Effectiveness of Inflatable Lumbar Support (ILS) for the Prevention of Short Term Backache among Post-operative Female Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia

Background. In recent years, various methods of combined anesthesia during abdominal surgery have been introduced into clinical practice.Aim. To demonstrate the possibilities of a combination of high prolonged spinal anesthesia and endotracheal anesthesia during abdominal surgery.Materials and methods. A clinical case of combined use of high prolonged spinal anesthesia and endotracheal anesthesia in a 48-year-old patient with a tumor in the right half of the ascending part of the right half of the colon is presented.Results. The patient received a puncture of the spinal space at a standard point and was installed a spinal catheter in the cranial direction for 3 cm. An isobaric solution of marcaine in the initial dose of 20 mg was injected into the catheter. The regulation of the development of the block was regulated by the inclination of the head end of the table by 60°. After that endotracheal anesthesia was performed on the basis of fentanyl and propofol. This combination allowed to expand the scope of surgical intervention, provided adequate pain relief intraoperatively and in the postoperative period, without the use of narcotic analgesics. With the appearance of signs of recovery of pain sensitivity, intraoperatively or in the postoperative period, re-introduction of the anesthetic into the spinal catheter was performed in half of the initial dose with liquor barbotage. In the early postoperative period, the patient was on strict bed rest with a head end of the bed raised at 30–45°. The method provides complete segmental blockade and muscle relaxation in the area of operation, stability of central hemodynamics during surgery and in the postoperative period.Conclusion. This type of anesthesia is more easily tolerated by patients, accompanied by early awakening and extubation, characterized by stability of central hemodynamics, reduced risk of complications, the possibility of prolonging anesthesia with lower doses of narcotic analgesics in the intraoperative period, providing high-quality anesthesia in the postoperative period without resorting to the use of narcotic analgesics.

Download Full-text

Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-020-02113-1 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mirhasan Rahimli ◽

Aristotelis Perrakis ◽

Vera Schellerer ◽

Andrew Gumbs ◽

Eric Lorenz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Abdominal Surgery ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Liver Surgery ◽

Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Short Term ◽

Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery ◽

Previous Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Background Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). Methods Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m2. The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. Conclusion Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.

Download Full-text

Preoperative biological therapy and short-term outcomes of abdominal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Gut ◽

10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301495 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 62 (3) ◽

pp. 387-394 ◽

Cited By ~ 82

Author(s):

Matti Waterman ◽

Wei Xu ◽

Amreen Dinani ◽

A Hillary Steinhart ◽

Kenneth Croitoru ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽

Abdominal Surgery ◽

Bowel Disease ◽

Biological Therapy ◽

Short Term ◽

Inflammatory Bowel

Download Full-text

Thermoregulatory response in female patients during lower abdominal surgery in the head-down tilt position

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica ◽

10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04471.x ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 40 (4) ◽

pp. 475-479 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

M. Hirose ◽

Y. Hara ◽

J. Iwasa ◽

M. Matsusaki

Keyword(s):

Abdominal Surgery ◽

Thermoregulatory Response ◽

Female Patients

Download Full-text

Impact of nerve stimulator-guided obturator nerve block on the short-term outcomes and complications of transurethral resection of bladder tumour: A prospective randomized controlled study

Canadian Urological Association Journal ◽

10.5489/cuaj.3149 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 9 (11-12) ◽

pp. 780 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Deniz Bolat ◽

Ozgu Aydogdu ◽

Zeki Tuncel Tekgul ◽

Salih Polat ◽

Tarik Yonguc ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Anesthesia ◽

Bladder Wall ◽

Lateral Wall ◽

Adductor Muscle ◽

Obturator Nerve ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Nerve Stimulator ◽

Short Term ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Obturator Nerve Block

Introduction: In this prospective randomized controlled study, we investigated the efficacy of obturator nerve block (ONB) on adductor muscle spasm and related short-term outcomes and complications in patients who underwent transurethral resection of lateral wall-located bladder tumours (TURBT).Methods: Between July 2014 and February 2015, 70 patients scheduled to undergo TUR of lateral bladder wall tumours were enrolled in the study. All patients were preoperatively evaluated by cystoscopy and imaging tools and selected according to localized tumours on the lateral bladder wall. Patients were randomly allocated to Group SA (35 patients who underwent only spinal anesthesia) and Group ONB (35 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia combined with ONB by the nerve stimulator). An independent observer, blinded to the approach, evaluated the obturator signs, including adductor muscle contraction, bladder perforation, and completeness of the resection during the TURBT procedure.Results: The differences between groups regarding mean operation time, tumour size, and number were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Adductor muscle contraction was detected in 40% of patients in Group SA and 11.4% in Group ONB. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.021). Complete bladder perforation was detected in 2 patients in Group SA, whereas no perforation was observed in Group ONB. There was no case of severe bleeding in both groups. Conclusions: We found that ONB performed after spinal anesthesia was effective in preventing intraoperative complications due to adductor muscle spasm while performing TURBT. Our study limitations include its small sample size, since we only enrolled patients with primary lateral wall-localized bladder tumo

Download Full-text