scholarly journals Treatment of Locally Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (5.5) ◽  
pp. 617-621
Author(s):  
Alan P. Venook ◽  
Christopher G. Willett

Few treatment advances have been observed in recent years for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). The goal remains to find approaches beyond FOLFOX and bevacizumab that will prolong remission. Immunotherapy for patients with microsatellite instability–high tumors represents progress, but this is a very small subset and approximately 30% of patients will not experience response. In locally advanced CRC, good long-term outcomes and manageable toxicity are being achieved with contemporary treatment strategies. Total neoadjuvant therapy, which incorporates induction or consolidation chemotherapy, has improved the treatment of patients with rectal cancer and is now a standard of care, although optimal sequencing is still being debated. Nonoperative management is an emerging option for sphincter preservation, and ongoing studies are evaluating the omission of radiation in select patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (7.5) ◽  
pp. 954-957
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Willett

Excellent long-term outcomes and manageable toxicity are being achieved with contemporary treatment strategies for rectal cancer. Short-course radiotherapy is now an acceptable standard. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which incorporates induction or consolidation chemotherapy, has improved the delivery of treatment regiments. TNT is now a standard of care, although the sequencing of radiation and chemotherapy in TNT, appropriate amount of chemotherapy in TNT, and addition of irinotecan to the regimen are still being debated. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer appears to be a safe option for select patients, but it is not yet an NCCN recommendation. In addition, the omission of radiation is being evaluated as a treatment option in some cases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 179-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Krauss ◽  
Christine Veenstra

AbstractDespite advances over the past 20 years in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, diagnosis, and treatment, survival outcomes remain suboptimal. Five-year survival for patients with locally advanced CRC is 69%; 5-year survival drops to 12% for patients with metastatic disease. Novel, effective systemic therapies are needed to improve long-term outcomes. In this review, we describe currently available systemic therapies for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic CRC and discuss emerging therapies, including encouraging advances in identifying novel targeted agents and exciting responses to immunotherapeutic agents.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav Thosani ◽  
Putao Cen ◽  
Julie Rowe ◽  
Sushovan Guha ◽  
Jennifer M Bailey ◽  
...  

Background: Long term prognosis for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains especially poor with an overall 5-year survival rate less than 9%. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided RFA (EUS-RFA) is an emerging technology and limited data exist regarding long-term outcomes of EUS-RFA for PDAC. In addition to thermal-induced coagulative necrosis and tissue damage, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has potential to stimulate the host antitumor immunity. The aim of this study is to report long-term outcomes of EUS-RFA for unresectable PDAC. Methods: Retrospective chart review of adult patients with an established diagnosis of locally-advanced or metastatic PDAC undergoing EUS-RFA between October 2016 to March 2018 with long term follow up (>30 months). Patients included in the review underwent a total of 1-4 RFA sessions using the Habib EUS-RFA radiofrequency catheter. All patients were concurrently undergoing standard of care chemotherapy. Results: 10 patients (median age 62 years, male 70%) underwent EUS-RFA (Table 1). Location of the primary PDAC was in the head (4), neck (2), body (2), and tail (2). A total of 22 RFA sessions were performed with a range of 1-4 RFA sessions per patient. RFA was technically successful in all RFA sessions (100%). There were no major adverse events (bleeding, perforation, infection, pancreatitis) in immediate (up to 72 hours) and short-term follow up (4 week). Mild worsening of existing abdominal pain was noted during post-procedure observation in 12/22 (55%) of RFA treatments. Follow-up imaging after RFA treatment was available in 8/10 patients. Tumor progression was noted in 2 patients, whereas tumor regression was noted in 6 patients (>50% reduction in size in 3 patients). Median survival for the cohort was 20.5 months (95% CI, 9.93 to 42.2 months). Currently, 2 patients remain alive at 53 and 73 months follow-up since initial diagnosis. One patient had 3 cm PDAC with encasement of the portal confluence, abutment of the celiac axis, common hepatic and superior mesenteric artery. This patient had significant reduction in tumor size and underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy. Conclusion: In our experience, EUS-RFA was safe, well-tolerated and could be concurrently performed with standard of care chemotherapy. In this select cohort, median survival (20.5 months) was improved when compared to published survival based upon SEER database and clinical trials. Future prospective trials are needed to understand the role of EUS-RFA in overall management of PDAC.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e0220579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Mizuno ◽  
Norihiro Yuasa ◽  
Eiji Takeuchi ◽  
Hideo Miyake ◽  
Hidemasa Nagai ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB86
Author(s):  
Hirohito Tanaka ◽  
Shiko Kuribayashi ◽  
Masanori Sekiguchi ◽  
Atsuo Iwamoto ◽  
Yoko Hachisu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document