scholarly journals Evaluation of Clinical and Communication Skills of Pharmacy Students and Pharmacists with an Objective Structured Clinical Examination

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Urteaga ◽  
Rebecca L. Attridge ◽  
John M. Tovar ◽  
Amy P. Witte
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination

scholarly journals Team-Based Decision-Making in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Dagenais ◽  
Shane A Pawluk ◽  
Daniel C Rainkie ◽  
Kyle Wilby
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Competency Framework ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Reflective Journal ◽  
Students Attitudes

  Evaluation of pre-licensure students’ competency in team-based decision-making is lacking. The purposes of this study were to evaluate pre-licensure pharmacy students’ competency in team-based decision-making in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and to determine whether performance correlated with reflective assignment scores. Students’ self-assessment and conceptualization of team-based decision-making in practice was also evaluated. Twenty-three pre-licensure pharmacy students’ competency in team-based decision-making was evaluated in an OSCE station and with a reflective journal assignment; rubric scores for both evaluations were compared using Spearman’s rank order analysis. Students completed an 18-item questionnaire regarding attitudes, confidence, and perceptions related to team-based decision-making. Descriptive statistics and construct analysis with open coding were used to analyse questionnaire results. Mean OSCE station and reflective journal scores were 45% and 66.3%, respectively, and were not correlated. Students’ attitudes toward team-based decision-making were positive, and they reported performing associated behaviours during experiential education rotations. Students appropriately defined ‘team-based decision-making’ and were highly confident in performing related activities. However, students’ conceptualization of team-based decision-making did not align with the pharmacy program’s competency framework.  Three key themes were identified through the study analyses: 1) student performance is dependent on assessment context when evaluating collaborator-related competencies; 2) there is a mismatch between students’ perceived competency and objectively measured competence when collaborator outcomes were assessed within an OSCE; and 3) students’ perceptions of team-based decision-making do not align with the program’s competency framework. Future research is necessary to assess competency and perceptions of team-based decision-making in students from other healthcare professions, and to further evaluate whether pre-licensure students are “collaborative practice ready”.   Article Type: Case Study

scholarly journals An objective structured clinical examination to assess the communication skills of students

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Bekbergenova ◽  
G Derbissalina ◽  
A Umbetzhanova ◽  
G Alibekova ◽  
G Mauletbayeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Professional Competence ◽  
Communicative Competence ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Practical Skills ◽  
Clinical Exam ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Exam

Abstract Background Communicative competence is one of the important components of professional competence that needs to be developed in the process of training future doctors. Methods At the end of the study of the “General Practice” module, students of the 5th year of the specialty General Medicine must pass a two-stage exam consisting of comprehensive testing and acceptance of practical skills of an objective structured clinical exam (OSKE) with the participation of volunteers. Students, who passed the exam, anonymously filled out the questionnaire on the evaluation of the organization of the OSKE with volunteers and their communication skills. Results The analysis of the questionnaires showed that 4% of the students noted the unfriendliness of the volunteers, 27% wrote that it was difficult to engage with the volunteers in the collection of the anamnesis, 2% of the students, unfortunately, had never before encountered a similar situation. 12% of students who passed the exam wished to improve the communication skills of the volunteers themselves, for example, they advised to speak louder, not to ask unnecessary and unnecessary questions, to get more real in the role of the patient. Only 10% of examinees decided that OSKE did not develop their communication skills; 24% noted individual stations, which caused them some difficulties. However, the students themselves acknowledged their poor preparedness, including during communication with standardized patients. Conclusions The analysis of the questionnaires showed that the students themselves are self-critical of their communication skills and recognize the need for their continuous improvement. Key messages The student’s communicative competence can be assessed by conducting an objective structured clinical examination. Conducting an objective structured clinical examination with volunteers can improve the communicative competence of students.

Impact of test anxiety on pharmacy students’ performance in Objective Structured Clinical Examination: a cross-sectional survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad A. Hadi ◽  
Majid Ali ◽  
Abdul Haseeb ◽  
Mahmoud M.A. Mohamed ◽  
Mahmoud E. Elrggal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Anxiety ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

An Objective Structured Clinical Examination of Communication Skills for Child Neurology Residents

2021 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dara V.F. Albert ◽  
Margie Ream ◽  
Nicole Verbeck ◽  
Todd Lash ◽  
Pedro Weisleder
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Child Neurology

scholarly journals The Study on the General Medical Students’ Clinical Competency in Problem Solving, Communication Skills, Procedure, History and Physical Examination and Critical and Non-Critical Indicators in Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haniye Mastour ◽  
Ali Emadzadeh ◽  
AmirAli Moodi Ghalibaf
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Competency ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Introduction: Clinical education is the basic pillar and heart of medical education. In fact, it is one of the most important manifestations of teaching and learning in professions related to medical sciences, which leads to the clinical competency of learners. Assessing new physicians before entering the field of clinical activities can be a reliable criterion for evaluating the quality of their clinical skills.The current study was done to investigate the knowledge, practice, and general clinical competency of general medicine graduates before entering the field of clinical activities. The study was in line with according to the document of the minimum competency expected from general practitioners in Iran. Methods In this descriptive cross-sectional study, the scores of different stations of the national Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), which be held at the end of the general medicine course in Iran, were collected at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. These scores were subdivided into four specific areas and two critical and non-critical indicators of capability were gathered from the exam assessors' checklists. Totally, 266 students who participated in six periodicities of clinical competency tests at the end of the general medicine course at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences were included in the study by the census method. The clinical competency of general medicine graduates assessed in the areas of problem-solving, communication skills, practical action (procedures and critical skills), taking the history, performing physical examinations, and critical and non-critical indicators by the OSCE. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics including independent t-test, one-way and two-way analysis of variance by using SPSS. Results The results showed that the effect of different areas of the OSCE (F(3,5652) = 7.022 and P = 0.001) and participants' performance based on their critical and non-critical indicators (T = 1.976 and P = 0.04) are significant with 95% confidence interval. Conclusion The OSCE improves the standards of clinical competencies of new physicians and can make beneficial changes in clinical education at medical schools.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document