scholarly journals Health Economics and Radium-223 (Xofigo®) in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A Case History and a Systematic Review of the Literature

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Norum ◽  
Erik R. Traasdahl ◽  
Arpad Totth ◽  
Carsten Nieder ◽  
Jan Abel Olsen
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Health Economics ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Google Search

<p><strong>OBJECTIVES: </strong>Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in Western countries. Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have caused significant pressure on health care budgets. We aimed to exemplify this dilemma presenting an example, radium-223 (Xofigo®), and review the literature.</p> <p><strong>METHODS:</strong> A 74-year-old man diagnosed with mCRPC was referred to our department in October 2014 for radium-223 therapy. We faced the following dilemma: is radium-223 standard therapy? Is it cost-effective? Medline was searched employing the following search criteria: “radium-223”, “alpharadin”, “Xofigo” and “prostate”. Exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied. Guidelines and cost-effectiveness analyses were focused. We also searched the websites of ASCO, ESMO and ISPOR. The web was searched, using Yahoo and Google search engines, for Health Technology Assessments (HTAs).</p> <p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>181 publications were identified in the Medline database. Only four studies included the word “cost”, three “economics” and none “budget” in heading or abstract. None of the publications were thorough of cost analysis (cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-minimizing or cost-of-illness analysis). Six HTAs and eight national guidelines were identified. The cost per quality adjusted life years was indicated €80.000-94,000. HTAs concluded reimbursement being not recommendable or no ultimate statement could be made. One pointed towards a limited use with caution.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> Guidelines were based on data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Health economics was not considered when guidelines were made. Most HTAs concluded this therapy not cost-effective or there was insufficient data for final conclusions. Licensing and reimbursement processes should be run simultaneously.</p>

scholarly journals Economic Evaluations of Cabazitaxel for Treatment of Post-docetaxel Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Evidence from a Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nikinaz Ashrafi Shahmirzadi ◽  
Pardis Zaboli ◽  
Monireh Afzali ◽  
Bereket Molla Tigabu ◽  
Mirhamed Hajimiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Effective Option

Background and Objectives: Prostate cancer is an ever-increasing global incidence and has become the fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men. A significant number of patients with prostate cancer develop metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). There are a few second-line treatment options for patients with post-docetaxel mCRPC. This systematic review aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of cabazitaxel for the treatment of mCRPC. Materials and Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases including: PubMed/Medline, NICE, CRD, and Scopus were searched in January 2018 for identifying full economic evaluations published in English and Persian. The risk of assessment bias and descriptive analyses of individual studies’ findings were presented. Results: Three articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the current study. All the included records had a reasonable quality. Cabazitaxel was not recommended as the most cost-effective option for the treatment of docetaxel-refractory mCRPC. Abiraterone acetate and radium-223 were the recommended cost-effective treatments for mCRPC treatment. Conclusion: We found that, in general, while cabazitaxel had equal or slightly higher improvement in Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY) as compared to the alternatives, it incurred a high cost. Despite the inclusion of a few studies in this review, cabazitaxel was not found to be a cost-effective option. Therefore, we recommend full economic evaluations to be conducted in this area.

Is olaparib cost-effective in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with at least one favorable gene mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyuan Li ◽  
Shen Lin ◽  
Lixian Zhong ◽  
Shaohong Luo ◽  
Xiaoting Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Brca1 Brca2

Aim: To compare the cost–effectiveness of olaparib versus control treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with at least one gene mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM from the US payer perspective. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to assess the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost–effectiveness ratios. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties. Results: The base-case result indicated that, for patients with specific gene mutations, olaparib gained 1.26 QALYs and USD$ 157,732 total cost. Compared with control treatment, the incremental cost–effectiveness ratio of olaparib was USD$ 248,248/QALY. The price of olaparib was the most influential parameter. Conclusion: Olaparib is not cost-effective in comparison with control treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with specific gene mutations.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Radium-223 Dichloride in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Without Previous Chemotherapy Treatment in Spain

10.36469/9777 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Eva Tirado ◽  
Daniel Callejo Velasco ◽  
Marta Rubio Cabezas ◽  
Cristina Moretones Agut ◽  
Meritxell Granell Villalón
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Docetaxel Treatment

Purpose: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of radium-223 plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) compared to BSC in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and without previous docetaxel treatment in Spain. Design and methods: A Markov model was developed to compare radium-223 versus BSC and to accrue the health outcomes and costs of a simulated cohort of mCRPC patients. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and life year (LY) were selected as health outcomes to measure the effectiveness of treatment alternatives. Main health resource use and efficacy inputs were obtained from a randomized controlled trial comparing radium-223 versus placebo. Unit costs were retrieved from Spanish databases and published sources. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to assess uncertainty. Results: Total costs and QALYs were €65 067 and 1.12 QALYs for radium-223 and €55 437 and 0.77 QALYs for BSC. Therefore, incremental costs per QALY were €27 606. The sensitivity analysis showed that with a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30 000 per QALY, radium-223 would have a probability of 48% of being cost-effective compared to BSC. Conclusions: Although results must be assessed with caution, from the Spanish National Health System perspective and based on the results of the present analysis, radium-223 could be a suitable option of health resources’ utilization for end of life mCRPC without previous docetaxel treatment, subject to a moderate level of uncertainty.

scholarly journals Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using enzalutamide for treatment of patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-96
Author(s):  
N. A. Avxentyev ◽  
M. Yu. Frolov ◽  
Yu. V. Makarova
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Markov Model ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Life Years

Background. Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases among men. Until recently, the most common treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in Russia was to continue previously started hormonal therapy. Enzalutamide is a second-generation anti-androgen indicated for treatment of CRPC, regardless of a patient’s metastatic status, which significantly increases metastasis-free survival in nmCRPC compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Objective: to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of enzalutamide use in patients with nmCRPC and the ICER of abiraterone as the first-line therapy for mCRPC from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Standard ADT regimens for nmCRPC were used as a comparator as it was the only approved treatment for nmCRPC in Russia. We proposed a Markov model of CRPC progression on enzalutamide plus ADT (hereinafter enzalutamide) or ADT based on PROSPER trial data. Model was used to calculate progression-free life years and costs of nmCRPC and post-progression CRPC treatment. Simulation period was 5 years with one cycle of 1 month. In the “cost–effectiveness” analysis, we calculated enzalutamide ICER compared to ADT. In addition, we calculated ICER for abiraterone plus ADT and prednisolone (hereinafter abiraterone) vs ADT + prednisolone in the first-line therapy of metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) as a benchmark. In both cases, time to disease progression over a 5-year period was used as an efficacy criteria.Results. According to the Markov model, progression-free life-years gained for enzalutamide were 3.12 years compared to 1.79 for ADT within a 5-year period. The average enzalutamide therapy costs were 7,989,475.8 rubles/1 patient for 5 years, which were 5,716,983.5 rubles higher than when using ADT (2,272,492.3 rubles). ICER for enzalutamide (vs ADT) was 4,307,136.3 rubles per one progression-free life-year gained. ICER for abiraterone in the first line of mCRPC treatment (vs ADT + prednisolone) was 6,191,617.4 rubles per one progression-free life-year gained.Conclusion. In the Russian healthcare system, ICER for enzalutamide in nmCRPC was 4,307,136.3 rubles and the ICER for abiraterone in mCRPC was 6,191,617.4 rubles. 

scholarly journals Early alkaline phosphatase dynamics as biomarker of survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with radium-223

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten J. van der Doelen ◽  
Agnes Stockhaus ◽  
Yuanjun Ma ◽  
Niven Mehra ◽  
Jeffrey Yachnin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Response Monitoring ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Related Event ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Skeletal Related Event

Abstract Purpose Radium-223 is a life-prolonging therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with symptomatic bone metastases. However, validated biomarkers for response monitoring are lacking. The study aim was to investigate whether early alkaline phosphatase (ALP) dynamics after the first radium-223 injection can act as surrogate marker for overall survival (OS). Methods This retrospective multicenter study included consecutive CRPC patients treated with radium-223. Patients were divided into four subgroups based on baseline ALP level (normal/elevated) and early ALP response, defined as ≥10% ALP decrease after the first radium-223 injection. Primary endpoint was OS among the subgroups. Secondary endpoints included time to first skeletal-related event, time to ALP progression, and treatment completion rate. Results A total of 180 patients were included for analysis. Median OS was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval 11.5–15.5). Patients with elevated baseline ALP without ALP response after the first injection had significantly worse OS when compared to all other patients (median OS 7.9 months versus 15.7 months, hazard ratio 2.56, 95% confidence interval 1.73–3.80, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that elevated baseline ALP without ALP response after the first injection, the number of prior systemic therapies, baseline LDH level, and baseline ECOG performance status were prognostic factors of OS. Patients with elevated baseline ALP without ALP response after the first injection had significantly shorter times to ALP progression and first skeletal-related event, and more frequently discontinued radium-223 therapy when compared to other patients. Conclusion Early treatment–induced changes in ALP after one radium-223 injection were associated with OS in metastatic CRPC patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document