Smoking attitudes of the patients with allergic rhinitis: a comparison with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Are there differences when only upper airways are involved?

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51
Author(s):  
Zeynep ÇELEBİ SÖZENER ◽  
Fatma ÇİFTÇİ ◽  
Şadan SOYYİĞİT ◽  
Ömür AYDIN ◽  
Elif ŞEN ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Helen Steveling-Klein ◽  
Claudia Gerhards ◽  
Caroline Zaehringer ◽  
Nebal Abu Hussein ◽  
Selina Dürr ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Prevalence and impact of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain unclear. We hypothesized that CRS is more frequent in patients with COPD compared to controls and we aimed to evaluate the odds of CRS in both groups. Methods: We recruited patients with COPD and a healthy control group in a tertiary referral hospital in Switzerland. Diagnosis of CRS was defined according to published guidelines and supported by computed tomography (CT) findings. Sino-nasal-outcome-test-20 (SNOT-20) and sino-nasal-outcome-test-primary-nasal-symptom-score (SNOT-PNS-score) were self-assessed with a cut-off for abnormality of >12. Results: Data from 83 COPD patients (35 females, age: 67 years ± 10) and 34 controls (18 females, age: 67 years ± 12) were analyzed. In the COPD group 14 out of 83 (20.3%) fulfilled the diagnosis of CRS compared to only 1 out of 34 (3%) in the control group (OR 6.7; 95% CI 0.84-53.10; p = 0.064). Forty-eight COPD patients (59%) and 14 controls (41%) had an abnormal SNOT-20 score (OR 1.96; 95% CI 0.87-4.40; p=0.10), with a median score of 16.0 (ICR 21) in COPD patients compared to a median score of 8.0 (ICR 13) in controls (p=0.001). The SNOT-PNS-score was abnormal in 49 COPD patients (59%) and in 9 controls (26%) (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.66-9.64; p=0.001). Abnormal findings of the upper airways did not correlate with COPD severity or smoking status. Conclusions: CRS was a frequent diagnosis in patients with COPD. CRS reduces quality of life in this patient group.


2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Maricoto ◽  
Luís Vaz Rodrigues ◽  
Gilberto Teixeira ◽  
Carla Valente ◽  
Lília Andrade ◽  
...  

<strong>Introduction:</strong> Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma affect almost 300 million individuals. Inhaled therapy is often associated with technical errors reducing efficacy and compliance.<br /><strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate the inhalation technique and its relation with clinical and functional control in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Analytical cross-sectional study including patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with any type of inhaler device. Demographic data and inquiry about previous teaching of inhalation technique were collected in all participants. Inhalation technique was evaluated in: Step 1 - device activation; Step 2 - previous expiration; Step 3 - inspiration; Step 4 - end inspiratory pause. Clinical control was assessed from the questionnaires Asthma Control Test, Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, modified Medical Research Council and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test. Spirometric evaluation was performed in all participants.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> From a total of 62 subjects, 74.19% made at least one error, mainly during step 2 (53.2%). Previous education on inhalation technique was associated with lower number of errors (p = 0.014). There was no association between number of errors and age (p = 0.321), years of diagnosis (p = 0.119) or spirometric evaluation (p &gt; 0.05). In asthma an association was found between number of errors and Asthma Control Test (p = 0.032) and Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (p = 0.008).<br /><strong>Discussion and Conclusion:</strong> Teaching inhalation technique has a positive impact on its future performance. Most patients make mistakes, affecting clinical control in asthma, although in chronic obstructive pulmonary isease no relation was found. This is an ongoing work that aims to reevaluate inhalation technique after patients’ education and its further impact.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document