scholarly journals Differential Diagnosis of Renal Tumors With Clear Cytoplasm: Clinical Relevance of Renal Tumor Subclassification in the Era of Targeted Therapies and Personalized Medicine

2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajen Goyal ◽  
Elizabeth Gersbach ◽  
Ximing J. Yang ◽  
Stephen M. Rohan
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumor ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immunohistochemical Stains

Context.—The World Health Organization classification of renal tumors synthesizes morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings to define more than 40 tumor types. Of these, clear cell (conventional) renal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in adults and—with the exception of some rare tumors—the most deadly. The diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma on morphologic grounds alone is generally straightforward, but challenging cases are not infrequent. A misdiagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma has clinical consequences, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies. Objective.—To highlight morphologic mimics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and provide strategies to help differentiate clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other renal tumors and lesions. The role of the pathologist in guiding treatment for renal malignancies will be emphasized to stress the importance of proper tumor classification in patient management. Data Sources.—Published literature and personal experience. Conclusions.—In challenging cases, submission of additional tissue is often an inexpensive and effective way to facilitate a correct diagnosis. If immunohistochemical stains are to be used, it is best to use a panel of markers, as no one marker is specific for a given renal tumor subtype. Selection of limited markers, based on a specific differential diagnosis, can be as useful as a large panel in reaching a definitive diagnosis. For renal tumors, both the presence and absence of immunoreactivity and the pattern of labeling (membranous, cytoplasmic, diffuse, focal) are important when interpreting the results of immunohistochemical stains.

scholarly journals Economic Burden of Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma for French Patients Treated With Targeted Therapies

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e227-e234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiphaine Cholley ◽  
Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin ◽  
Samuel Limat ◽  
Marion Hugues ◽  
Fabien Calcagno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

scholarly journals Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from other Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes and Benign Oncocytoma Using Quantitative MDCT Enhancement Parameters

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 569
Author(s):  
Claudia-Gabriela Moldovanu ◽  
Bianca Petresc ◽  
Andrei Lebovici ◽  
Attila Tamas-Szora ◽  
Mihai Suciu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Enhancement Ratio ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Masses

Background and objectives: The use of non-invasive techniques to predict the histological type of renal masses can avoid a renal mass biopsy, thus being of great clinical interest. The aim of our study was to assess if quantitative multiphasic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) enhancement patterns of renal masses (malignant and benign) may be useful to enable lesion differentiation by their enhancement characteristics. Materials and Methods: A total of 154 renal tumors were retrospectively analyzed with a four-phase MDCT protocol. We studied attenuation values using the values within the most avidly enhancing portion of the tumor (2D analysis) and within the whole tumor volume (3D analysis). A region of interest (ROI) was also placed in the adjacent uninvolved renal cortex to calculate the relative tumor enhancement ratio. Results: Significant differences were noted in enhancement and de-enhancement (diminution of attenuation measurements between the postcontrast phases) values by histology. The highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.976 (95% CI: 0.924–0.995) and 0.827 (95% CI: 0.752–0.887), respectively, were demonstrated between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary RCC (pRCC)/oncocytoma. The 3D analysis allowed the differentiation of ccRCC from chromophobe RCC (chrRCC) with a AUC of 0.643 (95% CI: 0.555–0.724). Wash-out values proved useful only for discrimination between ccRCC and oncocytoma (43.34 vs 64.10, p < 0.001). However, the relative tumor enhancement ratio (corticomedullary (CM) and nephrographic phases) proved useful for discrimination between ccRCC, pRCC, and chrRCC, with the values from the CM phase having higher AUCs of 0.973 (95% CI: 0.929–0.993) and 0.799 (95% CI: 0.721–0.864), respectively. Conclusions: Our observations point out that imaging features may contribute to providing prognostic information helpful in the management strategy of renal masses.

Decreased prolyl hydroxylase 3 mRNA expression in oncocytomas compared with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 80-86
Author(s):  
Spyridon Kampantais ◽  
Ilias Kounatidis ◽  
Vasiliki Kotoula ◽  
Ioannis Vakalopoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Gkagkalidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Prolyl Hydroxylase ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Fresh Frozen

Introduction: Hypoxia inducible factors (HIF) and prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) enzymes play a central role in tumor progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, there are currently no data regarding the behavior of this pathway (HIF/PHD) in a large number of benign renal tumors, the oncocytomas. The aim of the present study was to compare the expression levels of these factors between ccRCC and oncocytoma tumors. Material and methods: A total of 56 fresh frozen specimens from patients with ccRCC and 14 oncocytoma specimens were analyzed via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in order to assess the expression levels of HIF-1α, HIF-2α, PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3. The analysis involved both fresh frozen tumor samples as well as adjacent normal kidney tissues. Results: In ccRCC, HIF-1α and HIF-2α levels were upregulated in 65.5% and 71.4% of cases, respectively. PHD3 was downregulated only in 15.4% of the ccRCC cases, in contrast with oncocytoma cases, which exhibited low expression levels in the majority. The upregulation of PHD3 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in ccRCC when compared with oncocytoma was statistically significant ( P<0.001). No other comparisons (HIF-1α, HIF-2α, PHD1, and PHD2) were significantly different. HIF-2α and PHD3 mRNA expression levels were negatively correlated with Fuhrman Grade ( P=0.029 and P=0.026, respectively) in ccRCC. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the HIF/PHD pathway was compared between ccRCC and a common benign tumor, identifying the upregulation of PHD3 as the possible underlying factor guiding the difference in the behavior of ccRCC.

scholarly journals Unilateral synchronous papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a case report with KRAS and PIK3CA mutations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Jung Lee ◽  
Dong Hoon Shin ◽  
Joon Young Park ◽  
So Young Kim ◽  
Chung Su Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Renal Neoplasm ◽  
Reverse Polarity ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Exon 2

Abstract Background: The presence of histologically different neoplasms in the same organ is rare in pathologic practice. We report the first case of synchronous clear cell renal cell carcinoma (clear cell RCC) and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) with comprehensive immunohistochemical and molecular characterization using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Case presentation: A 61-year-old man was incidentally found to have a left renal mass on imaging studies performed for workup of left back pain and urine color change for one week. A laparoscopic left radical nephrectomy was performed. Gross examination showed lobulated masses measuring 5.6 × 4.0 × 3.3 cm in the upper to mid pole and 1.1 × 1.0 × 1.0 cm in the lower pole. Microscopic findings revealed these to be two different separate masses of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. NGS analyses revealed KRAS gene mutation (c.35G>T/p.G12V in exon 2) in the papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, with PIK3CA gene mutation restricted to the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (c.1624G>A/p.E542K in exon 10).Conclusions: We report here an extraordinarily rare case of synchronous renal tumors of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We identified simultaneous KRAS and PIK3CA mutations in two different renal masses in the same kidney for the first time. New pathologic assessment with comparative molecular analysis of mutational profiles may be helpful for tumor studies.

scholarly journals Similarities and Differences between Clear Cell Tubulo-Papillary and Conventional Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Phenotypical and Mutational Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Francesca Giunchi ◽  
Tania Franceschini ◽  
Elisa Gruppioni ◽  
Annalisa Altimari ◽  
Elisa Capizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Clear cell tubulo-papillary renal cell carcinoma (cctpRCC) is characterized by clear cell morphology, but differs from conventional clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC) for its indolent clinical behavior and genetic background. The differential diagnosis between the two is based on histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: We performed a comparative case-control histological, IHC, and genetic analysis by next generation sequencing (NGS), to point out the differences in 10 cases of cctpRCC, and six controls of ccRCC with low stage and grade. Results: All 16 cases showed the IHC profile with cytokeratin 7, racemase, and carbonic anhydrase IX expected for the histological features of each tumor type. By contrast, the NGS mutation analysis that covered 207 amplicons of 50 oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes provided conflicting results. Among the 10 cctpRCC cases, eight (80%) were wild type for all of the genes in the panel, while two (20%) harbored VHL mutations typical of ccRCC. Three of the six (50%) ccRCC control cases showed expected VHL mutations; two (33%) harbored pathogenic mutations in the p53 or the CKIT genes; and one (16%) was wild type. Conclusion: We can assume that histology and ICH are not sufficient for a definitive diagnosis of cctpRCC or ccRCC. Although with a panel covering 50 genes, we found that 80% of cctpRCC were genetically silent; thus, suggesting an indolent biology of these tumors. The differential diagnosis between ccptRCC and ccRCC for the choice of the best therapeutic strategy likely requires the comprehensive evaluation of histology, IHC, and at least VHL mutations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document