scholarly journals Tissue viability imaging of skin microcirculation following exposure to whole body cryotherapy (-110°C) and cold water immersion (8°C)

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Costello ◽  
P. M. McNamara ◽  
M. L. O’Connell ◽  
L. A. Algar ◽  
M. J. Leahy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Tissue Viability ◽  
Skin Microcirculation ◽  
Viability Imaging ◽  
Whole Body Cryotherapy

scholarly journals Recovery From Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: Cold-Water Immersion Versus Whole-Body Cryotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd-Elbasset Abaïdia ◽  
Julien Lamblin ◽  
Barthélémy Delecroix ◽  
Cédric Leduc ◽  
Alan McCall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Countermovement Jump ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Physically Active ◽  
Exercise Induced ◽  
Whole Body Cryotherapy

Purpose:To compare the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI) and whole-body cryotherapy (WBC) on recovery kinetics after exercise-induced muscle damage.Methods:Ten physically active men performed single-leg hamstring eccentric exercise comprising 5 sets of 15 repetitions. Immediately postexercise, subjects were exposed in a randomized crossover design to CWI (10 min at 10°C) or WBC (3 min at –110°C) recovery. Creatine kinase concentrations, knee-flexor eccentric (60°/s) and posterior lower-limb isometric (60°) strength, single-leg and 2-leg countermovement jumps, muscle soreness, and perception of recovery were measured. The tests were performed before and immediately, 24, 48, and 72 h after exercise.Results:Results showed a very likely moderate effect in favor of CWI for single-leg (effect size [ES] = 0.63; 90% confidence interval [CI] = –0.13 to 1.38) and 2-leg countermovement jump (ES = 0.68; 90% CI = –0.08 to 1.43) 72 h after exercise. Soreness was moderately lower 48 h after exercise after CWI (ES = –0.68; 90% CI = –1.44 to 0.07). Perception of recovery was moderately enhanced 24 h after exercise for CWI (ES = –0.62; 90% CI = –1.38 to 0.13). Trivial and small effects of condition were found for the other outcomes.Conclusions:CWI was more effective than WBC in accelerating recovery kinetics for countermovement-jump performance at 72 h postexercise. CWI also demonstrated lower soreness and higher perceived recovery levels across 24–48 h postexercise.

Dissociated Time Course Response of Muscle Damage Recovery After Whole-body Cryotherapy and Cold-water Immersion

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Martim Bottaro ◽  
João Batista Ferreira-Junior ◽  
Amilton Vieira ◽  
Angelina F. Siqueira ◽  
João Durigan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Whole Body Cryotherapy

scholarly journals Recovery following a marathon: a comparison of cold water immersion, whole body cryotherapy and a placebo control

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura J. Wilson ◽  
Emma Cockburn ◽  
Katherine Paice ◽  
Scott Sinclair ◽  
Tanwir Faki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Whole Body Cryotherapy

scholarly journals Whole body cryotherapy, cold water immersion, or a placebo following resistance exercise: a case of mind over matter?

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura J. Wilson ◽  
Lygeri Dimitriou ◽  
Frank A. Hills ◽  
Marcela B. Gondek ◽  
Emma Cockburn
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Whole Body Cryotherapy

Cold-water acclimation does not modify whole-body fluid regulation during subsequent cold-water immersion

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Stocks ◽  
M. J. Patterson ◽  
D. E. Hyde ◽  
A. B. Jenkins ◽  
K. D. Mittleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fluid ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Fluid Regulation ◽  
Body Fluid Regulation

scholarly journals Cooling Effectiveness of a Modified Cold-Water Immersion Method After Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 946-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Luhring ◽  
Cory L. Butts ◽  
Cody R. Smith ◽  
Jeffrey A. Bonacci ◽  
Ramon C. Ylanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Heat Stroke ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Exertional Heat Stroke

Context: Recommended treatment for exertional heat stroke includes whole-body cold-water immersion (CWI). However, remote locations or monetary or spatial restrictions can challenge the feasibility of CWI. Thus, the development of a modified, portable CWI method would allow for optimal treatment of exertional heat stroke in the presence of these challenges. Objective: To determine the cooling rate of modified CWI (tarp-assisted cooling with oscillation [TACO]) after exertional hyperthermia. Design: Randomized, crossover controlled trial. Setting: Environmental chamber (temperature = 33.4°C ± 0.8°C, relative humidity = 55.7% ± 1.9%). Patients or Other Participants: Sixteen volunteers (9 men, 7 women; age = 26 ± 4.7 years, height = 1.76 ± 0.09 m, mass = 72.5 ± 9.0 kg, body fat = 20.7% ± 7.1%) with no history of compromised thermoregulation. Intervention(s): Participants completed volitional exercise (cycling or treadmill) until they demonstrated a rectal temperature (Tre) ≥39.0°C. After exercise, participants transitioned to a semirecumbent position on a tarp until either Tre reached 38.1°C or 15 minutes had elapsed during the control (no immersion [CON]) or TACO (immersion in 151 L of 2.1°C ± 0.8°C water) treatment. Main Outcome Measure(s): The Tre, heart rate, and blood pressure (reported as mean arterial pressure) were assessed precooling and postcooling. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures analysis of variance with appropriate post hoc t tests and Bonferroni correction. Results: Before cooling, the Tre was not different between conditions (CON: 39.27°C ± 0.26°C, TACO: 39.30°C ± 0.39°C; P = .62; effect size = −0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.2, 0.1). At postcooling, the Tre was decreased in the TACO (38.10°C ± 0.16°C) compared with the CON condition (38.74°C ± 0.38°C; P < .001; effect size = 2.27; 95% CI = 0.4, 0.9). The rate of cooling was greater during the TACO (0.14 ± 0.06°C/min) than the CON treatment (0.04°C/min ± 0.02°C/min; t15 = −8.84; P < .001; effect size = 2.21; 95% CI = −0.13, −0.08). These differences occurred despite an insignificant increase in fluid consumption during exercise preceding CON (0.26 ± 0.29 L) versus TACO (0.19 ± 0.26 L; t12 = 1.73; P = .11; effect size = 0.48; 95% CI = −0.02, 0.14) treatment. Decreases in heart rate did not differ between the TACO and CON conditions (t15 = −1.81; P = .09; effect size = 0.45; 95% CI = −22, 2). Mean arterial pressure was greater at postcooling with TACO (84.2 ± 6.6 mm Hg) than with CON (67.0 ± 9.0 mm Hg; P < .001; effect size = 2.25; 95% CI = 13, 21). Conclusions: The TACO treatment provided faster cooling than did the CON treatment. When location, monetary, or spatial restrictions are present, TACO represents an effective alternative to traditional CWI in the emergency treatment of patients with exertional hyperthermia.

Cooling and Performance Recovery of Trained Athletes: A Meta-Analytical Review

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wigand Poppendieck ◽  
Oliver Faude ◽  
Melissa Wegmann ◽  
Tim Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Intensive Training ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Performance Recovery ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Whole Body Cooling

Purpose:Cooling after exercise has been investigated as a method to improve recovery during intensive training or competition periods. As many studies have included untrained subjects, the transfer of those results to trained athletes is questionable.Methods:Therefore, the authors conducted a literature search and located 21 peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials addressing the effects of cooling on performance recovery in trained athletes.Results:For all studies, the effect of cooling on performance was determined and effect sizes (Hedges’ g) were calculated. Regarding performance measurement, the largest average effect size was found for sprint performance (2.6%, g = 0.69), while for endurance parameters (2.6%, g = 0.19), jump (3.0%, g = 0.15), and strength (1.8%, g = 0.10), effect sizes were smaller. The effects were most pronounced when performance was evaluated 96 h after exercise (4.3%, g = 1.03). Regarding the exercise used to induce fatigue, effects after endurance training (2.4%, g = 0.35) were larger than after strength-based exercise (2.4%, g = 0.11). Cold-water immersion (2.9%, g = 0.34) and cryogenic chambers (3.8%, g = 0.25) seem to be more beneficial with respect to performance than cooling packs (−1.4%, g= −0.07). For cold-water application, whole-body immersion (5.1%, g = 0.62) was significantly more effective than immersing only the legs or arms (1.1%, g = 0.10).Conclusions:In summary, the average effects of cooling on recovery of trained athletes were rather small (2.4%, g = 0.28). However, under appropriate conditions (whole-body cooling, recovery from sprint exercise), postexercise cooling seems to have positive effects that are large enough to be relevant for competitive athletes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document