Attitudes of prospective elementary school teachers toward mathematics and three other subject areas

1968 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-175
Author(s):  
Robert B. Kane

Studies of attitudes toward learning and teaching mathematics have been reported throughout a period of extensive curriculum revision. Dutton (1951, 1954, 1956, 1962, as c ited in the bibliography) developed scales to asess a ttitudes of prospective elementary teachers and children toward arithmetic. When he compared the responses to his scales in 1954 and 1962, he concluded that no significant changes in the a ttitude of prospective e lementa ry teachers and children toward arithmetic had occurred between those two years. Smith (1964) later administe red the Dutton scales to prospective elementary teachers. When he compared his results with Dutton's of 1954, he found that the 1964 group was more favorably inclined toward arithmetic than the 1954 group. Smith based th is conclusion on the results of the subject's self-rated feelings toward arithmetic as indicated on an e leven-point scale from “strongly against” to “strongly in favor.” Of Smith's subjects, 88.6 percent declared themselves either neutral or favorable toward arithmetic, compared with 79.5 percent of Dutton's subjects.

1971 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-214
Author(s):  
Henry Van Engen

Events in the past ten years have made it necessary and desirable for colleges and universities to increase their course requirements in mathematics for elementary school teachers. There has been little or no opposition to this trend except as one finds it in individual colleges when there is a proposal to change course requirements. In mathematics the change has been in the direction of doubling or trebling the number of credits in mathematics required of prospective elementary teachers.


1960 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-140
Author(s):  
Clarence Phillips

Colleges and Universities have the responsibility of training prospective elementary teachers in the teaching of elementary mathematics. These teachers must be trained so that they can teach elementary school mathematics for meaning and understanding. In addition to training prospective elementary school teachers, the colleges and universities also have the responsibility of acquainting teachers in-service with the “newer” approach in teaching elementary mathematics. In this article, I will use “elementary teachers” as including both groups.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-134
Author(s):  
Ángel López ◽  
Encarnación Castro ◽  
María C. Cañadas

Este trabajo forma parte de una investigación centrada en la divisibilidad en Z+. Los sujetos participantes son maestros en formación. Uno de los objetivos de la investigación consiste en caracterizar los significados que muestran los maestros en formación sobre el concepto de múltiplo. Este artículo recoge los resultados obtenidos en relación con dicho objetivo. Analizamos las producciones escritas de 37 maestros en formación obtenidas en una sesión práctica de aula, diseñada y desarrollada en el contexto de un experimento de enseñanza. Realizamos la caracterización de los significados a través de los elementos del análisis didáctico: estructura conceptual, sistemas de representación y fenomenología. Los maestros en formación mostraron mayoritariamente tres significados de múltiplo: producto, relación y dividendo en una división exacta. Characterizing the meaning of multiple by pre-service elementary school teachers This paper is part of a wider study focused on divisibility. Participants were prospective elementary teachers. One of the aims of the research is to characterize the meanings of multiple shown by prospective teachers. In this paper, we present the results concerning this aim. We analyse the productions of 37 prospective elementary teachers collected in a practice session, designed and developed in the context of a teaching experiment. We characterize the meanings through the following elements of the didactic analysis: conceptual structure, representation systems and phenomenology. Prospective teachers showed mostly three meanings of multiple: product, relationship and dividend in an exact division.Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/39495WOS-ESCI


Author(s):  
Gabriela Valverde ◽  
Encarnación Castro

We present the findings of a study on prospective elementary teachers’ proportional reasoning. After describing some of the teachers’ performance in solving multiplicative structure problems that involve ratios and relations of direct proportionality between quantities, we were able to establish classifications of their answers according to various categories of proportional reasoning.Razonamiento proporcional de futuros maestros de educación primariaPresentamos los resultados de un estudio sobre el razonamiento proporcional de futuros maestros de educación primaria. Describimos las actuaciones manifestadas por un grupo de estudiantes de magisterio de la Universidad de Granada al resolver problemas de estructura multiplicativa que involucran razones y relaciones de proporcionalidad directa entre cantidades. Encontramos que sus respuestas se clasifican en distintas categorías de razonamiento proporcional.Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/21533Nº de citas en WOS (2017): 2 (Citas de 2º orden, 1)Nº de citas en SCOPUS (2017): 1 (Citas de 2º orden, 0)


1963 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-211
Author(s):  
Jerry Shryock

What mathematical topics are appropriate for study in a background course for prospective elementary teachers of arithmetic? Are mathematics educators in agreement as to which topics should be introduced in such a course? Are textbooks suitable for such a course currently available? The intended purpose of this report is to answer these and related questions.


1974 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 436-438
Author(s):  
Barker Bausell ◽  
William B. Moody

The rationale for teaching mathematics to prospective elementary school teachers is quite straightforward. A teacher must obviously have some knowledge of the discipline's subject matter in order to insure adequate learning on the part of instructed students. This is normally accomplished by requiring the elementary education major to take a prescribed number of courses dealing with concepts deemed relevant to the elementary mathematics curriculum. The problem with this procedure is that the college textbook writer must himself arbitrarily decide which concepts are relevant and which are not. The purpose of the present article is to propose a procedure for teaching mathematics to propective teachers that avoids much of this arbitrariness.


1968 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-371
Author(s):  
Carol Kipps

Today there is widespread concern for helping e leme nta ry school teachers acquire new mathematical knowledge. This is reflected in the vast number of inservice programs being conducted across the country. As yet, however, there has been no gene ral agreement on important goals or reasonable levels of achievement to be expected after a series of prescribed in-service experiences. Characteristically there has been no attempt to find out how much of the new mathematics curricula elementary school teachers understand.


1985 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Loye Y. (Mickey) Hollis

It was probably not a unique experience, but it sure was fun, and more important, fifteen elementary school teachers improved their skills for teaching mathematics and did away with some anxiety about the subject. While they were about it, these teachers also increased the achievement in mathematics of forty-five elementary school students and showed them that mathematics can be a lot of fun.


1976 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-174
Author(s):  
Donald R. Kerr

Elementary school teachers, preservice or inservice, are not usually given the background in geometry that they need. Some college courses for elementary teachers contain no study of geometry. Those courses that do contain geometry may be limited to traditional topics in measurement, some terminology, and certain facts concerning familiar geometric shapes; or they may review the definitions, theorems, and proofs that the teacher has already had in high school. Judging on hearsay, experience, and an analysis of current mathematics texts for teachers, few courses are providing the teacher with what is needed.


1991 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
Sue Goldstein ◽  
Frances A. Campbell

“I never seem to reach every student when I am teaching mathematics.” “There is never enough time for practicing mathematics skills.” These laments by typical elementary school teachers are both real and abundant. Teachers would love to have more time and more help to work with students individually on developing and mastering mathematics skills. Involving parents in working with their children in mathematics is a ready method of obtaining an extra resource for teachers when individualizing mathematics instruction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document