scholarly journals Blood cell markers that can predict the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e0220579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Mizuno ◽  
Norihiro Yuasa ◽  
Eiji Takeuchi ◽  
Hideo Miyake ◽  
Hidemasa Nagai ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB86
Author(s):  
Hirohito Tanaka ◽  
Shiko Kuribayashi ◽  
Masanori Sekiguchi ◽  
Atsuo Iwamoto ◽  
Yoko Hachisu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1352
Author(s):  
Riku Yamamoto ◽  
Shinya Munakata ◽  
Tomoyuki Kushida ◽  
Hajime Orita ◽  
Mutsumi Sakurada ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Xu ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Charlie Zhi-Lin Zheng ◽  
Yu-Qin Zhang ◽  
Tian-An Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome. Comparison of prognosis between LS and sporadic CRC (SCRC) were rare,with conflicting results. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes between patients with LS and SCRC. Methods Between June 2008 and September 2018, a total of 47 patients were diagnosed with LS by genetic testing at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to obtain homogeneous cohorts from SCRC group. Thereafter, 94 SCRC patients were enrolled as control group. The long-term survival rates between the two groups were compared, and the prognostic factors were also analyzed. Results The 5-year OS rate of LS group was 97.6%, which was significantly higher than of 82.6% for SCRC group (p = 0.029). The 5-year PFS rate showed no significant differences between the two groups (78.0% for LS group vs. 70.6% for SCRC patients; p = 0.262). The 5-year TFS rates in LS group was 62.1% for LS patients, which were significantly lower than of 70.6% for SCRC group (p = 0.039). By multivariate analysis, we found that tumor progression of primary CRC and TNM staging were independent risk factors for OS. Conclusion LS patients have better long-term survival prognosis than SCRC patients. Strict regular follow-up monitoring, detection at earlier tumor stages, and effective treatment are key to ensuring better long-term prognosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaya Spolverato ◽  
Giulia Capelli ◽  
Jessica Battagello ◽  
Andrea Barina ◽  
Susi Nordio ◽  
...  

BackgroundScreening significantly reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). Screen detected (SD) tumors associate with better prognosis, even at later stage, compared to non-screen detected (NSD) tumors. We aimed to evaluate the association between diagnostic modality (SD vs. NSD) and short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for CRC.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study involved patients aged 50–69 years, residing in Veneto, Italy, who underwent curative-intent surgery for CRC between 2006 and 2018. The clinical multi-institutional dataset was linked with the screening dataset in order to define diagnostic modality (SD vs. NSD). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsOf 1,360 patients included, 464 were SD (34.1%) and 896 NSD (65.9%). Patients with a SD CRC were more likely to have less comorbidities (p = 0.013), lower ASA score (p = 0.001), tumors located in the proximal colon (p = 0.0018) and earlier stage at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). NSD patients were found to have more aggressive disease at diagnosis, higher complication rate and higher readmission rate due to surgical complications (all p < 0.05). NSD patients had a significantly lower Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival (all p < 0.0001), even after adjusting by demographic, clinic-pathological, tumor, and treatment characteristics.ConclusionsSD tumors were associated with better long-term outcomes, even after multiple adjustments. Our results confirm the advantages for the target population to participate in the screening programs and comply with their therapeutic pathways.


2019 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Walker ◽  
Cameron Platell

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1901-1908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Peverelle ◽  
Sarang Paleri ◽  
Jed Hughes ◽  
Peter De Cruz ◽  
Paul J Gow

Abstract Background The impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity on long-term outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is unknown. We examined the impact of post-LT IBD activity on clinically significant outcomes. Methods One hundred twelve patients undergoing LT for PSC from 2 centers were studied for a median of 7 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their IBD activity after LT: no IBD, mild IBD, and moderate to severe IBD. Patients were classified as having moderate to severe IBD if they met at least 1 of 3 criteria: (i) Mayo 2 or 3 colitis or Simple Endoscopic Score–Crohn’s Disease ≥7 on endoscopy; (ii) acute flare of IBD necessitating steroid rescue therapy; or (iii) post-LT colectomy for medically refractory IBD. Results Moderate to severe IBD at any time post-transplant was associated with a higher risk of Clostridium difficile infection (27% vs 8% mild IBD vs 8% no IBD; P = 0.02), colorectal cancer/high-grade dysplasia (21% vs 3% both groups; P = 0.004), post-LT colectomy (33% vs 3% vs 0%) and rPSC (64% vs 18% vs 20%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that moderate to severe IBD increased the risk of both rPSC (relative risk [RR], 8.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.81–27.59; P < 0.001) and colorectal cancer/high-grade dysplasia (RR, 10.45; 95% CI, 3.55–22.74; P < 0.001). Conclusions Moderate to severe IBD at any time post-LT is associated with a higher risk of rPSC and colorectal neoplasia compared with mild IBD and no IBD. Patients with no IBD and mild IBD have similar post-LT outcomes. Future prospective studies are needed to determine if more intensive treatment of moderate to severe IBD improves long-term outcomes in patients undergoing LT for PSC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document