scholarly journals Oronasal Fistula: A Complication of Cleft Palate Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manal Abdalla Ali Eltahir
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Nasal Cavities ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Expected Outcomes

Oronasal fistula is one of the disappointing expected outcomes of cleft palate surgery. It may follow palatoplasty for palatal clefting patients, which is defined as an abnormal communication between the oral and nasal cavities. More than one system has attempted its classification. It may be a small and a symptomatic or symptomatic fistula that requires correction. Its rate differs widely according to many factors. Both surgical and non-surgical methods (the pros and cons of each should be considered) are available for its correction, and there are adjunctive therapies to assist in improving the surgical outcome.

Velar Closing Ratio As a Predictor for the Verlopharyngeal Function After Double Opposing Z-Plasty for Postpalatoplasty Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Cleft Palate

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562095408
Author(s):  
Cheng-Chun Wu ◽  
Faye Huang ◽  
Ching-Hua Hsieh ◽  
Chih-Pin Fu ◽  
Yi-Lin Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Background: This study was designed to identify the potential predictors of postoperative velopharyngeal function after double opposing Z-plasty (DOZP) for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients who had prior palatoplasty for cleft palate. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who received DOZP for VPI after receiving a prior palatoplasty treating cleft palate between 2004 and 2017. The speech outcome of patient was measured using the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (PWSS) at 6 months following surgery and determined the outcome suggests velopharyngeal competence (PWSS ≤2) or incompetence (PWSS >2). Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the variables for the prediction of competent surgical outcome. The specific receiver operating characteristic curves with an area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictor related to the surgical outcome as competence. Results: The study included 93 patients. Age, relative velar length, velar lengthening, and closure pattern were not significantly associated with postoperative competence status of the patient. The only variable that predicted a successful surgical outcome was preoperative velar closing ratio. However, the accuracy of velar closing ratio in predicting a competent surgical outcome is only moderate (AUC = 70.37). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that preoperative velar closing ratio may predict, with moderate accuracy, a successful surgical outcome in patients with postpalatoplasty VPI who undergo DOZP. Therefore, in patients with a low preoperative velar closing ratio, some alternative surgical methods other than DOZP may be considered to avoid unsatisfactory surgical outcome.

Patients With a History of Oronasal Fistula Repair Exhibit Lower Oral Health Measured With Patient-Centric Outcomes Measures

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562098133
Author(s):  
Alyssa Fritz ◽  
Diana S. Jodeh ◽  
Fatima Qamar ◽  
James J. Cray ◽  
S. Alex Rottgers
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Fistula Repair ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Oronasal fistulae following palatoplasty may affect patients’ quality of life by impacting their ability to eat, speak, and maintain oral hygiene. We aimed to quantify the impact of previous oronasal fistula repair on patients’ quality of life using patient-reported outcome psychometric tools. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 8- to 9-year-old patients with cleft palate and/or lip was completed. Patients who had a cleft team clinic between September 2018 and August 2019 were recruited. Participants were divided into 2 groups (no fistula, prior fistula repair). Differences in the individual CLEFT-Q and Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Short Form 19 (COHIP-SF 19) Oral Health scores between the 2 groups were evaluated using a multivariate analysis controlling for Veau classification and syndromic diagnosis. Results: Sixty patients with a history of cleft palate were included. Forty-two (70%) patients had an associated cleft lip. Thirty-two (53.3%) patients had no history of fistula and 28 (46.7%) patients had undergone a fistula repair. CLEFT-Q Dental, Jaw, and Speech Function were all higher in patients without a history of a fistula repair; however, none of these differences were statistically significant. The COHIP-SF 19 Oral Health score demonstrated a significantly lower score in the fistula group, indicating poorer oral health ( P = .05). Conclusions: One would expect that successful repair of a fistula would result in improved function and patient satisfaction, but the consistent trend toward lower CLEFT-Q scores and significantly increased COHIP-SF 19 Oral Health scores in our study group suggests that residual effects linger and that the morbidity of a fistula may not be completely treated with a secondary correction.

Is Risk of Secondary Surgery for Oronasal Fistula Following Primary Cleft Palate Repair Associated With Hospital Case Volume and Cost-to-Charge Ratio?

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-611
Author(s):  
Giap H. Vu ◽  
Christopher L. Kalmar ◽  
Carrie E. Zimmerman ◽  
Laura S. Humphries ◽  
Jordan W. Swanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Charge Ratio ◽  
Fistula Repair ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Secondary Surgery ◽  
Hospital Case ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective: This study assesses the association between risk of secondary surgery for oronasal fistula following primary cleft palate repair and 2 hospital characteristics—cost-to-charge ratio (RCC) and case volume of cleft palate repair. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: This study utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database, which consists of clinical and resource-utilization data from >49 hospitals in the United States. Patients and Participants: Patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair from 2004 to 2009 were abstracted from the PHIS database and followed up for oronasal fistula repair between 2004 and 2015. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome measure was whether patients underwent oronasal fistula repair after primary cleft palate repair. Results: Among 5745 patients from 45 institutions whom met inclusion criteria, 166 (3%) underwent oronasal fistula repair within 6 to 11 years of primary cleft palate repair. Primary palatoplasty at high-RCC facilities was associated with a higher rate of subsequent oronasal fistula repair (odds ratio [OR] = 1.84 [1.32-2.56], adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.81 [1.28-2.59]; P ≤ .001). Likelihood of surgery for oronasal fistula was independent of hospital case volume (OR = 0.83 [0.61-1.13], P = .233; AOR = 0.86 [0.62-1.20], P = .386). Patients with complete unilateral or bilateral cleft palate were more likely to receive oronasal fistula closure compared to those with unilateral-incomplete cleft palate (AOR = 2.09 [1.27-3.56], P = .005; AOR = 3.14 [1.80-5.58], P < .001). Conclusions: Subsequent need for oronasal fistula repair, while independent of hospital case volume for cleft palate repair, increased with increasing hospital RCC. Our study also corroborates complete cleft palate and cleft lip as risk factors for oronasal fistula.

Repair of Recurrent Cleft Palate with Free Vastus Lateralis Muscle Flap

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G. Christiano ◽  
Amir H. Dorafshar ◽  
Eduardo D. Rodriguez ◽  
Richard J. Redett
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Vastus Lateralis ◽  
Muscle Flap ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Vastus Lateralis Muscle ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Lateralis Muscle ◽  
Palate Repair

A 6-year-old girl presented with a large recalcitrant oronasal fistula after bilateral cleft lip and palate repair and numerous secondary attempts at fistula closure. Incomplete palmar arches precluded a free radial forearm flap. A free vastus lateralis muscle flap was successfully transferred. No fistula recurrence was observed at 18 months. There was no perceived thigh weakness. The surgical scar healed inconspicuously. Free flaps should no longer be considered the last resort for treatment of recalcitrant fistulas after cleft palate repair. A free vastus lateralis muscle flap is an excellent alternative, and possibly a superior option, to other previously described free flaps.

Do Oral Flora Colonize the Nasal Floor of Patients with Oronasal Fistulae?

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Brennan ◽  
Anthony F. Markus ◽  
Timothy R. Flood ◽  
Ian P. Downie ◽  
Rajvinder Uppal
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Statistical Correlation ◽  
Oral Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Isolates ◽  
Oral Flora ◽  
Relative Lack ◽  
Significant Growth ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Nasal Floor

Objective: To determine if oral bacteria colonize the cleft nasal floor in patients with unilateral oronasal fistula when compared with the unaffected nasal floor and whether the results obtained would be of benefit in assessing oronasal fistulae in the clinic. Design: Prospective study of 26 patients with cleft palate and unilateral oronasal fistula. Microbiological culture swabs were taken from the mouth and nasal floors of patients. The unaffected nasal floor was used as a control. Bacterial isolates were identified and compared in the laboratory by a senior microbiologist. Main Outcomes Measure: A significant growth of oral bacteria from the cleft nasal floor when compared with the unaffected nasal floor. Results: Four patients were excluded because no growth was found on any culture plate. In the remaining 22 cases, a light growth of oral flora was found in the cleft nasal floor in only 3 patients. No statistical correlation between culture of oral bacteria and the cleft nasal floor could be found (p = .12). Conclusions: The relative lack of colonization of the cleft nasal floor by oral bacteria may reflect poor transmission of bacteria through the fistula, competition with commensal nasal flora, or an inability of oral bacteria to survive in a saliva-depleted area. The investigation is not helpful in the assessment of oronasal fistulae in the clinic.

Cleft Palate

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksana A Jackson ◽  
Alison E Kaye ◽  
David W Low
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Speech Development ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Feeding Difficulties ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Impaired Speech

A cleft of the palate represents one of the most common congenital anomalies of the craniofacial region. Palatal clefting can occur in combination with a cleft of the lip and alveolus or as an isolated finding and can vary significantly in severity. The intact palate is a structure that separates the oral and nasal cavities, and the function of the palate is to close off the nasal cavity during deglutition and to regulate the flow of air between the nose and mouth during speech production. An unrepaired cleft palate can thus result in nasal regurgitation of food and liquid, early feeding difficulties, and impaired speech development. The goals of surgical repair are to restore palatal integrity by closing the cleft defect and repairing the musculature to allow for normal function during speech. The secondary goal of cleft palate repair is to minimize deleterious effects on growth of the palate and face, which can be impacted by standard surgical interventions. This review describes two of the most commonly performed cleft palate repair techniques in use today, as well as highlighting special anatomic considerations, summarizing perioperative care, and reviewing postoperative complications and their management. This review contains 11 figures, 2 videos, 3 tables and 63 references Key words: cleft, cleft team, Furlow, orofacial, oronasal fistula, palatoplasty, speech, submucous cleft, velopharyngeal insufficiency

Modified Von Langenbeck Cleft Palate Repair Using an Anterior Triangular Flap: Decreased Incidence of Anterior Oronasal Fistulas

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Lynn Stewart ◽  
David M. Fisher ◽  
Jaret L. Olson
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Anterior Margin ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Anterior Portion ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Triangular Flap ◽  
Secondary Palate ◽  
Nasal Side ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Hypernasal Speech

Objective: A complication following cleft palate surgery is the development of oronasal fistulas. Despite recent advances aimed at addressing this concern, rates of postoperative fistulas have remained unchanged and are reported at between 3% and 60%. Oronasal fistulas commonly occur between the hard and soft palate and at the anterior portion of the cleft. These fistulas lead to functional problems with nasal emission, hypernasal speech, and food regurgitation through the nose. For clefts of the secondary palate, we developed a modification of the Von Langenbeck technique in which an anterior triangular flap is used to decrease the incidence of postoperative fistulas. Method: A triangular flap composed of oromucosa was designed for isolated clefts of the secondary palate only. It is based at the anterior margin of the cleft and is used as a turnover flap to allow closure of the often very tight anterior nasal side. A retrospective chart analysis was performed from 2000 to 2007. All patients who had isolated clefts of the secondary palate and had undergone a modified Von Langenbeck procedure were included in the study. Patients were evaluated 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively for the presence of oronasal fistulas. Results: With the introduction of the anterior triangular flap, we show that 0 of 182 patients developed a postoperative oronasal fistula. Conclusions: This modification of the standard Von Langenbeck uses an anterior triangular flap and confers the advantage of assisting in nasal side closure of the anterior margin of the cleft; in doing so, it reduces the rate of fistula formation.

Oral Flora and Perioperative Antimicrobial Interventions in Cleft Palate Surgery: A Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562097736
Author(s):  
Miles J. Pfaff ◽  
Leila Musavi ◽  
Maxwell M. Wang ◽  
Christos S. Haveles ◽  
Claire Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Fistula Formation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Oral Flora ◽  
Oronasal Fistula ◽  
Perioperative Antibiotics ◽  
Antimicrobial Interventions ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Background: The role of perioperative antibiotics in cleft palate remains a topic of debate. Advocates stress their importance in preventing local and systemic infections and decreasing the incidence of oronasal fistula formation. However, few studies to date have directly evaluated the role of antibiotics and other antimicrobial measures in cleft palate surgery. Objective: The aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence surrounding the use of perioperative antibiotics and other antimicrobial interventions in cleft palate surgery. Additionally, we review the literature on the oral flora unique to the cleft palate patient population. Methods: This was accomplished utilizing PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library with MeSH and generic terms. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: This review highlights the lack of higher level evidence on perioperative antibiotic use and other antimicrobial interventions in cleft palatoplasty and calls for further research on the matter. Conclusions: The literature appears to support the use of preoperative antibiotics for cleft palatoplasty, but the benefits of prolonged postoperative antibiotic use remain questionable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document