scholarly journals Survey of Current Practices: Peripheral Nerve Block Utilization by ED Physicians for Treatment of Pain in the Hip Fracture Patient Population

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Haslam ◽  
Andrew Lansdown ◽  
Jacques Lee ◽  
Martin Van der Vyver
2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nevenka Radic ◽  
Kristina Radinovic ◽  
Mihailo Ille ◽  
Aleksandar Lesic ◽  
Mirjana Ljubicic-Stojanovic ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hip fracture is a pathological condition, more common in older age, i.e. in people over 65 years. The prevalence of this disorder is continuously increasing, simultaneously with higher age limit. In evaluation of risk for operation and anesthesia, older age itself represents higher risk and calls for special attention. In selection of anesthesiological technique, it is more usual to apply neuroaxial block or peripheral nerve block, which is more advantageous over general anesthesia. CASE REPORT: A female, 80-year old, patient B.D. was admitted to hospital for hip fracture, with the diagnosis of the right, lateral, basicervical femoral fracture. On admission, heart decompensation (decompensated dilated myocardiopathy), pulmonary edema and the left lateral pleural effusion were established. Due to high risk (ASA III) of intraoperative and postoperative complications, it was decided to apply combined peripheral nerve block. Using the neurostimulators, 3-in-1 block, lumbosacral block and sciatic nerve block were applied. During the operation, the patient was sedated by Propofol and had spontaneous respiration through the laryngeal mask. Intra- and postoperatively, the patient?s hemodynamics was stable. Conclusion: Peripheral nerve blocks are safe and effective anesthesiological technique, which may reduce the mortality in patients with the hip fracture and maintain the hemodynamic stability, both during and after the surgical intervention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e239468
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Ishida ◽  
Fumiko Ogura ◽  
Satoko Kondo ◽  
Yoshie Toba

Hip fracture is a common injury in elderly patients. In Japan, the number of super-old patients—age >90 years—with hip fractures has increased drastically over time. Available strategies for anaesthetic management for hip fracture surgery include general anaesthesia, neuraxial anaesthesia and peripheral nerve block. However, general and neuraxial anaesthesia are often avoided for various reasons, particularly in elderly patients. In recent years, peripheral nerve block has proven effective in various surgical procedures. Additionally, dexmedetomidine exhibits neuroprotective effects and has been used safely in super-old patients. Herein, we demonstrate successful anaesthetic management with peripheral nerve block under dexmedetomidine sedation for open reduction and internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture in a 97-year-old patient.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2097240
Author(s):  
Anthony D Hade ◽  
Satomi Okano ◽  
Anita Pelecanos ◽  
Adrian Chin

Peripheral nerve blocks can provide surgical anaesthesia as well as excellent postoperative analgesia. When questioned postoperatively, however, some patients report low levels of satisfaction with their nerve block experience. At our hospital, patients undergoing regional anaesthesia have their patient characteristics, block characteristics and postoperative feedback routinely recorded in a block registry. We analysed data from 979 consecutive patients undergoing peripheral nerve block for orthopaedic surgery to identify factors associated with low levels of patient satisfaction. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with their peripheral nerve block (scale 1–5: 4–5 is ‘satisfied’, 1–3 is ‘not satisfied’). Eighty-nine percent (871/979) of patients reported being ‘satisfied’ with their block. Factors negatively associated with patient satisfaction were rebound pain (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.85 for moderate rebound pain; aOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.48 for severe rebound pain), discomfort during the block (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.82 for moderate discomfort; aOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.76 for severe discomfort) and pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.55 for pain ≥8/10). Only 24% (26/108) of patients who reported being ‘not satisfied’ stated that they would be unwilling to undergo a hypothetical future nerve block. Rebound pain of at least moderate intensity, procedural discomfort of at least moderate intensity and severe pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit are all negatively associated with patient satisfaction. Of these factors, rebound pain occurs most frequently, being present in 52% (403/777) of our respondents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document