scholarly journals La libertad de información como límite al derecho a la protección de datos personales: la excepción periodística

2015 ◽  
pp. 377
Author(s):  
Cristina Pauner Chulvi
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Freedom Of Information ◽  
Member States ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Personal A ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Right

La aplicación indiscriminada de la normativa sobre el derecho a la protección de datos de carácter personal a los medios de comunicación puede suponer una restricción excesiva de la libertad de información, uno de los elementos más característicos del patrimonio jurídico de las sociedades democráticas. En el intento de lograr un equilibrio entre ambos derechos fundamentales, el régimen europeo en materia de protección de datos —la actual Directiva 95/46/CE y la Propuesta de Reglamento General de Protección de Datos— contemplan la denominada excepción periodística que autoriza a los Estados miembros a establecer limitaciones a la aplicación de determinadas disposiciones. El presente artículo analiza el concepto y alcance de la mencionada excepción en las normas europeas y en las legislaciones de los Estados miembros que, en transposición de la Directiva, han incorporado el reconocimiento de la excepción periodística.Indiscriminate application to the media of the rules on the right to data protection may cause excessive restriction of freedom of information, one of the most characteristic items of the legal heritage of democratic societies. In an attempt to strike a balance between the two fundamental rights, the European legal framework for the protection of personal data — the current Directive 95/46/EC and the proposed General Data Protection Regulation — provide for the so-called journalism exemption which allows Member States to establish exemptions to the application of certain provisions. This article analyses the concept and scope of this exemption in the European regulations and in the legislation of the Member States which have transposed the Directive into their national law and have thus incorporated recognition of the journalism exemption.

scholarly journals Personal Data Protection in Russia

2020 ◽  
pp. 95-113
Author(s):  
Alexander Gurkov
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Special Role ◽  
State Control ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Personal Data Protection ◽  
General Data

AbstractThis chapter considers the legal framework of data protection in Russia. The adoption of the Yarovaya laws, data localization requirement, and enactment of sovereign Runet regulations allowing for isolation of the internet in Russia paint a grim representation of state control over data flows in Russia. Upon closer examination, it can be seen that the development of data protection in Russia follows many of the steps taken at the EU level, although some EU measures violated fundamental rights and were invalidated. Specific rules in this sphere in Russia are similar to the European General Data Protection Regulation. This chapter shows the special role of Roskomnadzor in forming data protection regulations by construing vaguely defined rules of legislation.

scholarly journals Data Portability and Data Control: Lessons for an Emerging Concept in EU Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1359-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Graef ◽  
Martin Husovec ◽  
Nadezhda Purtova
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Data Control ◽  
Data Portability ◽  
The Right

AbstractThe right to data portability (RtDP) introduced by Article 20 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) forms a regulatory innovation within EU law. The RtDP provides data subjects with the possibility to transfer personal data among data controllers, but has an impact beyond data protection. In particular, the RtDP facilitates the reuse of personal data that private companies hold by establishing a general-purpose control mechanism of horizontal application. Article 20 of the GDPR is agnostic about the type of use that follows from the ported data and its further diffusion. We argue that the RtDP does not fit well with the fundamental rights nature of data protection law, and should instead be seen as a new regulatory tool in EU law that aims to stimulate competition and innovation in data-driven markets.What remains unclear is the extent to which the RtDP will be limited in its aspirations where intellectual property rights of current data holders—such as copyright, trade secrets andsui generisdatabase rights—cause the regimes to clash. In such cases, a reconciliation of the interests might particularly confine the follow-on use of ported data again to specific set of socially justifiable purposes, possibly with schemes of fair remuneration. Despite these uncertainties, the RtDP is already being replicated in other fields, namely consumer protection law and the regulation of non-personal data. Competition law can also facilitate portability of data, but only for purpose-specific goals with the aim of addressing anticompetitive behavior.We conclude that to the extent that other regimes will try to replicate the RtDP, they should closely consider the nature of the resulting control and its breadth and impact on incentives to innovate. In any case, the creation of data portability regimes should not become an end in itself. With an increasing number of instruments, orchestrating the consistency of legal regimes within the Digital Single Market and their mutual interplay should become an equally important concern.

scholarly journals Data protection for networked and robotic toys - a legal perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocco Panetta ◽  
Federico Sartore
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Codes Of Conduct ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Psychological Maturity ◽  
Iot Devices

This paper is aimed to understand the state of the art and the resulting consequences of the legal framework in Europe, with regard to the protection of children's data. Especially when they interact with networked and robotic toys, like in 'My friend Cayla' case. In order to evaluate the practical implications of the use of IoT devices by children or teenager users, the first part of the paper presents an analysis of the international guiding principles of the protection of minors, a category which enjoys a higher level of protection of their fundamental rights, due to their condition of lack of physical and psychological maturity. Secondly, the focus is moved upon the protection of personal data of children. Only after confronting previous data protection legal instruments and having compared them with the novelties set forth in General Data Protection Regulation, it is reasonable to assume that new provisions such as "privacy by design" principle, adequacy of security measures and codes of conduct, can support data controllers in ensuring compliance (in line with the accountability principle) in the field of IoT toys. In conclusion, the paper supports a view of Data Protection Authorities as a relevant player in enhancing these renovated tools in order to achieve the protection of children's rights, as to ensure their substantial protection against the threats of the interconnected world.

scholarly journals THE INFLUENCE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES ON THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EPIDEMIC COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-104
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Heredero Campo
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Present Moment ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Self Image ◽  
Personality Rights ◽  
General Data ◽  
The Right

SUMMARY Legislators legislate as needs arise; it is the present moment and society itself, through its demands, which sets the path and provides them with the keys as to what matters to legislate on and what aspects need to be developed in greater detail. Contemporary societies try, with greater or lesser success, to adapt to the changes that are taking place, both those reflected in daily customs and habits, and those related to the generation, dissemination and use of information and knowledge. Today's society consumes and handles an excessive volume of information and data, often without assessing its veracity or analysing the source from which it comes, without considering the importance of the data it provides at any given time, and much less thinking about the consequences that misuse of such data may have for privacy, for example. These are issues that, despite being the order of the day, have already given cause for concern. A fact that is reflected in an increasingly prolix jurisprudence. An example of this, as we will have the opportunity to point out below, is the SAN of 6 April 2018, which, with regard to the problems that arise in relation to medical records, highlights the importance of defending the right to the protection of personal data and the need to obtain consent in an appropriate manner. In these times of pandemic, it is important to seek a suitable approach and to know some fundamental aspects of the aforementioned right to data protection, starting from such extremely important concepts as: personal data or consent itself. Moreover, the development of this right, so much questioned lately due to the use of COVID applications, in terms of the possible effects on privacy or image, or any of the controversies that are arising around data protection in the management of the coronavirus, almost forces us to think about its limits. In this respect, we must bear in mind that many of the answers to the questions that are being raised about the problems associated with current practices lie in the legitimising bases of data processing. In this study, I conclude that despite the great importance of some personality rights, including privacy, honour or self-image, and among which is the right to data protection, the right that deserves the greatest protection is the right to life. Let us not forget that the function of law is to serve the person to whom the reason for its existence must be attributed. KEY WORDS Law and New Technologies; Data Protection; Fundamental Rights; Personality Rights; Data Protection; Right to privacy; Right to honour; Right to image; General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR); Organic Law on Data Protection and Guarantee of Digital Rights (LOPDyGDD); COVID-19 (Coronavirus).

Article 28—Protection of Personal Data

2021 ◽  
pp. 414-414
Author(s):  
Eleonora Rosati
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Family Life ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Data Set ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Charter Of Fundamental Rights ◽  
General Data ◽  
The Right ◽  
Copyright Directive

This chapter looks at the provisions of Article 28 of Directive 2019/790, the European copyright directive in the Digital Single Market. It outlines the processing of personal data that is carried out within the framework of Directive 2019/790 and in compliance with Directive 2002/58/EC and Regulation (EU) 2016/679. It also demonstrates the processing of personal data that should respect fundamental rights, including the right to the protection of personal data. The chapter clarifies that the processing of personal data must be done in respect of the fundamental rights to private and family life and protection of personal data set out in Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. It discusses the protection of personal data pursuant to ePrivacy Directive 2002/58 and General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679.

scholarly journals THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN: An analysis from an American perspective and what it means for the U.S. to adopt it

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ani Kristo
Keyword(s):  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Data Infrastructure ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
American Perspective ◽  
The Right ◽  
The U.S

Today’s society is part of a shared digital life, with an Internet population of 3.2 billion people. Though this colossal data infrastructure enables communication, information sharing, and collaboration, it is a place that favors a paradigm of continuous collection and storage of data, without much analysis of how that disrupts certain social norms and induces cases of violations of fundamental rights like privacy, freedom, and protection from discrimination.In 2016, the European Union adopted the General Data Protection Regulation, which introduced a right for individuals to have their personal data erased. This opened a discussion on privacy and identity concerns in the context of perpetual stigmatization and discrimination due to obsolete data that remains on the web. Through analyses of some cases in the U.S. and E.U., this paper will investigate the challenges of importing a similar legal framework for the erasure of personal data in the U.S., while ensuring the freedom of expression and maintaining the quality of the search engines and respective websites.

scholarly journals Toward Compatibility of the EU Trade Policy with the General Data Protection Regulation

AJIL Unbound ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
Svetlana Yakovleva ◽  
Kristina Irion
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Charter Of Fundamental Rights ◽  
Strong Position ◽  
General Data ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Eu

The European Union's (EU) negotiating position on cross-border data flows, which the EU has recently included in its proposal for the World Trade Organization (WTO) talks on e-commerce, not only enshrines the protection of privacy and personal data as fundamental rights, but also creates a broad exception for a Member's restrictions on cross-border transfers of personal data. This essay argues that maintaining such a strong position in trade negotiations is essential for the EU to preserve the internal compatibility of its legal system when it comes to the right to protection of personal data under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EU Charter) and the recently adopted General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

scholarly journals Artificial intelligence, Digital Single Market and the proposal of a right to fair and reasonable inferences: a legal issue between ethics and techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-91
Author(s):  
Alexandre Veronese ◽  
Alessandra Silveira ◽  
Amanda Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
European Union ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Single Market ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
The European Union ◽  
European Union Law ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation

The article discusses the ethical and technical consequences of Artificial intelligence (hereinafter, A.I) applications and their usage of the European Union data protection legal framework to enable citizens to defend themselves against them. This goal is under the larger European Union Digital Single Market policy, which has concerns about how this subject correlates with personal data protection. The article has four sections. The first one introduces the main issue by describing the importance of AI applications in the contemporary world scenario. The second one describes some fundamental concepts about AI. The third section has an analysis of the ongoing policies for AI in the European Union and the Council of Europe proposal about ethics applicable to AI in the judicial systems. The fourth section is the conclusion, which debates the current legal mechanisms for citizens protection against fully automated decisions, based on European Union Law and in particular the General Data Protection Regulation. The conclusion will be that European Union Law is still under construction when it comes to providing effective protection to its citizens against automated inferences that are unfair or unreasonable.

scholarly journals The GDPR as Global Data Protection Regulation?

AJIL Unbound ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric Ryngaert ◽  
Mistale Taylor
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Data Protection Directive ◽  
Protection Legislation ◽  
General Data ◽  
Global Data ◽  
The Eu

The deterritorialization of the Internet and international communications technology has given rise to acute jurisdictional questions regarding who may regulate online activities. In the absence of a global regulator, states act unilaterally, applying their own laws to transborder activities. The EU's “extraterritorial” application of its data protection legislation—initially the Data Protection Directive (DPD) and, since 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—is a case in point. The GDPR applies to “the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to: (a) the offering of goods or services . . . to such data subjects in the Union; or (b) the monitoring of their behaviour . . . within the Union.” It also conditions data transfers outside the EU on third states having adequate (meaning essentially equivalent) data protection standards. This essay outlines forms of extraterritoriality evident in EU data protection law, which could be legitimized by certain fundamental rights obligations. It then looks at how the EU balances data protection with third states’ countervailing interests. This approach can involve burdens not only for third states or corporations, but also for the EU political branches themselves. EU law viewed through the lens of public international law shows how local regulation is going global, despite its goal of protecting only EU data subjects.

EU Data Protection Law: The Review of Directive 95/46/EC and the General Data Protection Regulation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hustinx
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Gradual Development ◽  
Charter Of Fundamental Rights ◽  
General Data ◽  
Data Protection Law ◽  
The Difference

This chapter looks at the origins and the current state of EU data protection law, and highlights the context of the ongoing review of Directive 95/46/EC as its key instrument, as well as the main lines of the proposed General Data Protection Regulation which will replace the Directive in the near future. The analysis shows a gradual development along two lines: one aiming at stronger rights in order to provide more effective protection, and one ensuring more consistent application of those rights across the EU. It also demonstrates the increasing impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, both in the case law of the Court of Justice and in the review of the legal framework. At the same time, it is argued that a lack of awareness of the difference in character between Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter could prevent Article 8 from reaching its full potential.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document