scholarly journals Machine Learning, Compositional and Fractal Models to Diagnose Soil Quality and Plant Nutrition

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léon Etienne Parent ◽  
William Natale ◽  
Gustavo Brunetto

Soils, nutrients and other factors support human food production. The loss of high-quality soils and readily minable nutrient sources pose a great challenge to present-day agriculture. A comprehensive scheme is required to make wise decisions on system’s sustainability and minimize the risk of crop failure. Soil quality provides useful indicators of its chemical, physical and biological status. Tools of precision agriculture and high-throughput technologies allow acquiring numerous soil and plant data at affordable costs in the perspective of customizing recommendations. Large and diversified datasets must be acquired uniformly among stakeholders to diagnose soil quality and plant nutrition at local scale, compare side-by-side defective and successful cases, implement trustful practices and reach high resource-use efficiency. Machine learning methods can combine numerous edaphic, managerial and climatic yield-impacting factors to conduct nutrient diagnosis and manage nutrients at local scale where factors interact. Compositional data analysis are tools to run numerical analyses on interacting components. Fractal models can describe aggregate stability tied to soil conservation practices and return site-specific indicators for decomposition rates of organic matter in relation to soil tillage and management. This chapter reports on machine learning, compositional and fractal models to support wise decisions on crop fertilization and soil conservation practices.

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (spe) ◽  
Author(s):  
Regiane Kazmierczak ◽  
Neyde Fabíola Balarezo Giarola ◽  
Flávia Biasso Riferte ◽  
Josiane Burkner dos Santos ◽  
Alisson Marcos Fogaça ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 96-101

Quantification of soil organic carbon cycling as impacted by soil and crop man- agement practices is required for C storage and soil quality improvement investi- gations. This study assessed the short-term effect of conventional tillage (CT) and No-Tillage (NT) practices on SOC sequestration and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta). The experiment was conducted simultaneously at two lo- cations (06◦52' N, 07◦15' E and 06◦ 26' N; 07◦16' E) in southeast Nigeria. A Ran- domized Complete Block Design with five replications and four treatments com- prised of CT and NT, respectively, with 150 and 300 Kg ha-1 of NPK 15:15:15, was used. Soil quality attributes were measured at two soil depths (0-20 cm and 20-40 cm) in both locations and analyzed. The results indicated that the quantity of carbon sequestered in the soil at 0-20 cm soil depth for both sites was 46.7- 90.9 and 65.0-117.9 Mg ha-1, respectively, for the two planting seasons in NT plots treated with 300 Kg ha-1 of NPK. This was followed by NT plots treated with 150 Kg ha-1 of NPK, which sequestered 55.5-86.2 and 46.7-91.9 Mg ha-1 SOC. CT plots that received 300 Kg ha-1 NPK with 11.3-47.6 Mg/ha SOC had 44% and 28% lower stored SOC when compared to NT, NPK 150 Kg ha-1 plots for the two-planting season respectively. This indicates that CT practices signifi- cantly limit SOC sequestration. CT with 300 Kg of NPK 15:15:15 gave the high- est corm yield, followed by No-till with 300 Kg ha-1. A better edaphic condition provided by CT was compensated for by higher doses of N fertilizer in NT Plots.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihai Yang ◽  
Ning Yin ◽  
Amin William Mugera ◽  
Yumeng Wang

PurposeThis paper analysed survey data of 715 rice-producing households in China to assess the determinants of adoption of five mutually exclusive soil conservation practices (SCPs) and their impact on rice yield and chemical fertiliser use.Design/methodology/approachThe multinomial endogenous treatment effects model was used to account for selection bias and endogeneity arising from both observed and unobserved heterogeneity.FindingsFarms that adopted SCPs as a package experienced an increase in rice yield and decrease in chemical fertiliser use. Adoption of SCPs as a package led to a 12.0% increase in yield and 15.2% decrease in chemical fertiliser use; these results have policy implications for the non-point source pollution control in the agricultural sector. In contrast, adoption of straw retention only significantly reduced yield by 4.9% and increased chemical fertiliser use by 18.1%.Originality/valueThe authors evaluate and compare multi-type of SCPs, such as straw retention, deep tillage and use of organic fertiliser, separately or in combination, and their impacts on smallholder farmers’ rice yield and chemical fertiliser usage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandan Singha

AbstractThis study evaluates the effects of vegetative soil conservation practices (afforestation and/or bamboo planting) on farm profit and its components, revenue and variable cost. Since farmers self-select themselves as adopters of conservation measures, there could be a problem of selection bias in evaluating their soil conservation practices. We address the selection bias by using propensity score matching. We also check if there exists spatial spillover in adoption of vegetative conservation measures and how it affects matching. We use primary survey data from the Darjeeling district of the Eastern Himalayan region for the year 2013. Our results suggest strong spatial correlation. We find that the propensity score estimated from the spatial model provides better matches than the non-spatial model. While the results show that vegetative soil conservation can lead to significant gains in revenue, it also increases costs so that no significant gains in profit accrue to farmers.


Agrosearch ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
F.O. Oladipo ◽  
O. Bolarin ◽  
A.K. Daudu ◽  
A.O. Kayode ◽  
P.O. Awoyele

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document