System: score 0 - total retention; score 1 - sealant present in more than 50% of the pit and fissure system; score 2 - sealant present in less than 50% of the pit and fissure system; score 3 - missing sealant. Regarding the presence of the sealants in less than 50% of the occlusal surface, lower percentages were found for the two materials used as follows: score score 2 - Vitro Molar(r) (9,52% examiner 1 and 11.9% examiner 2) and score 2 - Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r)(9.52% examiner 1 and 10.71% examiner 2). Approximately 90% of the teeth sealed with Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r)or Vitro Molar(r) presented total loss (score 3). Thus, there was no statistical difference between the materials and between the examiners (p>0.05). Conclusion: Therefore it was concluded that the sealant retention in the studied population was not satisfactory for any of the materials used.

scholarly journals Ameloplasty is counterproductive in reducing microleakage around Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Resin based fissure sealants

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tabinda Nawaz Khan ◽  
Farhan Raza Khan ◽  
Syed Yawar Ali Abidi
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
P Value ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer

Objective: To compare the microleakage around resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) based sealants and flowable resin based sealants placed with or without ameloplasty in extracted human teeth. Methods: This in-vitro experimental study was conducted at the Operative Dentistry Department, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan from June 2017 to December 2018. Sixty extracted human molars and premolars were assigned to four groups (n=15) each, according to the type of fissure sealant (flowable resin based sealant or resin modified glass ionomer based sealant) used and either placed with or without ameloplasty. Specimens were thermocycled and then immersed in 1% methylene blue for 24 hours. Specimens were then sectioned and examined using stereo-microscope (50X) for microleakage that was scored on an ordinal scale. Mann-Whitney U test and Ordinal regression were applied. Level of significance kept at 0.05. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (p-value <0.001) between the two sealant types for the microleakage scores. Sealants placed with ameloplasty demonstrated significantly higher microleakage values (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Microleakage was found to be more pronounced in RMGIC based sealants compared to the resin based sealants. Ameloplasty resulted in higher leakage around the sealants irrespective of the chemistry of material. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1268 How to cite this:Khan TN, Khan FR, Abidi SYA. Ameloplasty is counterproductive in reducing microleakage around Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Resin based fissure sealants. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1268 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Clinical Behavior of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Molars: A Comparative One-year Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Prabhaker ◽  
O. S. Raju ◽  
Ameet J. Kurthukoti ◽  
V. Satish
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class I ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Lateral Side ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Clinical Behavior ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Abstract Aim The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare the clinical behavior of resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) on primary molars with conventional and modified cavity preparations. Methods and Materials Forty-two children, 5-9 years of age, having bilateral initial occlusal caries on the mandibular primary second molars were selected for the study. A split mouth design was employed where conventional Class I cavities with a 90° cavosurface angle were prepared randomly on primary second molars on one side and modified cavities with a 1 mm straight bevel along the cavosurface margin on the contra-lateral side. These cavities were restored with RMGIC. The restorations were evaluated during subsequent visits, for a period of one year. Results At the end of one year, 90% of the restorations survived in the conventional cavity group whereas 100% of the restorations survived in the modified cavity group. Conclusion Incorporation of a bevel in Class I cavities increases the survival rate of RMGIC restorations. There was no significant difference in the clinical behavior between the two groups. However, beveling does contribute to long term clinical success of these restorations. Clinical Significance Incorporation of a straight bevel in conventional cavities will improve the retention of RMGIC by increasing the bonding area and enhancing the desired properties of the material. Citation Prabhakar AR, Raju OS, Kurthukoti AJ, Satish V. Evaluation of the Clinical Behavior of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Primary Molars: A Comparative One-year Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 February;(9)2:130-137.

A One-Year Clinical Evaluation of a High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary Molars

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yucel Yilmaz ◽  
Özge Eyuboglu ◽  
Mutlu Elcin Kocogullari ◽  
Nihal Belduz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Class I ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Abstract In this study one-year clinical results of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Fuji IX, A3, GC, Japan) were determined in class I and class II restorations in 68 primary molars with occlusal or approximal caries. Following caries removal and cavity preparation, the teeth were restored with Fuji IX. The restorations were evaluated according to the U.S. Public Health Service's (USPHS) criteria at the end of one year. Statistical analyses of the data obtained were analyzed using the X2 test. The evaluations showed no statistically significant difference between class I and class II restorations in terms of the color mismatch, anatomic form, marginal adaptation, and secondary caries (P>0.05), but they were statistically significant with regard to cavosurface marginal discoloration (P<0.05). At the end of one year, the success rate of the class I and class II restorations of the primary molars restored with Fuji IX was 94%. Citation Yilmaz Y, Eyuboglu Ö, Kocogullari ME, Belduz M. A One-Year Clinical Evaluation of a High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 February;(7)1:071-078.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document