scholarly journals Effect of contrast medium on treatment modalities planned with different photon beam energies: a planning study

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 688-711
Author(s):  
Manindra Bhushan ◽  
Deepak Tripathi ◽  
Girigesh Yadav ◽  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Abhinav Dewan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-500
Author(s):  
Joris Hrycyk ◽  
Johannes T Heverhagen ◽  
Ingrid Boehm

In addition to anaphylactic reactions induced by contrast media (CM), extravasation is an adverse reaction that occurs immediately, requires special treatment, and attention. Since radiologists are often not familiar with either prophylactic or treatment modalities, the goal of this paper is to summarize the major facts and recommendations with respect to CM extravasation under practical clinical aspects.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (6Part24) ◽  
pp. 3692-3692
Author(s):  
J Chung ◽  
J Lee ◽  
J Kim ◽  
I Kim ◽  
T Suh

1994 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-556
Author(s):  
Basia Żaba
Keyword(s):  

VASA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidenhagen ◽  
Bombien ◽  
Meimarakis ◽  
Geisler ◽  
A. Koeppel

Open surgical repair of lesions of the descending thoracic aorta, such as aneurysm, dissection and traumatic rupture, has been the “state-of-the-art” treatment for many decades. However, in specialized cardiovascular centers, thoracic endovascular aortic repair and hybrid aortic procedures have been implemented as novel treatment options. The current clinical results show that these procedures can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates. However, due to a lack of randomized trials, the level of reliability of these new treatment modalities remains a matter of discussion. Clinical decision-making is generally based on the experience of the vascular center as well as on individual factors, such as life expectancy, comorbidity, aneurysm aetiology, aortic diameter and morphology. This article will review and discuss recent publications of open surgical, hybrid thoracic aortic (in case of aortic arch involvement) and endovascular repair in complex pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta.


Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartanusz ◽  
Porchet

The treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression is complex. The three treatment modalities that are currently applied (in a histologically non-specific manner) are surgery, radiotherapy and the administration of steroids. The development of new spinal instrumentations and surgical approaches considerably changed the extent of therapeutic options in this field. These new surgical techniques have made it possible to resect these tumours totally, with subsequent vertebral reconstruction and spinal stabilization. In this respect, it is important to clearly identify those patients who can benefit from such an extensive surgery. We present our management algorithm to help select patients for surgery and at the same time identifying those for whom primary non-surgical therapy would be indicated. The retrospective review of surgically treated patients in our department in the last four years reveals a meagre application of conventional guidelines for the selection of the appropriate operative approach in the surgical management of these patients. The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document