Do the Standards Go Far Enough? Power, Policy, and Practice in Mathematics Education

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Apple
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Educational Reform ◽  
Mathematical Knowledge ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Conservative Movement ◽  
Evaluation Standards

Although NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) are generating considerable interest, there has been little discussion of their ideological and social grounding and effects. By placing the Standards within the growing conservative movement in education, this paper raises a number of crucial issues about the documents, including the depth of the financial crisis in education and its economic and ideological genesis and results; the nature of inequality in schools; the role of mathematical knowledge in our economy in maintaining these inequalities; the possibilities and limitations of a mathematics curriculum that is more grounded in students' experiences; and the complicated realities of teachers' lives. Without a deeper understanding of these issues, the Standards will be used in ways that largely lend support only to the conservative agenda for educational reform.

Activating Assessment Alternatives in Mathematics

1992 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Teaching Program ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Pencil And Paper ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Assessment Strategies

The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989, 1, 2) emphasizes the role of evaluation “in gathering information on which teachers can base their subsequent instruction.” This strong sense of assessment's informing instructional practice is also evident in the materials arising from the Australian Mathematics Curriculum and Teaching Program (Clarke 1989: Lovitt and Clarke 1988, 1989). Both projects offer their respective mathematics-education communities a set of goal much broader than those traditionally conceived for mathematics instruction. The adoption of these goals by mathematics teachers and school systems demands the use of new assessment strategies if the restructuring of the mathematics curriculum and mathematics-teaching practice is to be effected. Mathematics education must not restrict itself to those goals that can be assessed only through conventional pencil-and-paper methods.

Professional Development: Teachers' Communication and Collaboration Keys to Student Achievement

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 454-458
Author(s):  
Helene J. Sherman ◽  
Thomas Jaeger
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Student Achievement ◽  
Educational Reform ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Professional Satisfaction ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Instructional Changes

The curriculum and evaluation standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) have served as both stimuli for, and responses to, numerous formal and informal programs, conferences, and conversations calling for educational reform and improvement in mathematics teaching. After all the plans are drawn and all the objectives are written, however, reform is most likely to occur and make a lasting difference when teachers are aware of the need for improvement, have a voice in planning it, and derive a real sense of professional satisfaction from implementing the instructional changes.

Implementing the “Curriculum and Evaluation Standards”: Recognizing and Recording Reform in Mathematics: New Questions, Many Answers

1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-193
Author(s):  
Joan Ferrini-Mundy ◽  
Loren Johnson ◽  
James R. Smart
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Anecdotal Evidence ◽  
Reform Effort ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Curriculum And Pedagogy ◽  
Standards Documents

NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and its Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) lend possible direction and meaning to the reform effort in mathematics education that is sweeping the country. The documents have been widely disseminated and discussed, and anecdotal evidence indicates that teachers of mathematics are seeking ways to enact the ideas contained in the standards documents. These documents are also inspiring the development of standards in other disciplines. But a number of questions are being raised as schools, districts, states, and provinces attempt to incorporate these Standards in changing their curriculum and pedagogy.

Soundoff: Make Room for Dancing

1995 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Larry E. Askins
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Mathematics Teachers ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Clear Vision

As mathematics teachers, we are eager for an optimistic view of what our classrooms can become during this decade and beyond. I believe that NCTM's Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) and Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) present a clear vision for making mathematics education successful in the 1990s. However, the documents mean nothing if individual teachers fail to take deliberate steps toward realizing that vision.

Implementing The Standards: The Vision of Problem Solving in the Standards

1990 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Patricia F. Campbell ◽  
Honi J. Bamberger
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Small Groups ◽  
Mathematical Knowledge ◽  
Curriculum And Instruction ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Focused Attention ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematics Standards ◽  
Widespread Acceptance

Problem solving has been espoused as a goal in mathematics education since the late 1970s, with focused attention ansmg from NCTM's An Agenda for Action (1980). But problem solving should be more than a slogan offered for its appeal and widespread acceptance. It should be a cornerstone of mathematics curriculum and instruction, fostering the development of mathematical knowledge and a chance to apply and connect previously constructed mathematical understandings. This perception of problem solving is presented in the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards) (NCTM 1989, 23, 75). See table 1. Indeed, as noted in the Standards, “students need to work on problems that may take hours, days, and even weeks to solve. Although some may be relatively simple exercises to be accompplished independently, others should involve small groups or an entire class working cooperatively” (NCTM 1989, 6).

Assessment: Describing Student Performance Qualitatively

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 828-835
Author(s):  
Jinfa Cai ◽  
Maria E. Magone ◽  
Ning Wang ◽  
Suzanne Lane
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
National Council ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Reasoning Problem ◽  
Mathematics Educators

The issue of linking testing with instructional practice is not new. In recent years, mathematics educators have been redefining the goals of mathematics education to include increased attention to problem solving and reasoning. For example, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) and the National Research Council's Everybody Counts (1989) suggest an emphasis on reasoning, problem solving, conceptual understanding, and communicating mathematically.

Mathematics Textbook as an Object of Research/Matematički udžbenik kao predmet istraživanja

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dubravka Glasnović Gracin
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Mathematical Knowledge ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Mathematics Textbooks ◽  
Mathematics Textbook ◽  
Mathematics Book

AbstractA mathematics textbook can be described as an officially authorized and pedagogically designed mathematics book written to provide mathematical knowledge to students. This description suggests the authority of the textbook - because it has been authorized by an administrative source and because it deals with authorized knowledge. This paper provides an overview of research on mathematics textbooks. The emphasis is on questions concerning the extent to which and how textbooks are used in mathematics education in Croatia and in the world.Research results show that mathematics textbooks are widely used in mathematics education worldwide. This finding points to the need for research on the content and structure of textbooks. Such studies are combined with the associated results on how textbooks are used in the classroom and which methods teachers apply in using textbooks in mathematics education. The results of the empirical studies show that teachers use textbooks for lesson preparation and pupils use mathematics textbooks for exercises to a great extent. These results imply that such an important role of textbooks in mathematics education deserves additional attention, with the goal of understanding and improving mathematics education.Key words: mathematics education; overview; research on textbook---SažetakMatematički udžbenik može se opisati kao službeno autorizirana i pedagoki osmiljena matematička knjiga napisana s ciljem da učenicima ponudi matematičke sadržaje. Taj opis sugerira autoritet udžbenika jer ga je autorizirao administrativni izvor i jer sadrži autorizirano znanje. Ovaj članak daje pregled istraživanja matematičkih udžbenika, a naglasak je na pitanjima u kojoj mjeri i kako se udžbenici koriste u nastavi matematike u Hrvatskoj i u svijetu.Rezultati raznih istraživanja pokazuju da se udžbenici u velikoj mjeri koriste u nastavi matematike irom svijeta. Taj nalaz ukazuje na potrebu za istraživanjem sadržaja i strukture matematičkih udžbenika. Uz to, prikazani su rezultati istraživanja o tome na koji se način udžbenici koriste u razredu i koje metode nastavnici prakticiraju prilikom upotrebe udžbenika na nastavi. Rezultati empirijskih studija pokazuju da nastavnici udžbenike većinom koriste za pripremu nastavnog sata, a učenici udžbenike koriste u najvećoj mjeri za vježbanje. Ti rezultati ukazuju na to da tako važna uloga udžbenika u matematičkom obrazovanju zaslužuje dodatnu pažnju s ciljem razumijevanja i poboljanja nastave matematike.Ključne riječi: istraživanje udžbenika; nastava matematike; pregled.

One Point of View: Reclaiming School Mathematics

1990 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Portia Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Design Change

The framers of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) call for a radical “design change” in all aspects of mathematics education. They believe that “evaluation is a tool for implementing the Standards and effecting change systematically” (p. 189). They warn, however, that “without changes in how mathematics is assessed, the vision of the mathematics curriculum described in the standards will not be implemented in classrooms, regardless of how texts or local curricula change” (p. 252).

IMPLEMENTING THE “PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHING MATHEMATICS”: The Role of Reflection in Teaching

1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
Lynn C. Hart ◽  
Karen Schultz ◽  
Deborah Najee-ullah ◽  
Linda Nash
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Practices ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics

I do not believe it b possible for teachers to change their teaching practices if those practices arc not made the object of thought and consideration.

Implementing The Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics: Linking Teaching, Learning, and Assessment

1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 550-552
Author(s):  
Jeane M. Joyner
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Mathematical Knowledge ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Other Information ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Analysis Of Teaching

The sixth standard in the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) focuses on analyzing and interconnecting teaching and learning. The standard calls for the analysis of teaching and learning to be ongoing by “[o]bserving, listening to, and gathering other information about students to assess what they are learning.” Teachers examine the “[e]ffects of the tasks, discourse, and learning environment on students' mathematical knowledge, skills, and dispositions.”

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document