scholarly journals Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Author(s):  
Anton Kasatkin ◽  
Aleksandr Urakov ◽  
Anna Nigmatullina
Choonpa Igaku ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-610
Author(s):  
Masahito MINAMI ◽  
Mayu TUJIMOTO ◽  
Ayako NISHIMOTO ◽  
Mika SAKAGUCHI ◽  
Yasuhiro OONO ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yu-Lin Hsieh ◽  
Meng-Che Wu ◽  
Jon Wolfshohl ◽  
James d’Etienne ◽  
Chien-Hua Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction This study is aimed to investigate the association of intraosseous (IO) versus intravenous (IV) route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from the database inception through April 2020. Our search strings included designed keywords for two concepts, i.e. vascular access and cardiac arrest. There were no limitations implemented in the search strategy. We selected studies comparing IO versus IV access in neurological or survival outcomes after OHCA. Favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge was pre-specified as the primary outcome. We pooled the effect estimates in random-effects models and quantified the heterogeneity by the I2 statistics. Time to intervention, defined as time interval from call for emergency medical services to establishing vascular access or administering medications, was hypothesized to be a potential outcome moderator and examined in subgroup analysis with meta-regression. Results Nine retrospective observational studies involving 111,746 adult OHCA patients were included. Most studies were rated as high quality according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results demonstrated no significant association between types of vascular access and the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–1.33; I2, 95%). In subgroup analysis, time to intervention was noted to be positively associated with the pooled OR of achieving the primary outcome (OR: 3.95, 95% CI, 1.42–11.02, p: 0.02). That is, when the studies not accounting for the variable of “time to intervention” in the statistical analysis were pooled together, the meta-analytic results between IO access and favourable outcomes would be biased toward inverse association. No obvious publication bias was detected by the funnel plot. Conclusions The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between types of vascular access and neurological outcomes at hospital discharge among OHCA patients. Time to intervention was identified to be an important outcome moderator in this meta-analysis of observation studies. These results call for the need for future clinical trials to investigate the unbiased effect of IO use on OHCA CPR.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C.R. Rippey ◽  
Pablo Blanco ◽  
Peter J. Carr

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Resnick ◽  
Rita Cydulka ◽  
Robert Jones

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Phelan ◽  
Chuck Emerman ◽  
William F. Peacock ◽  
Mathew Karafa ◽  
Nora Colburn ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (19) ◽  
pp. S30-S38
Author(s):  
Nancy Moureau ◽  
Gilbert Gregory E.

Background The purpose of this study was to investigate ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (UGPIV) supply usage practices by clinicians working in vascular access, in emergency departments (EDs), or in other roles. Methodology In 2019, a voluntary cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted via SurveyMonkey. Data collected included demographics, practice-oriented information, procedural activities, and supplies used for UGPIV insertions. Frequency distributions and results of Fisher's exact test and one-way analysis of variance were reported using R v.3.5.2. Results A total of 26,649 surveys were distributed with a response rate of 5.5% (n = 1475). Forty-eight percent of respondents (n = 709) indicated that they worked in a vascular access role, 310 (21%) worked in an ED, and 455 (31%) categorized their role as other. Clinically meaningful differences existed in all variables for UGPIV procedures and supplies between departments (P < 0.0001) and in all care settings. Using an investigatorconstructed overall metric of supplies used, important differences were demonstrated between personnel supply use in vascular access roles and other roles (P < 0.0001) and personnel in EDs and other roles (P < 0.0001). Conclusions Use of supplies for UGPIV insertions varies by department. The variability in supply usage for UGPIV insertions revealed by this survey suggests a need for clinical education on guideline application and evaluation of compliance with policies to promote standardization of supplies for UGPIV insertion.


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. S28-S29
Author(s):  
P. Loeffler ◽  
A.M. Kuchinski ◽  
E. Zevallos ◽  
R.D. Gordon ◽  
M. Lyon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document