scholarly journals Pile Capacity Predictions Using Static and Dynamic Load Testing

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Darrag
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Load ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Pile Capacity

Driven cast-in-situ pile capacity: insights from dynamic and static load testing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin N. Flynn ◽  
Bryan A. McCabe
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Load ◽  
Shear Stresses ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Pile Capacity ◽  
Compression Load ◽  
Shaft Resistance ◽  
Pile Installation ◽  
Cast Concrete ◽  
Load Tests

Driven cast-in-situ (DCIS) piles are classified as large displacement piles. However, the use of an oversized driving shoe introduces additional complexities influencing shaft resistance mobilisation, over and above those applicable to preformed displacement piles. Therefore, several design codes restrict the magnitude of shaft resistance in DCIS pile design. In this paper, a series of dynamic load tests was performed on the temporary steel driving tubes during DCIS pile installation at three UK sites. The instrumented piles were subsequently subjected to maintained compression load tests to failure. The mobilised shear stresses inferred from the dynamic tests during driving were two to five times smaller than those on the as-constructed piles during maintained load testing. This was attributed to soil loosening along the tube shaft arising from the oversized base shoe. Nevertheless, the radial stress reductions appear to be reversible by the freshly-cast concrete fluid pressures which provide lower-bound estimates of radial total stress inferred from the measured shear stresses during static loading. This recovery in shaft resistance is not recognised in some European design practices, resulting in conservative design lengths. Whilst the shaft resistance of DCIS piles was underpredicted by the dynamic load tests, reasonable estimates of base resistance were obtained.

Semi-empirical methods versus dynamic load testing in piles

Geotecnia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 89-113
Author(s):  
Jean Felix Cabette ◽  
◽  
<br>Heloisa Helena Silva Gonçalves ◽  
<br>Fernando Antônio Marinho ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Load ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Empirical Methods ◽  
Semi Empirical

scholarly journals Sonic Logging Vs PIT untuk Mendeteksi Integritas Pondasi Tiang

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1031
Author(s):  
Gouw Tjie Liong
Keyword(s):  
Basic Theory ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Destructive Testing ◽  
Pile Capacity ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Integrity Testing ◽  
First Category ◽  
Sonic Logging ◽  
Second Category ◽  
Pile Integrity

Non destructive testing on piles can be divided into two main categories. The first category is to find out the integrity of the piles, such as pile integrity testing (PIT) and sonic logging. The second category is to find out the pile capacity, such as dynamic load testing/pile driving analysis. Since the early 1990s, the application of the tests was brought into practice and gained its popularity in Indonesia. However, the basic theory behind the testing has not been widely disseminated. This study tries to elaborate the first category of the testing, i.e. the pile integrity testing and sonic logging. The basic theory, the advantages and disadvantages, the application, the limitation and the interpretation of those techniques shall be discussed. Comparison on case studies of those testing methods also shall be given. 

Predicting the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Single Piles Based on CPTU

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 4402-4407
Author(s):  
Yong Hong Miao ◽  
Guo Jun Cai ◽  
Song Yu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Load Test ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Pile Capacity ◽  
Piezocone Penetration Test ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Pile Load Test ◽  
Single Piles ◽  
Pile Load Tests ◽  
Best Fit

Six methods to determine axial pile capacity directly based on piezocone penetration test (CPTU) data are presented and evaluated. Analyses and evaluation were conducted on three types piles that were failed during pile load testing. The CPT methods, as well as the CPTU methods, were used to estimate the load carrying capacities of the investigated piles (Qp ). Pile load test were used to determine the measured load carrying capacities (Qm). The pile capacities determined using the different methods were compared with the measured pile capacities obtained from the pile load tests. Two criteria were selected as bases of evaluation: the best fit line for Qp versus Qm and the arithmetic mean and standard deviation for the ratio Qp /Qm. Results of the analyses showed that the best methods for determining pile capacity are the CPTU methods.

scholarly journals Bi-Directional Static Load Tests of Pile Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 5492
Author(s):  
Michał Baca ◽  
Włodzimierz Brząkała ◽  
Jarosław Rybak
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Static Load ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Pile Capacity ◽  
Pile Shaft ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
S Curve ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Standard Tests ◽  
Static Load Testing

This work examined a new method of bi-directional static load testing for piles, referencing the Osterberg test. Measurements were taken, on a laboratory scale, using six models of piles driven into a box filled with sand. This method allowed for separate measurements of pile base and pile shaft bearing capacities. Based on the results, the total pile bearing capacity and equivalent Q–s diagrams were estimated. The results obtained show that the structure of the equivalent curve according to Osterberg is a good approximation of the standard Q–s curve obtained from load tests, except for loads close to the limit of bearing capacity (those estimates are also complicated by the inapplicability and ambiguity of a definition of the notion of limit bearing capacity); the equivalent pile capacity in the Osterberg method represents, on average, about 80% of the capacity from standard tests.

scholarly journals Static and Dynamic Load Tests of Shaft and Base Grouted Concrete Piles

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialin Zhou ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Hongsheng Jiang ◽  
Chunhao Lyu ◽  
Erwin Oh
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Load ◽  
Static Load ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Pile Capacity ◽  
Friction Resistance ◽  
Concrete Piles ◽  
Double Tangent ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Bored Piles ◽  
Comparison Of The Results

This paper examines shaft and base grouted concrete piles by conducting vertical static load tests (SLTs) and dynamic load tests. Three concrete piles with shaft and base grouting, with base grouting only, and without grouting techniques were selected, and compressive SLTs were conducted. Two piles with grouting were also assessed with dynamic load tests. Another two uplift SLTs were conducted to one shaft and base grouted pile and one pile without grouting. Traditional presentations were provided to check whether the bored piles reached the design requirement. Interpretations of test results were also provided to determine the ultimate pile capacity. Results from these 5 SLT programs indicated that double-tangent and DeBeer's methods are close to each other, and Chin's method overestimates the pile capacity. Comparison of the results from the SLTs and dynamic load tests shows that the results from Chin's method are close to dynamic results, and Mazurkiewicz's method overestimates for friction resistance. The results also demonstrate that base and shaft grouted pile and base grouted pile increase by 9.82% and 2.89% in compressive capacity, respectively, and compared to the uplift SLTs; there is a 15.7% increment in pile capacity after using base and shaft grouting technology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document