Learning to Solve Problems in Primary Grades

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 426-432
Author(s):  
Phyllis Whitin ◽  
David J. Whitin

Problem solving lies at the heart of mathematical learning. Children need opportunities to write, discuss, and solve problems on a regular basis (NCTM 2000). The problems must incorporate grade-appropriate content and be “accessible and engaging to the students, building on what they know and can do” (Lester and Charles 2003, p. xi). Teachers also play a key role in establishing a classroom environment that encourages children to solve problems in different ways and develop habits of mind that include persistence, risk taking, and a questioning attitude (Whitin and Whitin 2003). This article describes how a class of second- and third-grade students learned to create and solve their own problems.

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn S. Fuchs ◽  
Douglas Fuchs ◽  
Karin Prentice ◽  
Carol L. Hamlett ◽  
Robin Finelli ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha K. Jitendra ◽  
Cynthia C. Griffin ◽  
Priti Haria ◽  
Jayne Leh ◽  
Aimee Adams ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha K. Jitendra ◽  
Michael Rodriguez ◽  
Rebecca Kanive ◽  
Ju-Ping Huang ◽  
Chris Church ◽  
...  

This intervention study compared the efficacy of small-group tutoring on the mathematics learning of third-grade students at risk for mathematics difficulty using either a school-provided standards-based curriculum (SBC) or a schema-based instruction (SBI) curriculum. The SBI curriculum placed particular emphasis on the underlying mathematical structure of additive problems to represent and solve word problems. At-risk students ( N = 136) from 35 classrooms scoring below a proficiency level on their district accountability assessment were assigned randomly to treatment groups. Results indicated interaction effects on the word problem-solving (WPS) posttest and retention tests such that SBI students with higher incoming (pretest) WPS scores outperformed SBC students with higher pretest scores, whereas SBC students with lower pretest scores outperformed SBI students with lower pretest scores. No effects were found on number combinations automaticity, and mathematics and reading achievement. Implications to improve the problem-solving performance of at-risk students are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document