Experiences and perceptions of pharmacy students and pharmacists with a community pharmacy‐based objective structured clinical examination

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1085-1092
Author(s):  
Bernadette Cornelison ◽  
Beth Zerr
Keyword(s):  
Community Pharmacy ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination

scholarly journals Team-Based Decision-Making in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Dagenais ◽  
Shane A Pawluk ◽  
Daniel C Rainkie ◽  
Kyle Wilby
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Competency Framework ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Reflective Journal ◽  
Students Attitudes

  Evaluation of pre-licensure students’ competency in team-based decision-making is lacking. The purposes of this study were to evaluate pre-licensure pharmacy students’ competency in team-based decision-making in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and to determine whether performance correlated with reflective assignment scores. Students’ self-assessment and conceptualization of team-based decision-making in practice was also evaluated. Twenty-three pre-licensure pharmacy students’ competency in team-based decision-making was evaluated in an OSCE station and with a reflective journal assignment; rubric scores for both evaluations were compared using Spearman’s rank order analysis. Students completed an 18-item questionnaire regarding attitudes, confidence, and perceptions related to team-based decision-making. Descriptive statistics and construct analysis with open coding were used to analyse questionnaire results. Mean OSCE station and reflective journal scores were 45% and 66.3%, respectively, and were not correlated. Students’ attitudes toward team-based decision-making were positive, and they reported performing associated behaviours during experiential education rotations. Students appropriately defined ‘team-based decision-making’ and were highly confident in performing related activities. However, students’ conceptualization of team-based decision-making did not align with the pharmacy program’s competency framework.  Three key themes were identified through the study analyses: 1) student performance is dependent on assessment context when evaluating collaborator-related competencies; 2) there is a mismatch between students’ perceived competency and objectively measured competence when collaborator outcomes were assessed within an OSCE; and 3) students’ perceptions of team-based decision-making do not align with the program’s competency framework. Future research is necessary to assess competency and perceptions of team-based decision-making in students from other healthcare professions, and to further evaluate whether pre-licensure students are “collaborative practice ready”.   Article Type: Case Study

Impact of test anxiety on pharmacy students’ performance in Objective Structured Clinical Examination: a cross-sectional survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad A. Hadi ◽  
Majid Ali ◽  
Abdul Haseeb ◽  
Mahmoud M.A. Mohamed ◽  
Mahmoud E. Elrggal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Anxiety ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Pharmacy students’ views on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): findings from two Malaysian universities

2021 ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Mohamed Hassan Elnaem ◽  
Muhammad Zuljalil Ilham Wahab ◽  
Aqilah Mohd Ali ◽  
Umi Syuhada Abd Rahim ◽  
Nuraqilah Zulkifli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Time Allocation ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Constructive Feedback ◽  
Study Participants

Objectives: To investigate and compare the views of undergraduate pharmacy students in two Malaysian pharmacy schools (one private and one public) regarding the organisation, quality, and objectivity of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken among penultimate and final year students in two Malaysian pharmacy schools between October to December 2019 (International Islamic University Malaysia [IIUM] and University of Cyberjaya [UoC]). A questionnaire was developed, tested, validated and then distributed to study participants through online Google forms. Results: A total of 221 undergraduate pharmacy students participated in the study. Students from the public university disagreed with the allocated time for the OSCE stations (IIUM 63.9% and 48.7% vs UoC 11.6% and 14.3%). Relatively few students agreed that OSCE is a less stressful type of assessment compared to other traditional methods (IIUM 7.2% and 10.3% vs UoC 39.5% and 23.8%). Both groups of students’ also disagreed that OSCE marks were likely to be affected by the student’s gender (IIUM 73.2% and 66.7% vs UoC 67.4% and 78.6%). Conclusion: The majority of participants had positive views on the organisation, quality, and objectivity of OSCE, with several differences between students in public and private universities. There are few areas to be further considered to ensure more positive OSCE experience for students such as revision on the time allocation for every station and on the provision of timely constructive feedback.

scholarly journals Malaysian Pharmacy Students' Assessment of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Awaisu ◽  
Norny Syafinaz Abd Rahman ◽  
Mohamad Haniki Nik Mohamed ◽  
Siti Halimah Bux Rahman Bux ◽  
Nor Ilyani Mohamed Nazar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination

scholarly journals Objective structured clinical examination for pharmacy students in Qatar: cultural and contextual barriers to assessment

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Wilby ◽  
Emily Black ◽  
Zubin Austin ◽  
Banan Mukhalalati ◽  
Samar Aboulsoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Contextual Barriers
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document