scholarly journals Study of the metabolic effects of Ramadan fasting on patients with type 2 diabetes. Relation to glycemic control, hypoglycemic events and diabetic complications

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azza Ismail ◽  
Magdy Helmy Meglaa ◽  
Mai Badrah ◽  
Menna Farghaly
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1099-1108
Author(s):  
R. Bouguerra ◽  
A. Belkadhi ◽  
J. Jabrane ◽  
J. Hamzaoui ◽  
C. Maatki ◽  
...  

Nous avons analysé les effets métaboliques, en particulier les variations du cholestérol HDL, du jeûne du mois de ramadan chez 25 diabétiques de type 2 bien équilibrés traités par le régime ou les antidiabétiques oraux. Nos patients ont été évalués trois semaines avant le ramadan, durant la quatrième semaine du mois de ramadan et trois semaines aprés le mois de ramadan. Cette évaluation a comporté une enquête clinique, une enquête nutritionnelle et des analyses biologiques. Le jeûne du mois de ramadan n’a pas eu d’influence sur le poids, la tension artérielle, la glycémie, la fructosamine et l’hémoglobine A1c. Nous avons trouvé une relation négative entre les variations du cholestérol HDL et la consommation alimentaire de cholestérol. Le cholestérol HDL a augmenté de 13 % à la fin du jeûne et de 23 % trois semaines après la fin du jeûne chez les diabétiques ayant eu une consommation alimentaire de cholestérol inférieure à 400 mg/j


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 180-185
Author(s):  
Erhan Önalan ◽  
Nevzat Gozel ◽  
Burkay Yakar

Objective:  Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic and progressive disease that significantly impairs the workforce and economy due to its complications. This study aims to evaluate patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus who use different oral antidiabetic medications with regard to glycemic control and diabetic complications. Materials and Methods: This study included 200 patients who were being followed-up for a diagnosis of Type 2 DM. Results: Of the 200 patients included in the study, 131 were on metformin monotherapy and 69 were on metformin and gliclazide combination therapy. HbA1c value of Metformin monotherapy prescribed patients was7,6%±1,5, metformin+gliclazide prescribed patients was 8,2%±1,9. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood glucose levels (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to microvascular complications and body mass index. Conclusion: Our study determined that the level of glycemic control manifested by Type 2 DM patients was suboptimal despite using different types of oral antidiabetics and that their body mass indices were high. We reached the conclusion that the present situation is linked to factors such as incorrect dietary habits, inadequate exercise and walking, failure to comply with the medical treatment suggested by the physician, and lack of awareness about the severity of the disease.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phil Schwab ◽  
Vishal Saundankar ◽  
Jonathan Bouchard ◽  
Neil Wintfeld ◽  
Brandon Suehs ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoya Emoto ◽  
Akimi Soga ◽  
Izumi Fukuda ◽  
Kyoko Tanimura-Inagaki ◽  
Taro Harada ◽  
...  

Abstract Socioeconomic status has profound effects on glycemic control and diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Sex differences are one of the most important factors in socioeconomic status and may vary among countries or areas. The study aim was to determine if sex differences are associated with glycemic control and diabetic complications in Tokyo, Japan, one of the most educated countries in the world. This study initially enrolled 3307 patients treated from 2017 to 2019 at the medical school hospital located in Tokyo. All enrolled patients were asked to complete behavioral and socioeconomic surveys. A total of 276 type 2 diabetic patients (175 males, age 64.1 ± 0.88 y, disease duration 15.2 ± 0.78 y, mean ± SE y; 101 females, age 64.0 ± 1.1 y, disease duration 15.6 ± 1.01 y) agreed to participate in the study. The survey questionnaire has been previously reported in detail (Patient Preference and Adherence, 10:2151-2162, 2016). The questionnaire attempted to determine estimations of risk preference regarding things like lottery gambling and accident insurance. After reviewing the patients’ answers, however, it became clear that some were illogical, which suggested that these patients did not understand the context of the questions, the hypothetical economical situations, or even the instructions, probably because of lower literacy skills. Thus, we labeled these patients as the unreasonable (UR) group (n = 81), and the patients who provided appropriate answers, even if extremely risk averse or risk loving, were labeled as the reasonable (R) group (n = 195). The prevalence of UR answers generally increased with age (&lt;50 y, 16%; 50-64 y, 10%; 65-74 y, 37%; ≥75 y, 64%) (p &lt; 0.0001). After age adjustment, there was a significant correlation between the UR answers and educational attainment in both sexes. The prevalence of UR answers was significantly higher in females (38.6%) than in males (24%) (p &lt; 0.01), which may be partly because the average number of educational years was lower for females than for males (males, 13.8 y; females, 12.9 y; p &lt; 0.05), but both averages are very high among all countries. The prevalence of retinopathy was significantly higher in the UR than the R group in males (p &lt; 0.05), but not in females. Job and economic status were not associated with prevalence of retinopathy. These results suggest that effects of literacy skills on progression of diabetic retinopathy may be sex dependent. Although the mechanism underlying this finding is unknown, sex may be an important biological factor beyond socioeconomic status in highly educated high-income countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document