scholarly journals Comparative Study of US and Korean Legal System on the Privilege against Self-Incrimination through Forced Unlocking in Digital Era

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-241
Author(s):  
Ook Lee ◽  
◽  
Myung Keun Jee ◽  
Dong Han Lee
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Digital Era

Consumer Protection in Jordanian Discount Sales: A Comparative Study with the Legislations of France, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Tariq Kameel ◽  
Fayez Alnusair ◽  
Nour Alhajaya
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
Market Protection ◽  
Market Intervention ◽  
Constituent Elements ◽  
Shed Light

Abstract This article compares consumer protection in the framework of discounts with the constituent elements of such sales and the relevant methods of protecting consumer rights, according to French, Emirati, Jordanian, and Tunisian legislation and judicial practice. The findings shed light on the operation of consumer rights and market protection, and argues that each legal system has developed divergent means to attain the same goal. While some legal systems have organised sales with detailed rules, others have engaged in very limited market intervention; in the latter case, consumers are prevented from enjoying an important set of rights, as consumer rights and market protection are determined by the merchants.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Conventional Mathematical and Fuzzy Logic Controllers for Velocity Regulation

Axioms ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fevrier Valdez ◽  
Oscar Castillo ◽  
Camilo Caraveo ◽  
Cinthia Peraza
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Speed Control ◽  
Raspberry Pi ◽  
Proportional Integral ◽  
Digital Era ◽  
Processing Information ◽  
Technology Market ◽  
Design Integration ◽  
Mindstorms Ev3

Currently, we are in the digital era, where robotics, with the help of the Internet of Things (IoT), is exponentially advancing, and in the technology market we can find multiple devices for achieving these systems, such as the Raspberry Pi, Arduino, and so on. The use of these devices makes our work easier regarding processing information or controlling physical mechanisms, as some of these devices have microcontrollers or microprocessors. One of the main challenges in speed control applications is to make the decision to use a fuzzy logic control (FLC) system instead of a conventional controller system, such as a proportional integral (PI) or a proportional integral-derivative (PID). The main contribution of this paper is the design, integration, and comparative study of the use of these three types of controllers—FLC, PI, and PID—for the speed control of a robot built using the Lego Mindstorms EV3 kit. The root mean square error (RMSE) and the settling time were used as metrics to validate the performance of the speed control obtained with the controllers proposed in this paper.

Developing Internet Jurisdiction in B2B and B2C Contracts: Focusing on Iranian Legal System with Comparative Study of American, English and eu Laws

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-304
Author(s):  
Taher Habibzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
International Law ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal System ◽  
American English ◽  
Computer Software ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Electronic Communications

Abstract In the modern world, electronic communications play a significant role in areas of national and international law such as Internet jurisdiction. Private international law provides that the competent court is the court within which jurisdiction the contract is performed, so it is important to know the place of performance of the contract in the case of contracts for digital goods such as e-books or computer software delivered online. It is equally important in the case of electronic services such as e-teaching. Furthermore, as consumer protection in B2C contracts is important in developing global e-commerce, it is important to consider whether the consumer party is able to bring an action against the business party in his own place of domicile or habitual residence. The article analyses these questions and proposes ways in which the Iranian legal system might be developed to address issues of Internet jurisdiction in B2B and B2C contracts.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA: SOCIALIST, CIVILIAN OR TRADITIONAL?

2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1099-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Yin ◽  
Peter Duff
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Methodological Tool ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Analytical Device

Taxonomy, as a methodological tool introduced from natural science, brought the categorization of legal systems to comparative law.1The term ‘legal family’2is normally used as a metaphor, because it recognizes that within each grouping there are many variations. Each of the legal families is regarded as a combination of fundamental features of legal systems which have certain similarities. As an analytical device, taxonomy renders the comparison of different laws and legal institutions manageable by means of simplifying or abstracting the diverse and complicated realities of a myriad of legal systems. As a result, the concept of legal families acts as a support for legal borrowing and transplantation, as well as comprising an inevitable part of most comparative law works. Even where as few as two jurisdictions are involved, the categorization of legal families is still a useful tool for most comparative legal analysis. Assisted by the notion of legal families, comparativists can readily understand and explore an unfamiliar legal system.3Normally, such scholars tend to accept the conventional or widely accepted categorization of a particular legal system as belonging to a certain legal family. However, without detailed scrutiny of the first-hand material, distortions may arise as a result of preconceptions held at the beginning of the comparative study.4

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document