scholarly journals Assessment of Inhalation Technique in Clinical and Functional Control of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Maricoto ◽  
Luís Vaz Rodrigues ◽  
Gilberto Teixeira ◽  
Carla Valente ◽  
Lília Andrade ◽  
...  

<strong>Introduction:</strong> Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma affect almost 300 million individuals. Inhaled therapy is often associated with technical errors reducing efficacy and compliance.<br /><strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate the inhalation technique and its relation with clinical and functional control in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Analytical cross-sectional study including patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with any type of inhaler device. Demographic data and inquiry about previous teaching of inhalation technique were collected in all participants. Inhalation technique was evaluated in: Step 1 - device activation; Step 2 - previous expiration; Step 3 - inspiration; Step 4 - end inspiratory pause. Clinical control was assessed from the questionnaires Asthma Control Test, Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, modified Medical Research Council and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test. Spirometric evaluation was performed in all participants.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> From a total of 62 subjects, 74.19% made at least one error, mainly during step 2 (53.2%). Previous education on inhalation technique was associated with lower number of errors (p = 0.014). There was no association between number of errors and age (p = 0.321), years of diagnosis (p = 0.119) or spirometric evaluation (p &gt; 0.05). In asthma an association was found between number of errors and Asthma Control Test (p = 0.032) and Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (p = 0.008).<br /><strong>Discussion and Conclusion:</strong> Teaching inhalation technique has a positive impact on its future performance. Most patients make mistakes, affecting clinical control in asthma, although in chronic obstructive pulmonary isease no relation was found. This is an ongoing work that aims to reevaluate inhalation technique after patients’ education and its further impact.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diksha Sapkota ◽  
Yogesh Raj Amatya

Background: Inhalation mode of drug delivery is the mainstay treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, however; incorrect technique prevents patients from receiving maximal therapeutic benefi ts.Objectives: To assess usage technique of rotahaler among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and identify factors affecting its performance.Methods: Descriptive cross sectional study was conducted to assess rotahaler (single unit dose dry powder inhaler) inhalation technique among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital. The study population consisted of 100 respondents using rotahaler for at least one year. Data collection was done by standard checklist, semi structured questionnaire via observation and interview methods respectively.Results: Correct inhalation technique was found in 37% of total respondents. Nearly two out of three respondents (61%) failed to breathe out deeply before inhaling. Majority of the respondents (59%) failed to hold breath for at least 10 second and 25% were unable to breathe in deeply. Age, occupation, source of inhalation instruction and re-demonstration of the technique were found to be signifi cantly associated with the correct inhalation technique (p <0.05).Conclusion: More than half of the respondents had incorrect inhalation technique, so health education program targeting the common identifi ed errors should be carried out. Arrangements should be made for regular involvement of pharmacist in teaching and re-demonstration to ensure good inhaler technique. This would ultimately lead to a greater clinical response and improved patient compliance.Journal of Kathmandu Medical CollegeVol. 5, No. 1, Issue 15, Jan.-Mar., 2016, Page: 11-17


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document