The Pond: Doing Research Together

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 696-704
Author(s):  
Kevin Kinneavy

Interdisciplinary approaches to teaching all subjects are central to the middle school concept. Such approaches can be especially useful for teaching mathematics, a subject that has traditionally been the bane of many students' existence. The NCTM recognizes the importance of interdisciplinary instruction in its Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989, 84).

1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-191

Have you ever thought of exploring geometric relationships on the computer? The NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) challenges us to pay increased attention to “developing an understanding of geometric objects and relationships” and “using geometry in solving problems” (p.70). The document also advises placing decreased emphasis on memorizing geometric vocabulary, facts, and relationships. This article describes several geometric investigations that were developed in the spirit of the curriculum standards and are appropriate for use at advanced elementary and middle school levels, as well as with older students. They encourage exploration, creativity, and discovery.


1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-442
Author(s):  
Azita Manouchehri ◽  
Mary C. Enderson ◽  
Lyle A. Pugnucco

The study of geometry in grades 5-8 should incorporate opportunities for students to engage in exploring and analyzing geometric shapes to conjecture about geometric relationships through data collection and model construction, according to the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989). In this fashion, students will develop an intuitive understanding of geometric concepts and learn to reason formally and informally. Moreover, it is hoped that through such processes, students will formulate relevant definitions and theorems. The Standards document also encourages the use of computer technologies in middle school mathematics instruction. This suggestion was based on the assumption that interactive environments provided by appropriate geometry software have the potential to foster students' movement from concrete expetiences with mathematics to more formal levels of abstractions, nurture students' conjectuting spirit, and improve their mathematical thinking. Although the NCTM's visions for the geometry curriculum and for methods of teaching geometry in the middle levels are certainly attractive, many teachers are concerned about what software is useful for the middle school population, how such software can be used in instruction. what issues are associated with their use, and what the consequences are of learning and teaching mathematics within such environments.


1991 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
Madeleine J. Long ◽  
Meir Ben-Hur

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and Professional Srandards for Teaching Mathematics (1989) endorse the view that assessment should be made an integral part of teaching. Although many of the student outcomes described in the Srandards cannot properly be assessed using paper-and-pencil tests, such tests remain the primary assessment tools in today's classroom.


1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-51
Author(s):  
Janet Parker ◽  
Connie Carroll Widmer

As we prepare for the day envisioned by the Curriculum ond Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989), when every student will have a calculator and every class will have at least one computer available at all times, we need to reexamine the roles of computation, estimation, and mental mathematics in the teaching and practice of mathematics. It is true that calculators and computers can perform virtually all computations, relieving us and our students of much drudgery; however, this is not their only role. Calculators and computers also make it easy for us to solve problems in a new mode, T-E-M-T-T: trial, error, and modified trial through technology.


1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (8) ◽  
pp. 602-606
Author(s):  
Ruth McClintock

Viewing mathematics as communication is the second standard listed for all grade levels in the NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989). This emphasis underscores the need for nurturing language skills that enable children to translate nonverbal awareness into words. One way to initiate discussion about mathematical concepts is to use physical models and manipulatives. Standard 4 of the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) addresses the need for tools to enhance discourse. The flexigon is a simple and inexpensive conversation piece that helps students make geometric discoveries and find language to share their ideas.


1993 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-248
Author(s):  
J. Michael Shaughnessy

This issue introduces a new department to the Mathematics Teacher, “Connecting Research to Teaching.” Articles will focus on mathematical and pedagogical ideas related to the NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards (1989) and the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991). Authors will strive to present information to help teachers (1) understand students' conceptions or misconceptions of important ideas, (2) consider various approaches to teaching, and (3) offer activities that probe students' understanding. Although research offers no one correct answer to the many perplexing problems surrounding teaching and learning mathematics, the suggestions and perspectives may help teachers pursue their work with new insights. It is hoped that the department will also stimulate researchers to reflect on connecting research to the classroom. Communication and collaboration between teachers and researchers will benefit both groups and help each grow in appreciation of the other's tasks.


1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 454-458
Author(s):  
Helene J. Sherman ◽  
Thomas Jaeger

The curriculum and evaluation standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) have served as both stimuli for, and responses to, numerous formal and informal programs, conferences, and conversations calling for educational reform and improvement in mathematics teaching. After all the plans are drawn and all the objectives are written, however, reform is most likely to occur and make a lasting difference when teachers are aware of the need for improvement, have a voice in planning it, and derive a real sense of professional satisfaction from implementing the instructional changes.


1995 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 694-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian R. Hirsch ◽  
Arthur F. Coxford ◽  
James T. Fey ◽  
Harold L. Schoen

Current policy reports addressing mathematics education in American schools, such as Everybody Counts (NRC 1989), Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989), Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991), and Assessment Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1995), call for sweeping reform in curricular, instructional, and assessment practices. Implementing the proposed reforms poses new opportunities and challenges for school districts, mathematics departments, and classroom teachers.


1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-205
Author(s):  
Deborah E. Schifter ◽  
Deborah Carey O'Brien

Since the publication of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991). such phrases as “mathematics should be taught for understanding.” “teachers should facilitate the construction of mathematical concepts,” and “classrooms should be student centered” have become identified with a reformed mathematics pedagogy.


1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 37-39
Author(s):  
Deborah A. Butler ◽  
Thomas S. Dickinson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document