scholarly journals NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-143
Author(s):  
Edward Schaeffer ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Justin E. Bekelman ◽  
...  

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer address staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and include management options for localized, regional, and metastatic disease. Recommendations for disease monitoring and treatment of recurrent disease are also included. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel meets annually to reevaluate and update their recommendations based on new clinical data and input from within NCCN Member Institutions and from external entities. This article summarizes the panel’s discussions for the 2021 update of the guidelines with regard to systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
David Lu ◽  
Rachel Krupa ◽  
Melissa Harvey ◽  
Ryon P. Graf ◽  
Nicole Schreiber ◽  
...  

Introduction: Here we describe the development of a protein immunofluorescent assay for the detection of nuclear-localized androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7) protein within circulating tumor cells (CTCs) identified in patient blood samples. Used in the clinic, the test result serves as a validated biomarker of futility for patients with progressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who are treated with androgen receptor targeted therapies (AATT) in whom nuclear-localized AR-V7 CTCs are identified and have received level 2A evidence in the 2019 National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) guidelines (v1.0). Methods: Assay development was completed on the Epic Sciences rare cell detection platform using control cell lines of known AR-V7 status and clinical testing of mCRPC patient samples obtained at the decision point in management. Results and conclusions: Using these samples, all assay parameters, scoring criteria, and clinical cutoffs for positivity were prospectively selected and locked. After assay lock, blinded clinical validation testing was initiated on multiple, independent, clinical cohorts as reported by Scher et al (JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1441-1449; JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1179-1186) and Armstrong et al (J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1120-1129).


Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
David Ka-Wai Leung ◽  
Peter Ka-Fung Chiu ◽  
Chi-Fai Ng ◽  
Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh

The development of castration resistance is an inevitable pathway for the vast majority of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Recently, there have been significant breakthroughs in the understanding and management options of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Three novel hormonal agents showed survival benefits in non-metastatic patients. As for metastatic disease, there was an even wider range of management options being investigated. This review summarized advances in the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) including emerging data on novel imaging techniques and treatment strategies.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. CMO.S5977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhonda L. Bitting ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Daniel J. George

Most prostate cancer-related deaths occur in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Until recently, only therapy with docetaxel and prednisone has been shown to prolong survival in men with metastatic CRPC. With the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approvals of sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, and abiraterone acetate, all based on improvement in overall survival, the landscape for management of men with metastatic CRPC has dramatically changed. In this review we will discuss the pivotal clinical trial data leading to these approvals, with particular focus on the unique indication for sipuleucel-T and the implications for optimal management and sequencing of treatment in this patient population.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 198-198
Author(s):  
Tanya Burton ◽  
April H. Teitelbaum ◽  
Cat N. Bui ◽  
James Robert Spalding

198 Background: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among men in the US; mortality rates are highest among those with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Observational data on CRPC are limited. This study examined CRPC treatment patterns relative to NCCN guidelines in a large US health plan. Methods: This was a retrospective claims database analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees with evidence of prostate cancer (ICD-9: 185.xx) between 07/01/06 – 03/31/11. CRPC patients were then identified based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (≥2 PSA increases based on ≥3 PSA values) and/or use of chemotherapy: docetaxel (DOC), mitoxantrone (MIT), estramustine (EST), or cabazitaxel (CAB). The CRPC index date was the first date of PSA progression or chemotherapy. Patients were continuously enrolled for 6 months before (baseline) and ≥6 months after the index date until 09/30/2011 or until death, if sooner (follow-up). Results: A total of 1651 patients met the CRPC selection criteria. Mean (SD) age was 70 ± 9 years, 1085 (66%) received DOC on the index date, and 467 (28%) died during follow-up. A third of patients with DOC received additional CRPC therapy during follow-up: 160 (15%) received MIT, EST, or CAB, and 239 (22%) received a secondary hormonal therapy (SHT: antiandrogens, aminoglutethimide, GnRH/LHRH antagonists, estrogen, or abiraterone acetate). Among 566 patients without DOC, 99 (17%) received a different chemotherapy (MIT = 45; EST = 52; CAB = 2), and 178 (31%) received a SHT. More than half 311 (55%) without DOC did not receive any other CRPC therapy during follow-up, of which 40 (13%) received bone-directed therapy (BDT: denosumab = 0; bisphosphonates = 27; radiation = 13). Conclusions: Consistent with NCCN guidelines, DOC was the most commonly used therapy. However, two-thirds of patients with DOC and over half of patients without DOC did not receive additional CRPC therapy after the index date. In addition, only 13% of patients with no CRPC therapy received any follow-up BDT. Additional research is warranted to understand whether clinical rationale, patient preference, or access to care may have resulted in patients not receiving additional therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document