Assessment of water quality and zooplankton population of canal water in western U.P.

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Madhu ◽  
Archana Arya ◽  
Neera Singh
2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 2069-2078 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. M. Schets ◽  
J. H. van Wijnen ◽  
J. F. Schijven ◽  
H. Schoon ◽  
A. M. de Roda Husman

ABSTRACT The water in the canals and some recreational lakes in Amsterdam is microbiologically contaminated through the discharge of raw sewage from houseboats, sewage effluent, and dog and bird feces. Exposure to these waters may have negative health effects. During two successive 1-year study periods, the water quality in two canals (2003 to 2004) and five recreational lakes (2004 to 2005) in Amsterdam was tested with regard to the presence of fecal indicators and waterborne pathogens. According to Bathing Water Directive 2006/7/EC, based on Escherichia coli and intestinal enterococcus counts, water quality in the canals was poor but was classified as excellent in the recreational lakes. Campylobacter, Salmonella, Cryptosporidium, and Giardia were detected in the canals, as was rotavirus, norovirus, and enterovirus RNA. Low numbers of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts were detected in the recreational lakes, despite compliance with European bathing water legislation. The estimated risk of infection with Cryptosporidium and Giardia per exposure event ranged from 0.0002 to 0.007% and 0.04 to 0.2%, respectively, for occupational divers professionally exposed to canal water. The estimated risk of infection at exposure to incidental peak concentrations of Cryptosporidium and Giardia may be up to 0.01% and 1%, respectively, for people who accidentally swallow larger volumes of the canal water than the divers. Low levels of viable waterborne pathogens, such as Cryptosporidium and Giardia, pose a possible health risk from occupational, accidental, and recreational exposure to surface waters in Amsterdam.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2699-2703
Author(s):  
A. N. Laghari ◽  
Z. A. Siyal ◽  
M. A. Soomro ◽  
D. K. Bangwar ◽  
A. J. Khokhar ◽  
...  

This study was conducted on the canal water that flows besides an urea manufacturing facility. The study focused to evaluate the impact of facility’s effluents. The canal water quality is being affected drastically due to heavy load of pollutants discharged. Samples were collected by grab sampling method, from various locations. These samples were analyzed regarding physiochemical parameters, i.e. temperature, pH, TDS, TSS, BOD5, COD, heavy metals (Fe, Cu, Cr, Mn) and NH3 content. The canal water quality deteriorates after receiving a substantial load of effluents discharged from urea fertilizer plant. The results compared with WHO and NEQS, showed that the effluent samples had alkaline nature with a high level of ammonia and BOD5 and are not safe for aquatic life and environment. It is therefore recommended that discharge of untreated effluents should be stopped, or allowed within safe limits.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5281-5287 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Mahessar ◽  
S. Qureshi ◽  
A. L. Qureshi ◽  
K. Ansari ◽  
G. H. Dars

The demand and supply of safe water is a basic need. The consumption of clean water intensified with population growth and economic development which in turn cause degradation of available freshwater resources while creating huge volumes of wastewater, solid waste, and serious environmental problems. This paper presents the impact of disposing of domestic/industrial effluents into an irrigation canal. The subsequent contamination of the canal water becomes a public health risk. The non-perennial Phuleli canal with a discharge of 15,026 cusecs, takes in water from the left bank of Kotri Barrage, which is the last controlling hydraulic structure on the Indus River. This canal runs from the periphery of Hyderabad, Tando Muhammad Khan (TM Khan) and Matli cities and supplies water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial activities. The canal water is the only source of drinking water for millions of people because the groundwater in the command area of the canal is highly saline. The banks on both sides of the canal have encroached in cities’ areas. The huge volume of solid waste and municipal and industrial wastewater from these cities and from the occupied canal banks are dumped directly into the canal without any treatment. The collected samples’ were analyzed for pH, EC, TDS, Cl, SO4, HCO3, hardness, Na, K, Ca, and Mg. These results show higher than permissible limits as per NEQS and WHO. The Karl Pearson matrix correlation of parameters reveals strong relation among EC with TDS and CL with SO4, Mg with K and moderated relationship among the other parameters except for pH and DO. Water Quality Index (WQI) model indicates that the water quality of the canal is poor and unfit for drinking. Hence the consumption of canal water is a high potential health risk for locals.


2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Pharino ◽  
K. Hasegawa-Kurisu ◽  
K. Hanaki

A water quality improvement with financial model was developed to investigate total benefits over costs and relative competency of different wastewater management approaches for recovering pollution overloaded canals in the center of Bangkok, Thailand. Implementation of centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment systems was evaluated within five different scenarios. Three major improvement mechanisms for open-canal water quality were considered including removal of wastewater loads, dilution by reclaimed water, and self-purification. Percent improvement of water quality within each canal is ranging from 40-84 % if centralized system was implemented vs. 41-88% if decentralized system was implemented. Estimated benefit/cost ratio from water improvement in centralized system, centralized with redistribution/reuse water system, and decentralized system are 2.28, 2.05, and 2.30 respectively. The results show that decentralized approach provides no significant difference in the benefit over cost ratio compared to centralized system, but offer slightly better in canal quality improvement. Therefore, decentralized wastewater management can be a promising alternative to promote sustainable uses of water and can work in help with centralized system. In the future, co-existing of large-scaled centralized and small-scaled decentralized systems may increasingly need to improve net efficiency of wastewater management where there are site specific problems with financial and political constraints.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 1158-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Quek ◽  
Q. H. He ◽  
C. H. Sim

The Alexandra Wetlands, part of PUB's Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters (ABC Waters) Programme, showcase a surface flow wetland, an aquatic pond and a sub-surface flow wetland on a 200 m deck built over an urban drainage canal. Water from the canal is pumped to a sedimentation basin, before flowing in parallel to the three wetlands. Water quality monitoring was carried out monthly from April 2011 to December 2012. The order of removal efficiency is sub-surface flow (81.3%) >aquatic pond (58.5%) >surface flow (50.7%) for total suspended solids (TSS); sub-surface (44.9%) >surface flow (31.9%) >aquatic pond (22.0%) for total nitrogen (TN); and surface flow (56.7%) >aquatic pond (39.8%) >sub-surface flow (5.4%) for total phosphorus (TP). All three wetlands achieved the Singapore stormwater treatment objectives (STO) for TP removal, but only the sub-surface flow wetland met the STO for TSS, and none met the STO for TN. Challenges in achieving satisfactory performance include inconsistent feed water quality, undesirable behaviour such as fishing, release of pets and feeding of animals in the wetlands, and canal dredging during part of the monitoring period. As a pilot showcase, the Alexandra Wetlands provide useful lessons for implementing multi-objective wetlands in an urban setting.


1989 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
A. J. Moss

Monitoring of water quality in residential tidal canals in Queensland has been carried out since 1974. Some recent data from four separate canal systems and their source waters is presented. Source water quality was generally good and this high quality was maintained in surface waters throughout these systems. Stratification of the water column in poorly flushed canal branches led to periodic deterioration in bottom water quality but this never resulted in significant management problems. Based on the Queensland data and on data from other Australian and overseas canal systems, conclusions are drawn about significant factors affecting canal water quality. These include flushing rates, source quality, polluting inputs, freshwater inflows and depth. Finally, possible objectives for canal water quality are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document