New Programs

1971 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 627-628

The IMS program for teaching mathematics was developed by the Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia (RELCV) and is designed for mathematics instruction for students in grades 1-6. The South Carolina State Department of Education has been instrumental in appraising the appropriate-ness of the program and coordinating the efforts of the South Carolina schools and the Laboratory in the pilot use of these materials.

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Dukes ◽  
Sharon M. Darling ◽  
Kristina Bielskus-Barone

A review of State Department of Education and school district websites was conducted to determine how policy related to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) was communicated to teachers of students with severe disabilities. Four states were selected: California, New York, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. State Department of Education websites and three local school districts within each state were chosen for review using locale codes to ensure representation of city, suburban, and rural districts. A total of 16 websites were analyzed using an original instrument designed to capture information about CCSS implementation efforts. Results indicate that there is little information about students with severe disabilities or instructional/pedagogical guidance for teachers in regard to the CCSS on these sites. Thus, it may be difficult for teachers, based on this sample of websites, to translate standards into educational programming for students.


PMLA ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 70 (4-Part2) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  

The Accompanying table gives the most recent data obtainable on the extent to which foreign languages are offered and studied in public secondary schools in the United States. The last national survey was made by the U. S. Office of Education in 1948–49, and comparisons are made with the results of this survey to show the subsequent gain or loss in each state for which more recent figures could be obtained. For some states the data are incomplete because the state department of education does not know, and apparently does not care to find out, what the pupils in the high schools are currently studying. In seventeen states, the information existed only on reports filed by each high school, and it was assembled through the help of foreign language teachers who went to the state department of education and spent days tabulating the reports.


1981 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-294
Author(s):  
Don Wells

This article examines a survey and analysis of 41 State Department of Education definitions of gifted and talented. A conceptual framework of components is presented as a means of definition analysis. Definitions are examined and discussed in relation to those characteristic components. Current trends in definitions are placed in an historical context revealing the expansion and refinement of expansion components in definitions for the gifted and talented. The definition issue is discussed in relation to societal values and expectations as they pertain to gifted individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document