scholarly journals Association of Health Sciences Reasoning Test Scores With Academic and Experiential Performance

2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy C. Cox ◽  
Jacqueline E. McLaughlin
2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 916-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Hanlon ◽  
Thomas J. Prihoda ◽  
Ronald G. Verrett ◽  
John D. Jones ◽  
Stephan J. Haney ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (4_Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7411500048p1
Author(s):  
Catherine Cavaliere ◽  
Pamela Story ◽  
Joanna Such ◽  
Aileen Burke ◽  
Kathryn Kendrick

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-96
Author(s):  
Mitja Ružojčić ◽  
Zvonimir Galić ◽  
Antun Palanović ◽  
Maja Parmač Kovačić ◽  
Andreja Bubić

Abstract. To better understand the process of responding to the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression (CRT-A) and its implication for the test's use in personnel selection, we conducted two lab studies in which we compared test scores and eye movements of participants responding honestly and faking the test. Study 1 results showed that, although participants might try to respond differently to the CRT-A while faking, it remains an indirect and unfakeable measure as long as the test's purpose is undisclosed. Study 2 showed that revealing the true purpose of the CRT-A diminishes the test's indirect nature so the test becomes fakeable, solving it requires less attention and participants direct their eyes more to response alternatives congruent with the presentational demands.


1989 ◽  
Vol 64 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1263-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Walter Bordages

Self-actualizing individuals, according to Maslow (1954), are hypothesized to operate autonomously of external expectations due to their undistorted perceptions of their own realistic abilities. Scores on the Personal Orientation Inventory, a measure of self-actualization, were used to divide subjects into high, medium, or low self-actualizing categories. Subjects were given a Logical Reasoning Ability Test over three treatment conditions: high, low, and no expectations with regard to performance. Analyses indicated greater personal autonomy for high and moderate self-actualizing subjects than in nonself-actualizing subjects, who showed the greatest variance in their reasoning test scores.


2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison F. Primrose ◽  
Mary Fuller ◽  
Michael Littledyke

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-250
Author(s):  
Brandy Weidman ◽  
Helen Salisbury

Objective: Critical thinking is an important skill that sonographers must develop beginning in educational programs and into professional practice. Critical thinking requires students to reflect on information, use judgment skills, and engage in higher levels of thinking, including analysis, interpretation, inference, evaluation, and explanation, to formulate reliable decisions. Methods: Current research related to critical thinking has focused on medicine, nursing, physical therapy, pharmacy, and dental programs, but there has been no description of assessing sonography students. The Dreyfus model has been used as a framework to describe acquired skills that reflects students’ progress from novice to expert clinicians. This model illustrates specific cognitive abilities that students develop as they advance in education. Results: This review of the literature describes critical thinking skills coupled with a framework to understand different levels of cognitive thinking, as well as how it can be assessed. Conclusion: To understand differences between undergraduate sonography students and experts, the Dreyfus model is an excellent model to recognize progression. It can be used with the Health Sciences Reasoning Test, which is a nationally recognized critical thinking examination that can ascertain different levels of health sciences students’ critical thinking skills.


1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Powers ◽  
Donald A. Rock
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document