Corporate Governance Model for a higher education institution in the course of Distance Education

Author(s):  
Marcia Welita da Silva ◽  
Alessandro Marco Rossini
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Tomei

The phenomenon of distance-based learning has dramatically changed the direction and delivery of education in the past decade. Course Web sites, whether used as supplemental resources for face-to-face courses or as essential materials in an online course, have exploded since the mid-1990s. By the end of the millennium, higher education institution world-wide were racing to establish dominance on the distance education bandwagon.


2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Ghaleb A. El Refae ◽  
◽  
Abdelhafid K. Belarbi ◽  
Jamal A. Abu Rashed ◽  
◽  
...  

It is of paramount difficulty to capture the governance and management arrangements of a higher education institution. There is no unified model of university governance system. University governance depends on the type of property ownership, its management paradigm, and its set of goals and objectives. Under the auspices of internationalization of higher education and the fierce competition after the prevalence of higher education privatization، and the move of public higher education institutions to self-finance sustainability, the proposal for tracing out a system of university governance requires the detection of three elements: Governance of academics, business governance، and corporate governance. The first element treats the management of academic affairs. Business governance manages the measurement of the institution performance, while corporate governance manages the development of the institution organizational culture. The paper aims at analyzing the university governance of an Arab higher education institution, where the higher education system is witnessing reform policies in face of rising higher education globalization and a fierce competition in the higher education industry. The analysis is taken within a risk management approach.


2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Ghaleb A. El Refae ◽  
◽  
Abdelhafid K. Belarbi ◽  
Jamal A. Abu Rashed ◽  
◽  
...  

It is of paramount difficulty to capture the governance and management arrangements of a higher education institution. There is no unified model of university governance system. University governance depends on the type of property ownership, its management paradigm, and its set of goals and objectives. Under the auspices of internationalization of higher education and the fierce competition after the prevalence of higher education privatization، and the move of public higher education institutions to self-finance sustainability, the proposal for tracing out a system of university governance requires the detection of three elements: Governance of academics, business governance، and corporate governance. The first element treats the management of academic affairs. Business governance manages the measurement of the institution performance, while corporate governance manages the development of the institution organizational culture. The paper aims at analyzing the university governance of an Arab higher education institution, where the higher education system is witnessing reform policies in face of rising higher education globalization and a fierce competition in the higher education industry. The analysis is taken within a risk management approach.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Abambres

This work reports several issues found by the author throughout his professional career, concerning academic leadership. Topics like (i) out-of-field teaching/researching, and (ii) time management in faculty hiring or new role assignment, are addressed. Besides, the author describes which fundamental decisions he´d take if he could manage a higher education institution or academic department. The topics covered are crucial for the success of any higher education institution, such as (a) hiring, (b) social engagement, (c) student assessment, (d) open mindedness, (e) prompt communication, (f) passion in work, and (g) freedom / trust.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 56-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Lyalyuk ◽  
O. R. Tuchina

Educational system is the most important social institution, which provides the development of a personality and frames his/her worldview and the conception of subjective well-being. Despite the large number of studies on the issue of psychological and pedagogical security of educational environment, the sphere of higher education still remains underexplored. The available empiric material has not received sufficient methodological justification and conceptualization. This article aims to provide the conceptualization of the risk category as applied to the educational environment of a higher education institution, as well as empiric investigation of the risks within the educational environment as viewed by applicants and students.Materials and methods. 213 applicants and 547 students of the Kuban State Technological University took part in the survey. The following investigation methods were used: expert assessment, interview, questioning, content analysis, analysis of means method, cluster analysis and factor analysis.Investigation results. Comparative examination of the manifestation degree of risks within the educational environment as viewed by applicants and students of higher education institution showed significant differences in the assessment of risk by these groups of respondents. From the point of view of applicants, the main risks are connected with social and psychological aspects of the educational environment of a higher education institution, relations within student groups and interaction with teachers, as well as with the issues related to the educational management and leisure arrangement. As viewed by the students, the risks within the educational environment include external and social and psychological risk factors, motivating risks and risks arising from the learning process organization and management and the related issues. Applicants’ notion of the risks within the educational environment of a higher education institution was mainly influenced by information they received from media and by the opinion of their relatives and age mates.Consideration and conclusions. It was proved that the applicants’ idea of the risks within the educational environment of a higher education institution is determined by the opinion of people they know personally, however it changes during the process of studying in higher education institution and acquiring their own experience of being within the environment. The investigation results allow creating a model of psychological and pedagogical security within the educational environment of a higher education institution. This model makes it possible to forecast main risks of the educational environment, their development, and evolvement and find solution to them. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document