The effect of animal shelter sound on cat behaviour and welfare

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-440
Author(s):  
BH Eagan ◽  
E Gordon ◽  
D Fraser

This study assessed how sound affected fear- and maintenance-related behaviour in singly housed cats (Felis silvestris catus) in an animal shelter. Two daily 30-min observation sessions (morning and evening) were made for 98 cats from admittance for ten days or until the cat was removed. Cat behaviour and presence of sound (classified by the source) were recorded by instantaneous and onezero sampling with 15-s intervals. Each 30-min observation session was classified as 'quiet' or 'noisy' if the one-zero score for presence of sound was above or below the median of sessions at that time of day. To ensure that cats had at least two complete days of comparable observations, statistical analysis was restricted to the 70 cats (30 females, 40 males) present for two or more weekdays. Cats varied widely in the amount of fear and maintenance behaviour they performed. Males showed less fear and maintenance behaviour than females. Morning sessions consistently had much more sound than evenings, and cats showed more fear behaviour and less maintenance behaviour in the mornings. Cats showed more fear behaviour in noisy morning sessions than quiet ones, with no comparable difference in maintenance behaviour. Where sessions included a pronounced transition in sound, fear-related behaviour was more common after a transition from quiet to noisy and less common after a transition from noisy to quiet. The results show that shelter cats vary greatly in their responses and suggest that sound in shelter environments can substantially affect their behaviour. Lowering sound levels in shelters may help improve cat welfare.

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1093-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary N. Feldman

Carnivores use various scent-marking methods. Semi-feral domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) were observed to use the same means as their wild counterparts. Adult males performed most urine spray marking. Cats scratched tree bark, producing a visual mark, and probably used trees both as markers and for claw sharpening. Most scratching trees were located along frequently used paths rather than along territorial boundaries or scattered randomly throughout a home range. Bark consistency affected the tree species that were scratched, with soft bark preferred. Although deposition of faeces and urine was recorded, there was no clear evidence for their use as territorial markers; cats primarily eliminated away from the core area of the home range. Most faeces were buried, although exposed deposits were also observed. Cats also rubbed against objects, probably using glandular secretions from the face and tail areas to scent mark. Males rubbed objects more than females, and males scent marked more. Individual males may use different means of scent marking. Scent marking in this study supports the idea that cats do not defend territories, instead patrolling and reinforcing marks throughout a looser home range. The suggestion has been made that different forms of marking may serve separate signalling functions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Owens ◽  
Mariana Olsen ◽  
Amy Fontaine ◽  
Christopher Kloth ◽  
Arik Kershenbaum ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 165 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 323-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Millán ◽  
Oscar Cabezón ◽  
Marcela Pabón ◽  
J.P. Dubey ◽  
Sonia Almería

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiebke S. Konerding ◽  
Hans-Jürgen Hedrich ◽  
Eva Bleich ◽  
Elke Zimmermann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document