scholarly journals The Application of Membrane Separation Processes as Environmental Friendly Methods in the Beet Sugar Production

10.5772/5306 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zita Seres ◽  
Julianna Gyura ◽  
Mirjana Djuric ◽  
Gyula Vatai ◽  
Matild Eszterle
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Separation ◽  
Sugar Production ◽  
Separation Processes ◽  
Environmental Friendly ◽  
Beet Sugar

Excellent environmental performance of beet sugar production in the Netherlands

2020 ◽  
pp. 161-165
Author(s):  
Bertram de Crom ◽  
Jasper Scholten ◽  
Janjoris van Diepen
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Land Use ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Environmental Impact ◽  
Water Consumption ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Cane Sugar ◽  
Sugar Production ◽  
Beet Sugar ◽  
Glucose Syrup

To get more insight in the environmental performance of the Suiker Unie beet sugar, Blonk Consultants performed a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study on beet sugar, cane sugar and glucose syrup. The system boundaries of the sugar life cycle are set from cradle to regional storage at the Dutch market. For this study 8 different scenarios were evaluated. The first scenario is the actual sugar production at Suiker Unie. Scenario 2 until 7 are different cane sugar scenarios (different countries of origin, surplus electricity production and pre-harvest burning of leaves are considered). Scenario 8 concerns the glucose syrup scenario. An important factor in the environmental impact of 1kg of sugar is the sugar yield per ha. Total sugar yield per ha differs from 9t/ha sugar for sugarcane to 15t/ha sugar for sugar beet (in 2017). Main conclusion is that the production of beet sugar at Suiker Unie has in general a lower impact on climate change, fine particulate matter, land use and water consumption, compared to cane sugar production (in Brazil and India) and glucose syrup. The impact of cane sugar production on climate change and water consumption is highly dependent on the country of origin, especially when land use change is taken into account. The environmental impact of sugar production is highly dependent on the co-production of bioenergy, both for beet and cane sugar.

Separation of Biologically Active Compounds by Membrane Operations

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoying Zhu ◽  
Renbi Bai
Keyword(s):  
Energy Consumption ◽  
Bioactive Compounds ◽  
Membrane Fouling ◽  
Membrane Separation ◽  
Separation Efficiency ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Separation Processes ◽  
Membrane Processes ◽  
Separation Technology ◽  
Pressure Driven

Background: Bioactive compounds from various natural sources have been attracting more and more attention, owing to their broad diversity of functionalities and availabilities. However, many of the bioactive compounds often exist at an extremely low concentration in a mixture so that massive harvesting is needed to obtain sufficient amounts for their practical usage. Thus, effective fractionation or separation technologies are essential for the screening and production of the bioactive compound products. The applicatons of conventional processes such as extraction, distillation and lyophilisation, etc. may be tedious, have high energy consumption or cause denature or degradation of the bioactive compounds. Membrane separation processes operate at ambient temperature, without the need for heating and therefore with less energy consumption. The “cold” separation technology also prevents the possible degradation of the bioactive compounds. The separation process is mainly physical and both fractions (permeate and retentate) of the membrane processes may be recovered. Thus, using membrane separation technology is a promising approach to concentrate and separate bioactive compounds. Methods: A comprehensive survey of membrane operations used for the separation of bioactive compounds is conducted. The available and established membrane separation processes are introduced and reviewed. Results: The most frequently used membrane processes are the pressure driven ones, including microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF). They are applied either individually as a single sieve or in combination as an integrated membrane array to meet the different requirements in the separation of bioactive compounds. Other new membrane processes with multiple functions have also been developed and employed for the separation or fractionation of bioactive compounds. The hybrid electrodialysis (ED)-UF membrane process, for example has been used to provide a solution for the separation of biomolecules with similar molecular weights but different surface electrical properties. In contrast, the affinity membrane technology is shown to have the advantages of increasing the separation efficiency at low operational pressures through selectively adsorbing bioactive compounds during the filtration process. Conclusion: Individual membranes or membrane arrays are effectively used to separate bioactive compounds or achieve multiple fractionation of them with different molecule weights or sizes. Pressure driven membrane processes are highly efficient and widely used. Membrane fouling, especially irreversible organic and biological fouling, is the inevitable problem. Multifunctional membranes and affinity membranes provide the possibility of effectively separating bioactive compounds that are similar in sizes but different in other physical and chemical properties. Surface modification methods are of great potential to increase membrane separation efficiency as well as reduce the problem of membrane fouling. Developing membranes and optimizing the operational parameters specifically for the applications of separation of various bioactive compounds should be taken as an important part of ongoing or future membrane research in this field.

Application of membrane separation processes in phosphorus recovery: A review

2021 ◽  
Vol 767 ◽  
pp. 144346
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Shuting Shen ◽  
Yuye Xu ◽  
Ting Guo ◽  
Hongliang Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Separation ◽  
Phosphorus Recovery ◽  
Separation Processes

The effectiveness of commercial antimicrobial compounds against saccharolytic microorganisms isolated from a beet sugar production line

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Arvanitis ◽  
Charalambos Z. Kotzamanidis ◽  
George N. Skaracis ◽  
Amalia D. Karagouni
Keyword(s):  
Production Line ◽  
Antimicrobial Compounds ◽  
Sugar Production ◽  
Beet Sugar

scholarly journals Analysis of ethanol dehydration using membrane separation processes

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Conde-Mejía ◽  
Arturo Jiménez-Gutiérrez
Keyword(s):  
Capital Investment ◽  
Membrane Separation ◽  
Biomass Pretreatment ◽  
Ethanol Dehydration ◽  
Purification Step ◽  
Silica Membrane ◽  
Separation Processes ◽  
Fermentation Processes ◽  
Vapor Permeation ◽  
Type Zeolite

AbstractAfter the biomass pretreatment and fermentation processes, the purification step constitutes a major task in bioethanol production processes. The use of membranes provides an interesting choice to achieve high-purity bioethanol. Membrane separation processes are generally characterized by low energy requirements, but a high capital investment. Some major design aspects for membrane processes and their application to the ethanol dehydration problem are addressed in this work. The analysis includes pervaporation and vapor permeation methods, and considers using two types of membranes, A-type zeolite and amorphous silica membrane. The results identify the best combination of membrane separation method and type of membrane needed for bioethanol purification.

Biofilms: their structure, activity, and effect on membrane filtration

2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Lewandowski ◽  
H. Beyenal
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Filtration ◽  
Membrane Separation ◽  
Separation Processes ◽  
Membrane Cleaning ◽  
Underlying Assumption ◽  
Structure Activity ◽  
Membrane Biofouling ◽  
Flux Decline ◽  
Cleaning Procedures ◽  
Near Future

The goal of this presentation is to identify biofouling mechanisms that cause undesirable effects to the membrane separation processes of flux decline and pressure drop. The underlying assumption of this presentation is that biofouling is unavoidable and that the operator cannot eliminate it entirely. This premise justifies research efforts toward understanding the mechanisms by which biofouling affects the membrane processes, rather than expecting that technology can entirely eliminate membrane biofouling in the near future. An improved understanding of biofouling mechanisms may lead to better membrane design, better membrane modules, and better membrane cleaning procedures.

APPLICATION OF ULTRASOUND IN MEMBRANE SEPARATION PROCESSES: A REVIEW

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shobha Muthukumaran ◽  
Sandra E. Kentish ◽  
Geoff W. Stevens ◽  
Muthupandian Ashokkumar
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Separation ◽  
Separation Processes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document